Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst
1
2
3
  1. #41
    I Don't Work Here Endus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    78,909
    Quote Originally Posted by Garnier Fructis View Post
    The government could essentially censor the press if they pass this amendment. This is because most media outlets are dominated by corporations. Oh, we don't like what Fox/NBC/CNN are talking about? No problem, just regulate what they can say.
    No, they couldn't.

    Any individual employee or reporter would retain full First Amendment priveleges.


  2. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by Endus View Post
    No, they couldn't.

    Any individual employee or reporter would retain full First Amendment priveleges.
    Quote Originally Posted by Boston College Law Professor Kent Greenfield
    If The New York Times had no constitutional rights of its own, it could be prohibited from printing or distributing its newspapers. Its website could be shut off. Its printing presses could be seized. It could be prohibited from paying employees. The fact that individual reporters would still have rights to distribute homemade handbills or orate from a soapbox would mean little.
    He's not the only law professor who agrees that this is badly written.
    Quote Originally Posted by Zantos View Post
    There are no 2 species that are 100% identical.
    Quote Originally Posted by Redditor
    can you leftist twits just fucking admit that quantum mechanics has fuck all to do with thermodynamics, that shit is just a pose?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •