Page 1 of 6
1
2
3
... LastLast
  1. #1

    Symbiosis Update, Beta Key Sweepstakes, Blue Posts, Upcoming Raid Testing, TCG Art

    Demon Hunter - Inferno Diablo Budget Guide. MoP Release Date and Diablo 3 Perks, John August on Diablo III's Story, D2 and D3 in Starcraft 2

    Symbiosis Update
    Druids get a fun new ability in Mists of Pandaria that gives them a spell from another class and the target an ability from the druid. The spells have changed around since we last posted about it, so here is an updated list of the spell swaps!



    Spells Gained by Druid
    Source Class Guardian Feral Restoration Balance
    Death Knight Bone ShieldDeath CoilIcebound FortitudeAnti-Magic Shell
    HunterIce TrapPlay DeadDeterrenceMisdirection
    Mage Frost ArmorFrost NovaIce BlockMirror Image
    MonkElusive BrewClashFortifying BrewGrapple Weapon
    Paladin ConsecrationDivine ShieldCleanseHammer of Justice
    PriestFear WardDispersionLeap of FaithMass Dispel
    Rogue FeintRedirectEvasionCloak of Shadows
    Shaman Lightning ShieldFeral SpiritSpiritwalker's GracePurge
    Warlock Life TapSoul SwapDemonic Circle: TeleportUnending Resolve
    Warrior Spell ReflectionShattering BlowIntimidating RoarIntervene

    Spells Granted by Druid
    Target Class Tree 1 Tree 2 Tree 3
    Death Knight Blood: Might of UrsocFrost: Wild Mushroom: PlagueUnholy: Wild Mushroom: Plague
    HunterDashDashDash
    Mage Healing TouchHealing TouchHealing Touch
    MonkBrewmaster: Survival InstinctsWindwalker: Bear HugMistweaver: Entangling Roots
    Paladin Holy: RebirthRetribution: WrathProtection: Barkskin
    PriestDiscipline: CycloneHoly: CycloneShadow: Tranquility
    Rogue GrowlGrowlGrowl
    Shaman Elemental: Solar BeamEnhancement: Solar BeamRestoration: Prowl
    Warlock RejuvenationRejuvenationRejuvenation
    Warrior Arms: Stampeding Shout Fury: Stampeding ShoutProtection: Savage Defense


    Mists of Pandaria Beta Key Sweepstakes
    Originally Posted by Blizzard (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)
    If you fancy yourself an explorer eager to set an early foot, hoof, or paw on the long-hidden continent of Pandaria, be sure to enter the Mists of Pandaria Beta Key Sweepstakes!

    Starting July 31, we'll be randomly selecting 2,000 winners each week to receive a key to our exclusive World of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria beta test. In addition, every other winner chosen will receive a second key to share with a friend! Drawings will occur every Tuesday for five weeks for a total of 15,000 keys.

    Signing up is easy. Simply follow Warcraft on Facebook and complete our official entry form between now and August 27 for your chance to win. For more information about how to participate, check out the sweepstakes rules and eligibility page and our sweepstakes FAQ. Good luck!

    FAQ
    To help clear up some concerns regarding the recently-announced World of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria Beta Sweepstakes, we’ve put together a quick FAQ featuring the most common questions that we’ve seen from the community.

    Q. Why did you replace the opt-in with a sweepstakes on Facebook?
    A. The Mists of Pandaria beta opt-in has not been replaced. The sweepstakes is an additional way for us to randomly give out keys to our Facebook followers, but it has not replaced the beta opt-in. We’ll still be sending out beta invites to players who have opted-in, as normal.

    Q. Why Facebook?
    A. When we release important news and announcements about World of Warcraft, Facebook is among the ways we get the message out. Since a significant portion of our players have Facebook accounts, we’d like to encourage them to follow us so that they can stay up-to-date on the latest news and events. Most every news item and story that goes out on our website we also send out on Facebook, so it’s a great way to keep up on World of Warcraft and Mists of Pandaria.

    Q. Why is my country unable to participate in the sweepstakes?
    A. Unfortunately, some countries have laws or restrictions which prevent us from making contests available to their residents. The beta opt-in is still running, however, and does not have the same rules and limitations. If you’re unable to participate in the Facebook sweepstakes we encourage you to sign up for the opt-in through Battle.net Account Management.

    Q. Do I need a Facebook account to enter this promotion?
    A. No. While entering with a Facebook account will provide you with some additional benefits, such as sharing if you’ve won with your friends, you don’t need an account to participate. If you’d like to enter, but don’t have a Facebook account (and don’t want one), you can click on the “Alternate Method of Entry” link at the bottom of the official rules page.

    Q. The contest states that Facebook will not be given my personal information. What do you guys need it for?
    A. If you’re selected as a random winner, we’ll need your name and email address to ensure that you receive your beta key. We will not use this information for any other purpose.
    As for the Facebook application itself, while it will request access to your Friends List, it will not generate any unwanted notifications, messages, or wall posts. The request will simply allow the application to show you your friends list in case you want to let them know about the sweepstakes.

    Q. When exactly will the weekly drawings be held?
    A. Drawings will be held every Tuesday, starting July 31. We’ll gather up all of the entries submitted before 11:59 p.m. PST, Monday and then randomly select 2,000 qualified winners from that pool. Out of those 2,000 winners, half of them will receive an additional key to give to a friend, sent to the email provided in the entry form. Winners will be removed from the entry pool and the process will repeat again the following Tuesday. A total of 5 drawings will be made, with the final drawing being on August 28.

    Please note that if you are randomly selected as a winner, it may take a few days before you are notified and receive your beta key via email. In the meantime, we ask that players please refrain from posting on Facebook or the official forums about whether or not they’ve been selected.

    Blue Posts
    Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
    Mists of Pandaria Digital Deluxe Mount and Pet
    The pet and mount are both available to the Digital Deluxe version. These are also Battle.net account wide. The page is just missing showing the pet currently. (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

    Beta Class Balance Analysis
    If you switch targets while he's tanking something, he'll provoke the new target off you when his cooldown ends - so in essence, he can only "tank" something you're attacking.
    We’re going to try to solve this by making Xuen fixate on the target you summon him on. If that target dies, he’ll revert to assisting you.

    Not sure if this has been addressed but it seems like I am now generating a burning ember when out of combat. Is this intended or a bug? I am running the glyph of burning embers. I do have to say if it is intended it made QOL for a destro lock so much better.
    Yes, this is intended; Destruction warlocks now only decay down to and regen up to 1 Ember out of combat, similar to how Demonology does with 250 Demonic Fury. Oh, and in the next build, we are toning down the fiery effect and sound at 1 Ember.

    Wait, are you sure about that Zar? I remember previous Flametongue testing showing that it had around a ~0.15 ICD. This was to help prevent using double Flametongue imbues and weapon syncing for Enhancement.
    What Zarhym shared is correct, the development team just double-checked.
    Flametongue has no ICD. Using Flametongue on both weapons should naturally be a DPS loss over using Windfury and Flametongue.

    Explosive Shot mechanics: Some time ago, GC announced that explosive shot would join other effects in having "ignite" mechanics. We have been testing it recently to model it in Simc and FemaleDwarf. The mechanics have clearly been changed, but don't match the typical ignite model. For example individual ticks to crit and debuff changes on the target affect the damage of future ticks. Further, some damage appears not to get rolled into the ignite-style debuff. We have looked at a few models (e.g., the ES under LnL don't do ignite but other do, crit dmg is subtracted from the dot pool, etc.). So far the models don't correctly model crits. Can you please explain the actual and/or planned future mechanics here?
    The version in your current build has a bug with this rolling periodic-type effect on Explosive Shot in particular. That’s been fixed for the next beta build. I believe, in that build, it’s not counting the extra initial periodic tick that Explosive Shot deals when calculating the rolling damage. Regardless, fixed for the next build. (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

    Making Leveling Interesting
    Having also leveled through vanillla, I'm familiar with the 'dangerous' experiences mentioned by the OP. Due to several things such as the sprinkling of elite mobs throughout zones, loot and quest rewards that weren't really that good for anyone (Hmm, a cloth item with strength and intellect, but hey, it's an upgrade for my warrior so I'll equip it!), and of course something we all face when new to a game — the great unknown — it did seem a lot more challenging.

    But in reality, all I ever did with those elites was to give them a very wide berth. If I had a quest that involved killing them, most of the time it would sit and rot in my quest log until it went grey because it required more people to help, people that were busy off having their own adventures. I personally don't miss those quests taking up space in my log, and I'm also kinda glad that if I accidentally stumble into an area that used to be inhabited with elites, it no longer means a long time-wasting trip through black and white land to reclaim my broken corpse. I can't speak for everyone, but I don't think dying is much fun and I try to avoid it at all costs.

