Ok then. I don't mind length. Go bring up some examples from my posts. Nowhere in this thread did I ever say that. Hell, feel free to look through my post history.
You have no idea what the fuck you are talking about. No. They tried to trademark the name Dota. That's all they did. It didn't "DEFINE" the entire genre, Riot had already released LoL calling it a "MOBA" to try and break away from that labeling. And even then, the term that Icefrog ad Dota players used was ARTS (Action Real Time Strategy). The genre wasn't called "dota." I can link you to
multiple sources (first sentence) telling you you're wrong. Valve filed for trademark of the name Dota. 3 days after Riot counter-filed and then Blizzard came along because they were developing their own "Blizzard Dota." They eventually settled it and Valve got to call in "Dota 2" and Blizzard "Bliizard All-Stars." If you're going to try and talk about this shit, at least know the background and do some research if you're so uneducated.
It's different because they're the only ones who did it. Did HoN or Valve go to tournament organizers and wave money in their face to ensure they have no competition? It's a business move, but people still hate it because it's a dick move.
How about you do more than get information from the source who is being accused. Note that he does say that there was a 'big miscommunication'. So this at least may mean that something was said in which these teams thought that they were not allowed to have teams in two different games. Otherwise, why would he acknowledge that there was a big miscommunication? Riot most likely considered and explored the possibility, talking to a few teams, but when they realized how fucking stupid this was, they dropped it.
"iNControL, SirScoots and Slasher wasn't the ones to 'concoct' this as many LoL-followers seem to believe, but merely the first to bring it up in a public setting.
This alledged rumor had been a hot topic for a lot of players during The International from the very beginning of it (approximately two weeks prior to Live on Three) as it so very much concerned them (current as well as future sponsorships).
These 'rumors' were started, confirmed and further developed by players and organizers who this would directly influence and was confirmed time and time again throughout the entirety of the tournament.
When this was then made public, a shitstorm abrupted; not just towards Riot Games but also vice versa against the very people who made this public knowledge as well as the direct competitor (Dota 2). Should there be any hint of truth to these rumors, which I personally full-heartedly believe there is taking into consideration how I know Riot has chosen to do business in the past and what kind of rules they have imposed on the MLG and ESL, it is painfully obvious that some organizers might be scared of the repercussions from the community let alone Riot Games themselves, should they choose to come forward with information confirming these rumors.
Alledgedly, the rule was that organizations could not have a League of Legends team participating in the upcoming pro circuit for Season 3 as well as a team in a competing game of the genre (ARTS/MOBA). Was the rule yet made public? Obviously not. Had all organizations been made fully aware of the intent to enforce this rule? Probably not. Had some organizations been in talks with Riot Games and been informed of these intentions? Very likely. Did Riot Games back off from the rule, before taken into effect, seeing the community's response? Most definitely.
Above questions are obviously assuming the rumor is true. Regardless of true or not, I'm actually pleased that the communities can come together about one thing, the only thing that actually matters: That the rule - if it ever did exist - would be ridiculously stupid."
-EG.Maelk
Just because I enjoy something doesn't mean I can't look at it with a criticizing eye sometime. Good to see those kneepads Riot bought you are getting good use.