mmmm i see this being good and bad, cyber bullying is wrong, as is all bullying... maybe these pricks will get their arse handed to them, 25 years? that is alot thou, but if the crime warrants it, then no nay from me
mmmm i see this being good and bad, cyber bullying is wrong, as is all bullying... maybe these pricks will get their arse handed to them, 25 years? that is alot thou, but if the crime warrants it, then no nay from me
Not even bothering ot follow link, but wouldn't it be great if the post was a trololol.
It's the intent to cause harm, people. It has nothing to do with people that have issues online and come to blows over their opinions. But if you constantly harass, flame, and name call someone, then yes, you should be held accountable.
A misdemeanor is a small time offense. It will be an annoyance that will cost more in lawyer fees than what actually gets paid. You'll go, your lawyer will say you understand it's srs bsnss now, and you'll get community service.
You have no right to make someone else's life miserable. That infringes on THAT persons civil liberties. You having the ability to shoot off your mouth < that persons right to not be harassed.
---------- Post added 2012-04-03 at 11:08 PM ----------
Just if it can be proved as stalking. And those people deserved to be removed from society.
Not in all states.
http://mobileoffice.about.com/cs/tra...gcellphone.htm
It's allowed in AZ, so this law actually makes perfect sense.
However, assuming what you said, if they're sentencing people for "shoe's untied" or "free water" posted on a toilet, then yes it is stupid.
EDIT: Seems like that's an old article, so not sure if it's still in ruling.
EDIT2: http://www.ghsa.org/html/stateinfo/l...hone_laws.html
Nope, still in ruling.
Last edited by ImpTaimer; 2012-04-04 at 03:19 AM.
There are no bathrooms, only Zuul.