    If you'd like to try leveling with an extra element of challenge, firstly you should go solo, it's not really surprising you find it easy with a friend. Secondly, if you want danger, roll on a PvP server. If you have a real death wish, pick a realm where the opposing faction has a higher ratio. Next up, try leveling in zones aimed at higher levels. It'll significantly raise the chance you'll take on more than you can handle. Lastly an obvious one: No heirlooms.

    This is true. If the mobs just had a bigger hp pool could create the illusion of difficulty. I find killing mobs in three seconds a bit boring personally.
    Would taking 10 seconds instead to kill each mob give you a better game experience while leveling? Considering how many mobs you have to get through for some quests, that could get really grindy :S

    What really can get annoying is how fast you get through with a zone, specially with heirlooms. And I know what you're gonna say "take your heirlooms off then!", but the problem isn't the rate at which I level.. After like 5 lvl 85s I don't really feel like wasting months and months to level a new alt, yet if zones could be available for a few more levels....I like to see the areas, the quest lines and follow a new story, yet it gets a bit disheartening to keep going when all your quests are green or gray and you can one shot every single mob along the way.
    That's a valid point, but it's a side effect of equipping heirlooms.

    You admit yourself that you want to level quickly, and that's what heirlooms are for, to give you the desired effect through bonus XP as well as ensuring you always have decent stats for your level. However, quest XP also has to be tuned for players not wearing heirlooms and/or with guilds that don't have the bonus XP perk. For example, if you gain 5 levels in a zone by the time you reached the end of that zone, non-heirloomed players will have gained nowhere near that much, so the level of difficulty has to reflect that.

    You seem to be under the nigh permanent illusion that something taking a very long time equals it being difficult and that that's what we're after. It isn't. We want the content when leveling to be harder, not slower.

    And it has nothing to do with us really. We're veterans, and we can do nigh anything you throw at us that would be reasonable to expect in the leveling game. We want you to make a harder leveling game such that you can ease people into a harder endgame, so that you don't have to spend such a ridiculous amount of time making really easy and boring content at max level because nobody ever figured out how to play on the way up.

    As I said earlier, I don't see longer fights against low level mobs as being more challenging at all, just more grindy.

    I see and understand what people are saying here, I'm sorry if some of my answers to individual comments are coming across as responses to the issue as a whole. (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

    Content Consumption Speed and Difficulty
    and making it accessible isn't always a good thing. if everyone can climb Mount Everest, nobody will be interested in doing it. see my point?
    Then, please, answer the question: How many people, provided the means for it, would climb Mount Everest if offered the chance? By your reasoning, just as much as today (because if it becomes too popular, nobody will be interested in doing it). However, I can tell you, at the very least there'd be one more person willing to climb it (myself), and I'd argue I wouldn't be the only one willing to go and climb Mount Everest if that chance was there.

    You cannot possibly say, given the available information, that just because players run LFR, they enjoy LFR. There are many posts on this forum by players with over a dozen LFR Deathwing kills who say it's boring, they dislike running it and wish it weren't there.
    Sorry, but you can't say, based on such a small sample, that there's a majority of people not enjoying LFR. You just can't. It isn't fun for you and for some players posting on these forums? Sure.

    Even given that some players love LFR, it makes the game considerably worse for others. Unless you have a measure of these two groups and their quantifiable feelings on the matter, you cannot make the statement that more players raiding is better than less players raiding. It simply does not follow.
    More players raiding is better than less players raiding. It's a simple matter of numbers. Yes, more is good.

    If you where somewhere in BT or Sunwell you still ran Karazhan and ZA every week to help people gearing up, it was fun.
    It was fun for some. In other guilds, you almost had to beg people to go back there because they had seen the place just too many times already and didn't really have a reason to go there.

    Sample is a sample, people guess the outcome of elections based on small samples with accuracy to 0.5% all the time.
    Yeah. But those samples actually take a broad range of people in. If I did a sample only on left-party minded people, my sample would say that they would win the elections with a massive landslide. It's kinda the same in this case. If you ask mostly hardcore players, of course, you'll get the impression the game's too easy (and vice versa).

