1, reduce the retarded burst/CD stacking, it's just terrible design.
2, leave the mobility stuff alone, honestly who in their right mind will touch glyph of gag order anymore? remove the silence from pummel and just make throw do it, or turn it into an interrupt.
If they keep up like this, they'll turn warriors into kite kittens again, the argument is (casters need to have time to cast when they manage to get away from a warrior), well warriors need uptime on casters when we finally reach them (I'm looking at you mages).
They could also kill the remove the extra fear breaker from warriors, and leave avatar, god forbid anyone touched a mage with their 200 snares and stuns.
Our uptime on priests/warlocks is too much imo, they just can't get a warrior off themselves, while the uptime on mages is close to nonexistant.
---------- Post added 2012-10-28 at 02:04 PM ----------
I guess you don't know this.
But it takes 5 procs to hit for that much, which means he'll have to do 5 overpowers, and each one of them have to reproc which is like a 20% chance, if you're out of luck you'll eat a hit like that once a week if you pvp often, it really rarely happens.
Mages proc 4 pyro's alot more often than a warrior does a 200k+ hs, heck a mage can setup more dmg in 3 seconds on command, several times a minute.
As for warrior nerfs, they need to nerf cooldownstacking aswell as reducing their cc and their uptime on casters.
It's no fun to play as a warlock when warriors have 95% uptime on you, pretty much preventing you from casting anything but instants because anything hardcasted will either get interrupted or reflected back or you'll simply get stunned/silenced/feared.
lol the funny thing is i was thinking about this the other day. If warriors get nerfed i feel like there will be no melee able to tand up to all the strong harry potters. With no op bm hunters nobody stands up to harry potters besides other wizards.
on topic the do need to not be able to stack all dps cooldowns at once but i dont like the change to avatar.
on the topic of 200+hs i think it might need a slight damage nerf but its so rare i see it as a non issue. Mages can do insane damages if u get caught in a deep freeze.
Last edited by Mr. Casual; 2012-10-28 at 01:19 PM.
Why not remove the warrior class from the game at all? From what I see in this thread, the nerfs people are asking, that will be almost the same thing.
One class can fk all other classes except hunter, everyone accept this and say: Blizzard gave up 1v1 balance long time ago.
Now another class improve its position in PvP and others argue: no sht, I can not kill this class so easily any more, Blizzard should nerf this class.
Again, even if it happens every 20th game, no class should be able to hit someone for 80% of his HP pool.
I have no idea how warriors handle, but from what I've seen from my experience and on streams etc. Warrior's are currently over powered. Since i don't know much about warriors I'm not going to comment on what needs nerfing, I'll leave that to blizz.
Just for those warriors who likely have an inner monolog of "no no no no no no no", I do not want warriors to be nerfed to the point of being an under powered class, but I just want it so i don't see a warrior and think, "Great another one, this makes what 6 matches in a row I've seen one..." When one class is overpowered a lot of people start playing it, its just the way it is. Personally i want to see more classes than just warrior+BM hunter+Healer, it's boring to see the same overpowered classes over and over.
Anyway, I personally have no strong feelings on the matter of warriors being OP as I'm a Hpala and lets face it we need nerf's to an extent too.
But this is where we should make sure we give good feedback both from non warriors; please don't just bring out the nerf banners and say nerf them and suggest breaking the class, and warriors also need to give feedback when they know there class is overpowered (in certain situations to be fair: DK+Hpala beats warrior+BM hunter for instance :P).
This applies to all classes, we need to activly strive for a more balanced game... who am i kidding though... People who see OP classes will shout out "NERF" and those who are OP will have a lot of players shouting "NO"...
“4chan once took on the FBI and won,” a Brony told the New York Observer, “so you might say that My Little Pony is more powerful than the FBI.” Sethisto
My guess is that rogues don't even need buffs if they tone down warriors and mages.
It happens often enough that when Blizzard buffs the weak class that gets countered hard by a strong class while simultaneous nerfing the strong class that the old weak class becomes to strong.
And just reading arena junkies and I get the impression that the top players actually expected or approve of these changes.