For me it depends on how it developed, and how it's working for them/it on a technical level.
Two separate brains does not necessarily mean it's two beings. It may be one brain divided into two.
However, this does simply seem to be a case of two co-joined twins. It's just impossible to tell from a picture of it's physical appearance.
What it's not, is a new species. It would have to be able to pass on this unique property through mating, for me to consider it another species.
That's actually a pretty tough biological question, not really how we perceive things. On one hand, they are two separate brains, each capable of thinking for itself. On the other hand, they likely would not survive if one of the heads were amputated, so the fact that it can't live without the other might make it one organism.
"When I was 5 years old, my mother told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down 'happy'. They told me I didn't understand the assignment, I told them they didn't understand life." - John Lennon
But what if there's meat for 2 kabobs?
But since said conjoined rat hasn't made babies yet, how do we know it won't pass its advantage further on?
It's also a how people perceive things, as you might have seen that people voted for both 1 rat and 2 rats and a new species, so people see the problem differently. And there will also be a conclusion to this.
As this is the second time this was mentioned I googled it and found a documentary of it. It's quite interesting, though it's sad to see they do have some back problems because of this and a lot of unwanted attention. I also disliked seeing some of the doctors talking about them as if they're some science experiment they want to run tests on... that's just annoying, they're not lab rats. What I found funny though is that they're born in same year as me, lol. I do wonder though if they got a job now how does it work with salaries, do they get payed 2, 1 or 1.5 so to say as... no matter how you treat it, their situation is indeed unique.
So what? Most news brought to this site have already been talked in detail elsewhere. I want to know if people think it's one or two rats or a new species. And I think it does need discussion, but not because of the rat(s) it(them)selves, but for a whole other reason which I will reveal soon. I only used this "mutation" because it fits perfectly with what I want to prove, and this, as I see, is already illustrated by the votes.
It is a single creature, a rat with one body. However, it has 2 separate brains which means the creature has two separate consciences.
"Death is not kind. It's dark, black as far as you can see, and you're all alone."
2 rats, one body, a conjoined rat if you will.
A rat with a mutation. 2 brains and personalities, but still just one body.
I say two rats, because if it/they were human, the term we'd use would be "conjoined twins". Twins meaning two. Yes, there are humans with two heads (and some have multiples of other body parts/organs as well). A well-known case of conjoined twins who basically have two heads and one body are Abigail and Brittany Hensel. They have two personalities, two trains of thought...two driver's licenses.
Conjoined twins happen all the time in different species. To call this particular two-headed rat "evolution" is far-fetched and short-sighted. Unless it has already bred and produced two-headed offspring, then it's just like any other case of conjoined twins in the animal kingdom. It's a mutation. It happens.
2 rats sharing a lower body. They both have a consciousness, but the lower body is shared, they both feel it and will have to compromise in order to move effectively. As they get to know each other better through time that should work, but I digress.
Nope, with glue silly.
That said, I don't think anyone needs to retake high school biology. I'll soon explain why, but your type of response was exactly what I was expecting after a while of discussion. As I said, this is not about the picture, but about perceiving things, that's why the thread is named as such and there's an actual morale to it.
It looks too wide to be a single rat with two heads to be honest... I will go with 2 merged rats.
Now picture this being a human instead of a rat.
Last edited by Larynx; 2012-06-10 at 01:07 AM.
It all just scares me so very very much.
I'll go with this. Similar how when you have two people who didn't quite separate at birth, if the surgery is successful you now have two humans. So I'd say it was two people from the beginning.
I didn't need the nightmare fuel though. >.< It was perfectly fine metaphorically.
You're entering into the topic of "do we see humans and animals differently?, and you're close to what I want to prove, but it so happens that you're not close enough, I didn't pick them for a reason since it would have been too controversial. A rat is different.
Plus, they're not that bad, saw the documentary, they seem to live life to its fullest, I do imagine they will have problems finding men since they did say they want to marry and have kids one day, but besides that they're regular humans in personality, they just had the misfortune of being 2 in one body.
You should have listened to high school biology instead...
The two others have nothing to do with a rat with two heads - its not a mutation and certainly not a new species - its just a malfunction in the growth of the fetus - it being 2 rats is the most correct of those statements as it can be discussed while the others are just plain wrong