    More is not better, more leads to quantity and not quality. More people having access to something without effort devalues the reward and the effort put in by others. Easy content being consumed fast is what leads to problems like what we have now, DS for 6+ months and people having nothing to do in game.
    You can not judge neither what constitutes effort for other players, nor what is easy content for others. It's easy and effortless for you? Good for you, but don't make the assumption it is for everyone else, because it's not really the case. There're guilds still advancing through Heroic DS and they're actually being challenged and putting a ton of effort on it.

    Back in TBC we did run Kara/ZA for newer members that needed gear, we also ran attunements for members that needed them, it was fun, people LOVED to raid. YES, some people complained, but it was minority, same way you treat the "minority" that complains now how easy the game is.
    And they went out of their own interest? Or perhaps because you had some kind of system that would reward attendance to those raids? (DKP, for instance) That was the case in some guilds. DKP (or whichever system) was in place to "encourage" raiders that didn't need anything from those places to actually login and go there (same way it was being used to ensure that raiders would appear during progression nights and not just for "farm status" bosses). They had fun with the social aspect of the game, but didn't particularly enjoy killing Shade of Aran for the 100th time.

    've never heard of a single guild that used a DKP system for outdated content, especially not for gearing up new members. It was something you did because you wanted to be treated the same way if you were in the position of the newbie. And because you knew that it would ultimately help your guild in it's progression, which was something that actually meant something to you back then.
    I saw my fair share of them back in the days. Granted, it didn't happen in my guild and the most hardcore guilds I knew back then didn't really have it for the reasons you mention.

    Draztal repeating over and over that there are still people progressing through DS hc is not helping my mental state either tbh.
    Does it bother you that that's actually happening? That people is progressing through DS these days? Or is it something else?

    Or are you trying to state that the entire WoW community should wait for new content until every single player cleared Dragon Soul Heroic?
    Not at all. I was curious about what he said. Nothing else.

    The example is good, today's heroic raiding = Everest reduced to a pile of rubble!
    The proper example would be people climbing Everest without oxygen and just by themselves (which is one of the hardest feats, if not the hardest, that exists in mountain climbing) as opposed to people that do with the use of oxygen bottles and Sherpas guiding them through the most dangerous sections of the mountain.

    That's one of the things that I haven't seen many acknowledge here. There's people out there that are actually being challenged by the current difficulty of Dragon Soul.

    What do you think about the fact that many of those people who are being 'challenged' by the content (by which I assume you mean that they are still progressing in heroic) are only still progressing because they started raiding months into patch 4.3?
    This is not true, there're guilds that started when the patch was released, that are still progressing through Heroic Dragon Soul and being challenged along the way. As crazy as it might sound, it's true. Same way that people in Wrath of the Lich King started raiding on ICC on release day, and never got to beat Heroic Lich King.

    More players raiding is better, are you !@#$ing kidding? (Pardon the language, but your really boiling blood now!)
    Yes, more players seeing the content the devs have put so much time on, is a good thing. There's nothing crazy about that notion.

    If your measure of success is how many people are enjoying endgame PVE content, and particularly compared to the previous endgame model where applicable, then participation numbers are not a measure of success.

    So unless you have numbers to show how many players are actually enjoying WoW's PVE endgame compared to 4 years ago, -enjoying- not -participating in-, please stop repeating this point that more people 'seeing the content' is a great thing. Because you cannot substantiate it.

    And you can speak on behalf of all those silent players to say they're not having fun? And by which definition of enjoyment should we go? Yours? If people go there every week, they must enjoy that activity to some degree (no, really, most people won't do something they don't enjoy).

    Those are not progressing, they are farming. Maybe you should look up the word "progress" in a dictionary. They have beaten the challange and their gear and constant "practise" makes it very easy for them. Maybe you should try it some day so you dont sound like a casual that never did any progress.
    I'm telling you they are progressing. So, please, don't try to twist my words. They are still progressing and hoping to get to Deathwing soon. And in case you didn't realize, yes, I'm speaking about cases I actually know from firsthand experience.

    As for your assumption about my casualness, thanks. I've been raiding (and still do) since 2005. And I've enjoyed raiding on every stage of the game up to now.

    I am getting tired of this flawed argument. LFR is not about experiencing the content, it is about easy epics. That alone.
    Not at all. It's just aimed at a different demographic. If for you it's about easy epics, that's all fine. But it certainly wasn't created with that objective in mind.

