Charr > Norn.
For males ofc, Sylvari/Human males just seems too feminine for me. Asura needs more rugged/goblinish look for me to roll a one.
Reason for me to not play as females: Who goes to war with pretty suits, manicure and makeup?
Charr > Norn.
For males ofc, Sylvari/Human males just seems too feminine for me. Asura needs more rugged/goblinish look for me to roll a one.
Reason for me to not play as females: Who goes to war with pretty suits, manicure and makeup?
Last edited by mmoc6f54e43091; 2012-07-21 at 07:15 PM.
Sylvari/Norn > Human > Charr > ... > Asura
Asura without a doubt though I might make a Sylvari or a Human as well
Charr, and humans. You can't go wrong with a Human.
I like female Norn, but male Norn are too big for me. Asura are too gray/alien-like for me to make more than one, and Sylvari... Well, I don't really want to be a plant.
But sir, surely you can see your folly here? If your Charr were superior a logical, pragmatic man such as myself would acknowledge their superiority. I am sure you are no idiot, but sir, open your eyes and look upon humans and know their brilliance. To claim that any other race is in any way better is foolish, to suggest the Charr are superior is heresy.
Except you're wrong. Such a great race as the charr must be carnivorous, correct? i mean, they are feral animals. So, while they can eat humans, and norn, and asura(in their golems they'd be like canned food!), you can't eat sylvari. However, sylvari are curious of all things, and they're omnivorous. So they'll eat the charr, since charr are animals in the end. And thus, we, sylvari, will have saved the world, and populated it with our race.
Asura > Human > Sylvari > Norn > Charr.
I'm very impressed with the Sylvari and Human character design, as well as their lore and zones. The other races, aside from the Charr, don't really appeal to me.