Google has been the "Do No Evil" company from the start, but slowly and surely they have been drifting towards more and more "evil" in order to maximize profits and market control.
Google has been the "Do No Evil" company from the start, but slowly and surely they have been drifting towards more and more "evil" in order to maximize profits and market control.
Microsoft, Google
4chan...
And Apple. I really like their products.
This about sums it up for me, though Microsoft can be the most benevolent as they have paid services.
FB/Google have to do things that invade privacy to some degree to be able to turn a profit. Either you buy the product or you are the product.
FB provides the smartest package of services, all designed for one end goal of facilitating socialization in the digital age.
Google has the neatest toys, google docs/drive and gmail are invaluable. They're a little directionless, they seem to be trying to get a foot in all the logistical aspects of the internet, cornering content delivery.
Most consumers on the mainstream market (myself included) prefer reliability and design over functionallity. Sure, you can do much more with android and devs don't have to get their apps approved. But then there's a chance of malware or some nasty shit. And jailbreaking isn't illegal, but again, there's a reason why most owners of iDevices don't do it. It lowers the stabillity of the phone and you can't get the same amount of support.
I could understand Microsoft being on the list and all but why is Apple there? their presence is so 'minimal' compared to the other three...
There are plenty of other companies with much crazier markups than Apple. In the consumer market they are definitely in the "premium" range but IMO their products tend to be quite solid. Well-integrated systems that "Just work".
As for jailbreaking and the next generation of the iPhone, jailbreaking is mainly useful if you want to mess around with the software in your phone and to me that it completely unnecessary, I'm a software dev who also used to be an electronics hobbyist but honestly, I'm just not interested, to me my phone is an appliance, I can get an SSH client from the app store and I can load my own software on it via my developer account, that's good enough for me.
The big difference between iPhone generations is in hardware and the improvements that are possible with better hardware. You see, a large part of Apple's design philosophy is in UX, better not to ship something than to ship something works but is a bit laggy or quirky. By comparison, early Android phones didn't have hardware-accelerated graphics for their UI and felt extremely laggy thanks to a different attitude towards features, the "just add everything AND the damn kitchen sink, make sure it builds and ship it ASAP!" approach to features...
Apple are made of pure greed. Overpriced products all the way round. Google is by far the most reliable.
Definitely. OTOH, they haven't really done anything particularly evil in the past (like MS who pretty much conspired to have a monopoly on the whole software market for a while in 1990s) nor are they actively mining your personal info and selling it to the highest bidder (like Google and Facebook).
That said, I use products from all four on a daily basis. I'm just saying that Apple really isn't nearly as "evil" as the others (once one gets past the teenage "Crapply sux n haz no gaems!!1 lulzderp!1" stage).
I mean in the internet, Most of their services are not really internet services while Google has many online services, Microsoft same is previous one (Bing and all...), and Facebook explain itself. So why is Apple an "Internet Giants" ?
It is like saying HP, HTC, or any other hardware manufacturing company is an "Internet Giants" because they make something that can use internet. It isn't really relevant.
My smartphone is a primary internet interface device for me. I use iOS on a daily basis to access mail, find services, and to communicate with friends. There are days where it fills that role more than traditional personal computing does.
Thus iOS's ecosystem is just as important to me as Facebook's or Google's.
And, generically, Apple's business model is providing a vertically integrated ecosystem. Other OEMs just provide hardware and rely on other companies to provide OS's, content delivery, and internet browsing.
I didn't know that less than 2% of total smart phones sold was a huge market share. As for tablets, Windows tablets are virtually inexistent. Apple has the biggest piece of the pie concerning that followed by Android. The others a fighting for a declining market share which includes the PlayBook from RIM and the Windows tablets.
Honestly all they did was introducing Windows at the right time and set some sort of standard for an operating system. Besides that they try to gain a piece of every market they can get, but it's not profitable at the moment. Smart phone and tablet market in particular which is failing drastically for them.
Google is the next Umbrella Corporation. Just wait... 'G'-Virus in the works.
I would vote for Google but I hate Google+. Facebook is getting quite shitty too with this new timeline bullshit, and Apple is just an expensive hook for saps. So I guess my vote goes to Microsoft by default.
Why am I back here, I don't even play these games anymore
The problem with the internet is parallel to its greatest achievement: it has given the little man an outlet where he can be heard. Most of the time however, the little man is a little man because he is not worth hearing.
I'm not sure what you define as a smart phone or not but you seem to be not correct.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/24/i...rtphone-share/
They are corporations, they are all evil. Our perceptions may differ due to marketing spin and propaganda campaigns, but believe me when I say that none of these corporations are looking out for the consumer, the little guy like us. They (now) all have stock holders and the only thing that matters is the dividend. Period.