Yes, World First is World First, regardless of raid size
No, only 25 man raids are real World First
I think of them as their own thing.
Paragon got the world first 10man kill, but 25man was still open to get etc.
funny cos 10m its harder than 25m
That guy (>'.')>
How i would rate WoW Cinematics : WotLK>MoP>Vanilla=Cataclysm>TBC
I'd be okay with separate tracking, provided it went something like this:
In addition to that, there'd be
World First 10:
World First 25:
Acknowledge the World first-third, as well as the first 10 / 25. That way everyone's happy.
PS: 10 being inferior to 25 threads are against CoC IIRC. Don't be a jerk just because you raid with additional people (Talking to everyone, not specifically anyone here)
PPS: @Anyone who truly thinks 25 is > 10, what if ALL RAIDS in Burning Crusade and Lich King were 10 man only (later they added an EASIER raid for 25 people in LK)? Everyone would then say that 10 man is the "real" raid because it previously was the harder difficulty. Please be considerate and acknowledge that there is no inferior raid, except for LFR
Last edited by Polarthief; 2012-10-21 at 01:26 PM.
Retired Veteran Raider: [T14] 10/16H, [T15] 12/13H, [T16] 7/14H
Currently playing a Black Mage Scholar & Summoner "I-don't-even-know-anymore" on FFXIV and crying that
RDMs don't exist yet SCHs are gimped WHMs and SMNs are gimped BLMs I don't know what class to play
I think 10man and 25man are 2 different races.
So there should be a world first for each of them. It's like Moto-GB. There you have different classes and each class has it's own world champion.
10 man raids were barely relevant before DREAM Paragon got involved