    I don't know anyone who actually enjoys doing LFR, they do it because it is mandatory for their personal progression.
    You don't know anyone, doesn't mean they don't exist, right? (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

    Player Housing
    I'm afraid there's no update since the last time we spoke about it. We know it's a feature that some players would be interested in, but consider the fact that players are sad to see the world outside the city is quieter since the introduction of things like the LFD tool and flying mounts etc. I'm speculating here, but player housing may take yet more people out of the world, and even cities.

    Plus there's also the continuous weighing-up we have to do when it comes to development time. I imagine it would be a huge task, taking the devs away from creating new encounters and other features. (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

    Polling Players for Opinions
    Something we'd like to see a lot more of is voting up or down on comments here in the forums. This way, when someone gives their thoughts on a topic, we can get a much better idea of how many people agree or disagree. It's also handy if you don't have time to make your own reply. (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

    Battleground Win Ratios
    From the perspective of someone who mainly plays as Alliance, I can tell you that it often feels very similar from the other side of the playing field. We also have those players that advise everyone to lose quickly just two minutes or so into the game.

    Having said that, the experience varies a lot from week to week. Sometimes I won't win a game all night, other times it's a lot better. Also, I find my chances of winning seem to go up significantly if I team up with friends. Even if it's just me and one other person communicating and working together, we can often help turn the tide. Give it a try!

    I have a feeling that blizzard use some advanced balancing algorithms for bg-s, like giving invisible buffs to one team so both sides win/lose approximately same. This is based on my subjective observation that I sometimes kill very easy some players and sometimes it's very hard (note that they use similar gear) in 1v1 inside bg.
    No. (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

    Vanity Items as PvP Rewards
    PvE players can get mounts from meta achievements, RNG boss drops while PvP players have to get Gladiator to get a cool mount which is nearly impossible for the average player.
    PvP players have Meta achievements that offer vanity rewards. "The Arena Master" and "Battle Master" offers a title, "Master of Isle of Conquest" offers a tabard and there are, as Tentimer mentioned, many other titles that can be gained through PvP.

    This subject was already touched on slightly by the “Gear in PvP” thread by Rasen where he spoke about getting cosmetic rewards in PvP over gear upgrades. The difficulty that is present with vanity rewards in PvP is that they cannot work the same as for PvE. Gating for rewards using ratings would be cool but these are similar to what is already awarded for the end of each season. Just requiring honor and conquest points takes away the prestige of the items because they would then be achievable by everyone. So this begs the question of what kind of achievements do you think would be good for something such as this in PvP? (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

    An Alternative End Game - a Focus on the Journey
    Perhaps you should try traveling for inspiration or for simple enjoyment, and not for the sole purpose of reaching a destination?
    That's what I meant, there's a goal, a reason for any journey (even if it's just having fun).

    Can we get a CM who isn't Draztal? Every post I read he/she is just dodging the actual point to argue on one minor detail. Here we see arguing semantics.
    I'll try to word better my posts next time. I'm definitely not arguing semantics (why would I, since I'm not even a native english speaker in the first place).

    Draztal, judging from that comment, i see you've never had a long walk in your town at night, or in a forest during the autumn, or on a mountain during summer.
    I have, I definitely have. And I had a reason for doing them. The intent of my post yesterday was rather philosophical and not about specifics (in those cases you're walking because either you like it, for the relaxation, or something else).

    I'm normally highly fond of your posts in particular Draztal, however this one doesn't sit right with sentimental old me. How about we say life is the journey, and death is the destination? I don't know about you, but I'll take my time and enjoy the ride rather than eagerly anticipating my arrival.
    Way to go to the extreme, hah! To be fair, I get your point. My question was just from a "philosophical" point of view. And this particular case mentioned by Andrai is kind of what I was looking for:

    I know with austerity and the price of fuel in Europe people don't tend to do this any more. But, when I first started driving and fuel wasn't bank breaking. I used to just jump in the car some weekends and drive. Anywhere.
    The journey had NO destination. Yet, I enjoyed it nonetheless.


    I'm certainly not dismissing Straif's post, this bit: A focus on the journey and experiencing the content, therefore the reincarnated character has a reduced experience xp rate, no rested xp and no heirlooms can be used.

    Was what made me post here. It's a valid point for that journey (experience the content). However I've seen other players (not in this thread, though) arguing that they like the journey when they know they can't get to the end. And that's where my post comes from.

    In one hand you have people that want a journey and they actually know why, there's a reason to it (a destination, even if it's not necessarily getting to the end of the road). In the other hand, you've got people that say they want that same journey, but when questioned about it, they can't really put into words why they want a never-ending journey.

    And that's what my question was directed to. Would there be any fun to a never-ending journey that is actually there just for the sake of not letting you reach the destination? (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)

    Raid Testing Schedule - July 26
    Originally Posted by Blizzard (Blue Tracker / Official Forums)
    We will be testing two 10-player Heroic raid encounters tomorrow, Thursday July 26th.

    Each encounter should be available at approximately the listed times below for all Beta Test Realms, regardless of suggested geographical region.

    Imperial Vizier Zor'lok (Heart of Fear) - 10 Player Heroic
    10:30 PDT (13:30 EDT, 19:30 CEST)

    Elegon (Mogu'shan Vaults) - 10 Player Heroic*
    16:00 PDT (19:00 EDT, 01:00 CEST)

    As always, this testing schedule is very fluid and subject to the realities of a beta environment. We might have to change the time of a testing session or cancel it entirely, due to bugs, builds, server hardware issues, etc. Keep an eye on this forum for the latest information, and thank you in advance for testing and providing feedback.

    *In particular, Elegon may change to Blade Lord Ta'yak instead. We'll update this post accordingly.

    Trading Card Game Art Gallery Update
    Blizzard has updated the Trading Card Game art gallery to feature ten new pieces.




  2. #2
    I just hope that Symbiosis doesnt become mandatory for some encounters.

  3. #3
    Mages are still screwed, how the hell are we supposed to use healing touch? :P Not useful at all.

  4. #4
    Stood in the Fire Phantoms's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    357
    Retribution will never get it. Wrath, hooray...

  5. #5
    No sweepstakes for the EU, no TCG items in the CE. Stop dissapointing me blizzard

    These are NOT new pieces! I have all those in several decks laying around here.

  6. #6
    Bullshit, Prot warriors get full blown savage defense on 60 sec cd but the best i get it a 10% elusive brew or a bone shield on a 60 sec cd.

  7. #7
    I like how they gave Warlocks and Mages healing spells out of the (Symbiosis) deal.

  8. #8
    The Lightbringer Lora's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Some random weird place
    Posts
    3,114
    It'll hardly be a mandatory thing. It sounds to me like it will be a fun ability to play around with.

  9. #9
    So the only thing a hunter would want from a druid is dash? I think they need to work a little bit more on this...

  10. #10
    I think symbiosis is more of a "quality of life" type thing, which is pretty cool imo.

  11. #11
    I disagree. In almost any hardcore raiding environment, you will be forced to place it on the tank 99% of the time. Especially if you are rolling with a Brewmaster. Giving them a (even half) Survival Instincts is absolutely overpowered.

  12. #12
    Why in the world would I want Growl?
    When in doubt, simply ask yourself: "What would Garrosh do?"

    #wwgd

  13. #13
    Someone explain to me why ret gets wrath?

  14. #14
    Like Lora said it doesn't look like a mandatory thing from the PvE pov, but more like a fun ability that will bring some minor tools for each class to the table.

    For PvP however I think this ability will be a big issue and the core of many problems and balanced issues. Yet Id had to look at all the variables but for instance a spellcleave team with triple heals, Hunters with Monkey Speed v2.0, Feral had imo some pretty crazy survival in pvp already and they are getting some nasty defensive spells from some classes with symbiosis, Resto druids with Fear,Cyclone and Roots, ... I dont really know.

  15. #15

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeina View Post
    Why in the world would I want Growl?
    I'll give it to a friend for our late night 5 mans, have fun tanks. >: )

    Might be cool to taunt someone off a healer in pvp.
    Last edited by Bahska; 2012-07-26 at 08:00 AM.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Sephrie View Post
    Mages are still screwed, how the hell are we supposed to use healing touch? :P Not useful at all.
    It's gonna be ridiculously OP on pvp. CC enemies, get on LOS, get full health, back to pew-pew.

  18. #18
    Great, they can have Divine Shield and they give us (us being Ret Paladins) Wrath. Seriously, wrath? Out of the entire druid tree, we get wrath?

    Someone needs to be fired over at Blizzard.


    The other issue this causes is for those of us that know each class inside out and know what we are to expect, this essentially ruins that. No idea what they'll do now. Time to skip Arena I think.

  19. #19
    Deleted
    Hunters get dash? Always? Stupid and not fun at all

  20. #20
    Geez. Druids get so much cool stuff. Cool fun spells, awesome glyphs, updated models for each spec etc.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •