Obviously Legendaries can't be found by doing PvP, so it's kind of the trade off imo.
On the opposite side of OP, I think they should remove Legendary items because they can't be earned through PvP.
I understand, but wouldn't that be more of a conflict of interest within your guild? Having players with ambition, and not rising to their level and accommodating them?
There are three options available to anyone in your position
1. Convince your guild to come with you on an epic adventure of achievement and bettering themselves and their raiding.
2. Stay with your guild and allow your dream to be quieted out and raid below your standards.
3. Leave to a better guild and lose the social environment you once had, and gain the raiding environment you always wanted (perhaps getting a new social environment you also enjoy).
I just don't want to allow the mentality that good guilds aren't also fun guilds. It's not true
Removing any content is bad imo.
There is a fine line between clever and stupid.
Kinda have to assume this post was tongue in cheek, but it gets the point across. How many pvp people would rage so hard about this haha. And you know it would be the same guys who say dumb fucking shit like "PVEasy" or "10 people with downs could do heroic mode raiding". They would then be the guys saying anyone who installed the game already has glad so why bother playing, we can't even epeen and put others down?
I could see the forums being so entertaining at that point haha
---------- Post added 2012-07-08 at 05:17 PM ----------
These guys are always the one who show up to pugs (still using their fucking insignia of the Horde/Alliance) and fail at every. single. fight. while they tell the rest of people how awful they are for doing PvE content. Don't even bother.
You realize that's how the world works right? Those who do this for more than the challenge, to be the best should not be made fun of, they work harder they get cooler stuff. this isn't a singler player game. you need to get over yourself.. if you enjoy the game as it is, you should give a damn if hardcores get a mount. Cause if you're just doing it for the challenge titles and mounts shouldn't matter... see what I did there?
If the problem is that PvP prestige is worth more than PvE prestige because it is harder to obtain....
then we should just do what Blizzard has done to PvE and let everyone on any arena team get Gladiator, since those people pay $15 a month just like rest of us, regardless of skill, time commitment, gear, etc.
I don't understand why they don't nerf the shit out of the lower raids, ((and with no gear for jp)) Make the new heroics drop either the normal or heroic ilvl of the last raid.. so people can easily pug the last raid if they wish to gear up instead of heroics ((Or even make the current heroic the level of lfr so people can do that to gear up)... this is so bloody simple I dont understand
Short answer: because some people don't have unlimited funds to spend on server transfers, and endless time to interview for guilds like they are 6 figure jobs?
Honestly, you're way WAY more likely to be with people you dislike when progression is important to you. And way more likely to end up with a group of people that treat you like a "second class citizen" that's just filling in a hole in the roster, or sitting on the bench in case someone gets the stomach flu or a date.
I spent a good part of one year trying to find a guild who was progressing, where I also didn't feel stressed out and angry over a video game every day. And I mostly failed. (Found one GREAT guild - broke up within a month of my joining. Because the RL and GM didn't think the group was "focused enough" - basically the progression was really good, but he thought there was too much "friendliness" and not enough "motivating" - by which he openly stated that we would be more functional if we were competing with each other, and afraid of consequences.)
One of the two reasons I quit to only play LFR now.
I hear PvP IS a competition. Last I checked, PvE wasn't (PvE)v(PvE).
Besides, regarding the people for whom PvE is actually a competition (world first guilds) they already get plenty of recognition.
LFArena - the next feature to cater to the masses!!!
In all seriousness though as someone who does well in both PvE and PvP, I do feel raiding was given the shaft in the prestige department when they removed Realm First titles. As a r1 gladiator I could have not only a mount that a select few obtain and can never be obtained again but also acquire a title specific to a certain season and denoting I was THE best that season. In raiding you don't get anything like that; all of the mounts, vanity items, etc. are obtained by others - the equivalent of challengers and lower in arena - a few short months later, because content is nerfed down to their level. The least Blizz could do is reinstate Realm First titles. How fun would it be for me as a gladiator to arena against people who got a stacking buff every Tuesday/Wednesday for every week they had a losing record? Not very fun at all, imo.
What about server firsts... and if you are a casual why do you care if they give firsts a title? You shouldn't.... because every one of the casual arguments is I should get to experience... how does one experience a title? Hell even remove titles the second they nerf it.
In PVP, you're competing against real live people, almost in a sporting enviornment.
In PVE, you're playing against the computer.
Some people take "realm firsts" and such very seriously, but ultimately they are very different.
And by the time people can pug raids and get titles/mounts, the "elites" have moved on to new and better mounts and titles. Who cares about the old ones?
Blizzard wont do it.
Most of the top PvP players would quit (implying that they already haven't) and I bet Blizzard wont make that mistake now that GW2 is coming soon with their great focus on PvP.
Or could be that PvE already has enough titles and items you can get.
Hi
If the PvE reward should be be comparable to the PvP reward, there should be awarded server's first titles and the mounts awarded from meta raiding achievements and end boss kills titles/mounts should no longer drop after the first hit of major nerfs/new release of tier.
So the OP obviously has a point that the rewards are not comparable and, especially when the current content is so easy to beat, that it is very hard to differentiate between a top notch raider, and a raider, whom you'd probably categorize as a challenger or rival, still has the 'best' obtainable vanity stuff.
On a second note I'd like to point out that the arena titles, with the exception of rank 1, only lasts for 1 season, the gladiator mount however lasts forever.
People who use the term special snowflake make me roll my eyes. The entire point of having progression content and ratings is to set yourself and your team apart from others who aren't as good. It's as if you folks would demand to lift the European Cup for winning in your local footy league. The overly entitled are killing this genre.
Stains on the carpet and stains on the memory
Songs about happiness murmured in dreams
When we both of us knew how the end always is...
Most people don't care about your recognition regardless of whether you play PvP or PvE. Blizz is happy to leave the mounts in place, that way when we are in this lull period between patches in MoP, people will stay occupied and keep subbing while running old DS/FL raids for achievements and mounts.
Who do you think is worth more....the .5%'s monthly subs or the 99.5%'s? Thankfully the (comparably) quiet majority will continue to win over the QQing and epeen stroking we see in these forums.
I look forward to getting my handmaiden mount from DS with a pug in MoP.
The first explanation means you don't know. The second means you don't understand. The third means you can't accept the answer.
Okay I am not QQing I made a threat countering people that was QQing about PvE and thought PvP should only be rewarded... I am sorry If I looked like a attention whore or sounded like I was QQing!