Poll: Do you include 10 man raids in World First

Page 19 of 19 FirstFirst ...
9
17
18
19
  1. #361
    funny cos 10m its harder than 25m
    That guy (>'.')>


    WoW Cinematics : WotLK>WoD=MoP>Vanilla=Cataclysm>TBC

  2. #362
    The Unstoppable Force Granyala's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Arkon-III
    Posts
    20,131
    No.

    As long as the differences in difficulty are as big as they are now, one cannot mix both sizes.
    2 lists are needed, one for 10man and one for 25man.

  3. #363
    I'd be okay with separate tracking, provided it went something like this:

    World First:
    World Second:
    World Third:

    In addition to that, there'd be

    World First 10:
    World First 25:

    Acknowledge the World first-third, as well as the first 10 / 25. That way everyone's happy.

    PS: 10 being inferior to 25 threads are against CoC IIRC. Don't be a jerk just because you raid with additional people (Talking to everyone, not specifically anyone here)

    PPS: @Anyone who truly thinks 25 is > 10, what if ALL RAIDS in Burning Crusade and Lich King were 10 man only (later they added an EASIER raid for 25 people in LK)? Everyone would then say that 10 man is the "real" raid because it previously was the harder difficulty. Please be considerate and acknowledge that there is no inferior raid, except for LFR
    Last edited by Polarthief; 2012-10-21 at 01:26 PM.
    Still wondering why I play this game.
    I'm a Rogue and I also made a spreadsheet for the Order Hall that is updated for BfA.

  4. #364
    Deleted
    I think 10man and 25man are 2 different races.
    So there should be a world first for each of them. It's like Moto-GB. There you have different classes and each class has it's own world champion.

  5. #365
    10 man raids were barely relevant before DREAM Paragon got involved

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •