Questionable sources:
Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or which lack meaningful editorial oversight, or those with an apparent conflict of interest. Such sources include, but are not limited to, websites and publications expressing views that are widely considered by other sources to be extremist or promotional, or which rely heavily on rumor and personal opinion. Questionable sources should be used only as sources of material on themselves, especially in articles about themselves; see below. They are unsuitable for citing contentious claims about third parties.
It's like you guys think I'm making up wikipedia just to mess with you!
Besides you know you love me. This thread would be pretty boring without me. Unfortunately I have to go to breakfast, but I'll be back later. Have fun.
Aye, but some people have this long lost thing called a sense of justice and honor. You know, the people who will punish someone who is doing something wrong even if they are a person with values or ideas they can agree with. Being a blizzard fanboy on a blizzard SECTION of a website is not a free pass to be an arrogant troll on top last I checked. Though I am sure a couple certain mods I know on this website would disagree with me just as you would.