The punish was more than justified.
The punish was more than justified.
That's why you lack reading comprehension. Failing at Baron due to any reason is not a punishable offence, even if it ultimately caused a lost game. However, giving up, stopping playing and losing on purpose due to that having happened IS a punishable offence, therefore the ban was more than justified assuming what was reported actually happened. If you consider the fact the Eve must have gotten several reports in several games to appear in Tribunal it's easy to check other reported games and draw the conclusion whether it's likely to have been intentional or not.
Also, if you REALLY don't see anything insulting on racial background in insinuating that it's normal for all Arabian people to wear goat skin and treat beheading as a past-time then I've got nothing more to say to you. Just be careful to not ask any black people you meet if they're done picking cotton for the day, unlike over internet real people might hit back.
Many f the "intentional" feeders seem like they were merely bad, not trying to feed the enemy team. Is it really against the rules to suck at LoL?
Nope. And quite a few people don't know the difference between feeding and intentional feeding (which is part of the reason Lyte is going to remove that category for reports).
Intentional feeders will just run into the enemy headlong and get themselves killed. Over and over and over. Often they wear boots of mobility and a zeal (or two/three). Someone having a bad game will still, generally speaking, have a solid build and half decent CS for their stats.
---------- Post added 2012-07-19 at 06:44 PM ----------
---------- Post added 2012-07-19 at 06:49 PM ----------
You're given such little information, and yet, you still vote to BAN someone? Ruining their gaming experience (some have used money on it), without actually knowing every major fact? How the hell can you get yourself to do that? Half the time you dont know what's actually going on, because you dont have any in-game footage. Everything's that's wrong with the community is you banhungry asshats spamming punish on the slightest chance, it's pathetic. The only one's you can truly judge is the verbal harassment/offensive language, where they're going nuts on someone. Jesus.
---------- Post added 2012-07-19 at 06:51 PM ----------
---------- Post added 2012-07-19 at 06:54 PM ----------
"therefore the ban was more than justified assuming what was reported actually happened."
THIS is the part that bothers me. How can you assume that party1 is telling the truth when it comes to something as severe as banning someone's account? Just tell me, how can you assume they're telling the truth, and not exaggerating?
Blackroo: you're not voting to have them banned. In fact, the Tribunal does not decide upon any sort of punishment. That's Player Support. Who, incidentally, also have access to a lot more info than the Tribunal.
Furthermore, you're complaining about a lack of info when there's a snippet of the entire report posted here. Over the course of 4-5 games, it can at times be very easy to see what exactly is going on.
In Soviet Russia banks rob you! Oh, wait a second...
Tribunal cases are never from one game. There's plenty of info to draw conclusions from. Also, for this particular case even that little bit of info provided in this thread is not meaningless: the stats looks as if after failing that baron the player in question started intentionally dying to make the loss faster. I don't know whether that was the case or not, but the information in tribunal would likely be more than enough to decide.If you consider the fact the Eve must have gotten several reports in several games to appear in Tribunal it's easy to check other reported games and draw the conclusion whether it's likely to have been intentional or not.
---------- Post added 2012-07-19 at 05:20 PM ----------
You can post the definition of "throwing a game" but everybody knows that it's also used to refer to somebody who just made a terrible mistake that will likely result in a loss (often times in a game that is close or your team is slightly ahead in)
So while your definition may imply an intention, that's not how it's used in practice. It can be used in cases of intentional throws, or just huge mistakes that will likely cost a game.
Also, there's no reason to attack people posting their Tribunal experiences, like somebody else said they are only giving you a very small piece of the information that was provided to them through the Tribunal. Most are just trying to find some "humorous" excerpts which may or may not include the worst portions of the report.
Last edited by Dubalicious; 2012-07-19 at 06:30 PM.
As for attacking tribunal experiences... I'm defending the guys posting them here, and that "somebody else" you mentioned is actually me as well. ;)
Have you EVER been to an Arab country? I have been to almost all Arab countries and countries surrounding them. People don't wear fur in Afghanistan which is said to be the most backward of all Arab countries and you think all Arabs wear fur? Hunting animals is said to be "haram" (illegal) in all Arab countries and they have major religious restrictions on what animals they can consume.
And there are no public executions. Hanging/beheading happens in specific part in jails and family/people can visit them just like hanging/electrocuting in western countries.
Don't talk about shit you have no idea about.
---------- Post added 2012-07-19 at 07:15 PM ----------
Someone having a bad game doesn't mean they are feeding intentionally. A player can come against a hard counter or face someone vastly more experienced then them. It also depends if it was a normal match or ranked. Low elo or high.
In order to make a proper judgement you need more info then posted here.
Besides, this thread is made to have a laugh, dark humor or whatever. Why is the result of the cases bothering so many people who have absolutely no idea what else went threw the game and in the tribunal?
"To fail to take advantage of"
"To waste or use in a foolish way"
My apologies for not distinguishing my second paragraph as it was a general statement, nothing directed at you.
We are pleased to inform you that the rest of the Tribunal has affirmed your judgment on 41 cases today! As compensation for your service to the League, your account has been credited 205 Influence Points.
Half a rune!
That's a 1350 IP champ plus a 450 one! or 4 450 IP champs!Greetings Enstraynomic!
We are pleased to inform you that the rest of the Tribunal has affirmed your judgment on 397 cases today! As compensation for your service to the League, your account has been credited 1985 Influence Points.
The League of Legends thanks you for your service on the Tribunal, Summoner! Remember that you will be eligible to judge 15 tomorrow! May justice be swift!
If that's one-upping, I don't want to see two-upping or, gods forbid, 10-upping.
I was really hoping for some awesome/hilarious quotes from Tribunals...seems this thread has already deteriorated into petty name calling.
I like waffles!
Do they have an app or something along those lines for the tribunal? Would be pretty cool to be able to participate while on the go.