Originally Posted by
Cerebrate
I like the argument of the Alliance getting to kill the Horde leader that both sides hate, as not being good lore for the Alliance.
How about all the lore tied up around the Horde getting a leader that they hate. That's considered good lore for the Horde?
I really don't care who gets better lore, but this constant complaining is ridiculous. No matter what lore the Alliance gets all I see is, "Well that doesn't count" or "Nobody even cared about that." But the Alliance considers every little thing the Horde does as some great, amazing piece of lore. It's just so biased it's ridiculous. I would rather see blizzard make a compelling story then try to worry about balancing lore.