These forums are really becoming useless with all these kids here trolling and posting bullshit.
These forums are really becoming useless with all these kids here trolling and posting bullshit.
Woo, wall of text!
This statement is falls on every level pretty much. First of all, the only Tier they have commented on is T12, which they did all 10 man because they were so far ahead of every other guild, killing ragnaros a full week before the second best guild, method.
Due to popular request they talked about what they thought about Tier 12 10 man vs 25 man, and many encounters there were easier in 10man, according to Paragon.
They did not do this on T13 or T11 (al'akir exception) and thus you can't say that they always thought the same thing. Many share the view that T11 was indeed harder for 10 man guilds then the 25 man ones.
They did also beat Method in the DS race, even with a christmas break (method probably took one too though). Calculations also show that they probably would have been number 1 that tier too, if they did not do the LFR abuse. Ofcourse they only have themself to blame, but calling them unskilled and saying method is better is just wrong, when none of this has any facts to back it up, in any tier.
If you actually are an active user here, you should have seen one famous and well known paragon member, writing in the biggest to date "T14 race thread" that he agreed with many views that they should be two completely different tiers, that they do not do this in anyway to take credit from Method, and really hoped that method finally would get thier so long wanted World first 25 man this expansion.
Calling this selfish? Calling this "hypocritical?" So anything positive you say about another guild obviously have a deeper, darker side embraced in it.
Let's jump to the next invalid point!
Once again you seem to twist the word that a member say and try to make out like they planned this all along, or are evil.
This is a list from Lazei from paragon, explaining how many quit, and when those who quit had joined.
-14 after DS
Not as accurate but along the lines of: 5 MC, 1 Vanilla Naxramas, 6 Ulduar, 2 FL
So you just lost 14 members, atleast 10 of these had been with you for atleast a full expansion, while atleast 5 have been there since vanilla.
Now you have to recruit atleast 14 new people, hope that they got the same skill, dedication and time.
Now you have to limit this search to about 1% of the wow playerbase due to language barriers.
Now you have to limit this search to a very marginal amount of players that actually applied
Now you have to limit this search to a even smaller marginal who passed the apply, actually had good experience from before
Now you have to limit this search to a even smaller marginal who passed the apply, and preformed well during test runs and such.
So, what do you do if you can't find the people you are looking for? They maybe just wasn't good enough, didn't have enough dedication, or changed there mind midway.
It's fairly obvious that if Paragon would have had the players of equal skll and dedication, as they had before, that they would have kept going with 25 mans, as many of them belive 25 man is more fun (various interviews) but if the choice was between during poorly in a 25 man or doing awesome in a 10 man, maybe they changed thier mind.
Your last sentence is once again so much fail. They did indeed congratulate Kin Raiders for there impressive victory, but they also said that they disliked THAT encounter, because encounter wise it was very very poorly done. They also said that they disliked how the second to last boss were alot harder then the last boss. Is it really wierd that they got annoyed at blizzard for doing that encounter that way? Have you killed it, then you should know.
Guess what, no one cares a shit about your opinion, let people have thier own instead of trying to imprint false and covered up facts to sound smart. Twisting words and trying to embrace some kind of deep conspiracy darkside shit.
Paragon has done tons of community hosted events for thier fans, they have always tried to answer as many questions as possible without loosing anything themself and they have always been dedicated, it's disguisting how you try to flush everything they have down straight down the toilet.
Why did you delete half my post out of the quote to avoid answering akward questions. I will say again
"You also said you prefer 25 mans to 10 mans. There is only one reason for dropping to 10 mans despite the fact you like 25 mans more... and that is to get world first. You know for a fact you only went 10 man so you could be ranked #1 this tier"
Comment on that instead.
I don't think that Diivii has to comment or to prove anything to you m8, especially when you are so rude.
I suggest you to chill a bit, so the rest of us can ocassionaly see a top raider coming here to post his opinion, on matters we royaly blow out of proporsion.
0/10...pathetic, thinking you know paragon inside out.
paragon > all > dead badger > you.
They have a tiny ass recruitment pool to choose from since they only pick up Finnish speaking players. End of Story. I don't understand why this isn't locked unless of course it's to pick out people who need a time out because it seems to be doing a pretty good job at that lol.
What is so hard to understand?
They recruit finnish people, and finnish people ONLY. If suddenly you have say, 10 players from your core raid group quit the game, it's close to impossible to replace those people. Hence why they went 10man.
Obviously they would rather keep the integrity of the guild keeping it 100% finnish rather than maybe compete for world first 25man with an international roster which is very understandable.
Finnish - More difficult language
10 Man - More difficult bracket
Finland - More difficult internet connections
No Bloodlust - More difficult raid comp
What more could ya ask for? This isn't just a world first... it's a world first in spite of having pretty much every disadvantage you could put on yourself! Bravo, Paragon!
I almost closed this thread earlier when I responded to it, and I should have. There isn't much to say on the subject, as Paragon themselves have stated exactly why they made the switch, and that's all there is to it.