Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst
1
2
3
  1. #41
    Stood in the Fire gurv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Darkspear stronghold
    Posts
    429
    "i dont want LFR on the same lockout. i want it removed. if players dont put in enough time and effort, they dont deserve to be rewarded with content."
    It would be good if these people would put their money where their mouths are and just leave the game.
    I sure wouldn't miss such jerks.

    ---------- Post added 2012-08-09 at 07:07 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Madisyn View Post
    If you're a leatherworker, there are 3 different factions that you'll have to grind out in order to get each leg armor recipe.
    [...]
    So from those examples they gave me, I can understand why people might be pissed off about the need to grind more rep in order to be able to spend their VP or JP to fill gaps in their gear.
    Yeah I must admit this whole reputation grinding does look really bad (even more so for me since I'm an altoholic with many professions). Though it's still beta and things can still change for the better.
    It probably won't be game breaking for me but I sure won't be happy with it. I'll have to be carefull not grinding rep on many alts at the same time or I'll burn out really fast (like I did with Molten Front dailies of which I keep awful memories).

  2. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by gurv View Post
    "i dont want LFR on the same lockout. i want it removed. if players dont put in enough time and effort, they dont deserve to be rewarded with content."
    It would be good if these people would put their money where their mouths are and just leave the game.
    I sure wouldn't miss such jerks.
    25% of the playerbase and counting : P

  3. #43

  4. #44
    Pit Lord
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Silvermoon City
    Posts
    2,397
    Quote Originally Posted by gurv View Post
    "i dont want LFR on the same lockout. i want it removed. if players dont put in enough time and effort, they dont deserve to be rewarded with content."
    It would be good if these people would put their money where their mouths are and just leave the game.
    I sure wouldn't miss such jerks.
    Agree, this guy is a... well, I can write a bunch of names but I will get infracted so I won't
    And hiding behind a hunter with 4K achievement points is so classy, too. -_-
    Last edited by Tomana; 2012-08-09 at 07:28 PM.

    BC/LK raider ('07-'10)

  5. #45
    Herald of the Titans Suikoden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Lion's Arch
    Posts
    2,680
    Ew they had taken SI from feral at one point? Wow.

  6. #46
    Quote Originally Posted by Jodmos View Post
    Just noticed on US forum

    http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/6293820089

    RAF will apply to monks.
    And it still counts toward server first monk.

    Incomming mass of QQ from all the people who were not actually serious about server first (anyone who was either already had the levels ready just in case or planned to as soon as official word was given).

    Personally, I'm just glad they finally gave a straight answer on it. I don' tcare about server first, but I also dont want to spend the first day or so of release redoing 1-80 for the hundreth time.

  7. #47
    Lol, making Power Infusion priest only for fear they'll be forced to take it to benefit someone else, yet, they are leaving Symbiosis in the game. Right... I know PI is a talent and Symbiosis is baseline, but still.

  8. #48
    Blizz said that: I can improve my char every day,
    but the truth is: i can improve much slower because: tabards dont give us reputation and valor can only spend on reputation vendors :S it is a double slowing effect.

  9. #49
    So stance-dancing is done, then.

  10. #50
    Quote Originally Posted by Arabushsa View Post
    Blizz said that: I can improve my char every day,
    but the truth is: i can improve much slower because: tabards dont give us reputation and valor can only spend on reputation vendors :S it is a double slowing effect.
    Hey let's remove head enchants from the game - we don't wanna force players to grind (1 per spec) specific reputation to get them...
    Is this a joke? Why do they combine VP/JP Items and Reputation now? Revered with 4 factions is needed to trade my VP for all the epics that make sense for 1 spec? I don't think, that it'll be a problem for me, but after their statement about head enchants this is absolute nonsense.

    When I get back to beta today I'll check these vendors, it's hard to believe that this reputation thing is true...

  11. #51
    Pit Lord
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Silvermoon City
    Posts
    2,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Flohsakk View Post
    Is this a joke? Why do they combine VP/JP Items and Reputation now? Revered with 4 factions is needed to trade my VP for all the epics that make sense for 1 spec? I don't think, that it'll be a problem for me, but after their statement about head enchants this is absolute nonsense.
    You don't really need those epics unless you have a gap to fill in your gear. Highest you should get is honored (recipes, except AC - revered), then everything else is just icing, as VP items are worse then raid items.

    BC/LK raider ('07-'10)

  12. #52

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •