Sweden is an odd one, they love guns but they see it as a privilege, like driving, more than an actual right to own. There's a degree of respect and responsibility for the use of fire arms there, the registration process and permit clauses are detailed.
Switzerland is an odd one, over there you don't get a choice, you're legally required to own a gun. Yet their laws are far more restrictive than those in America.
Ex-Mod. Technically retired, they just won't let me quit.
Sidetracking from the discussion now. Let's not go into semantics about who's opinion matters and who's doesn't.
We have a report button for people who are rule breaking, outside of that people's opinions are their own. Disagreeing with it does not invalidate it by default.
Ex-Mod. Technically retired, they just won't let me quit.
Since guns/knives are controlled there are very little on the streets and very little used in impulsive actions. So I'll most likely get punched in the face.
Short version of my opinion stated in all my previous posts: I would be happy with some sort of (positive) change in the US' current gun laws, and you can't deny me that opinion.
Anyways, good night everyone, I'm off.
Last edited by staart; 2012-11-10 at 05:29 AM.
It's not true.
But I hope it becomes true.
Thanks for the laughs either way.
I suspect the issue isn't so much that we have guns, as much as it is that too many who shouldn't have guns, do. Ran a range once where someone actually fell asleep on a sixty with the trigger pulled. It was bunker suppression too so the first one that ran up got a leg full of 7.62. However, if the owner is responsible, accountable, and takes proper care of his tools? Then I see no reason not to let him have weaponry. Its good to wish for a better world. Even better to work towards it too. However, until humanity kills the various breeds of monsters that nestle within ourselves. There will be times when having, and using, a firearm is not only appropriate, but downright justifiable.
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
--- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.
You're assuming the guy broke into your home with the intent of causing physical harm on you and/or your family. If someone breaks into your home at night, unless you made some SERIOUS enemies off the people you met in the past, 99 out of 100 the guy is just in there to take your possessions, with no intention of ever disturbing you or your family's sleep.
"Take whatever you want and leave" works well in these cases. Now if you pull out a gun to that guy, you don't get to claim 'I'm protecting my family', because your family was never the thief's intention. All he wants is to get some loot, and leave. You're just protecting physical property, much different than the 'protecting your family' you claim.
Use. Appropriate. Force.
A majority of card-carrying NRA members actually support reasonable gun controls. One can assume these people don't listen to Al Jones.
So out of all the of the "issues" we're facing, you pick guns as the deal breaker?
I'm all for reasonable people being allowed to have guns to hunt with and to protect themselves/family if it ever came to that.
Not every person should just be able to get a gun/permit whenever they feel like it tho. Stricter gun controls aren't a bad thing if all you're trying to do is protect people you love.
Last edited by Varyk; 2012-11-10 at 05:37 AM.
This is one of the biggest global perceptions about American gun law. You mention Americans and guns and you get the mental image of a sterotype redneck shooting off for the sake of LOUD NOISES, who tries to solve every problem conceivable by using a gun.
Alternatively you get the gangster/rapper image of every kid having a 9mm stuffed in his trousers and thinking guns solve disputes in a quicker and easier way than any alternative would.
Now in both instances there are examples that back the stereotype, but they don't reflect the status quo, however America is perceived as somewhat lax and reckless with gun responsibility.
Ex-Mod. Technically retired, they just won't let me quit.
Also had one where a guy shot someone breaking into his neighbor's house that turned out to be his kid. Plus the guy who broke up an attempted shooting spree by yelling and throwing furniture at the shooter. Lets not forget all the gun violence happening in Mexico over the last couple of years.
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
Closing.. and here's why...
I want a gun control thread that is going to address both sides of the issue. I want a thread that is intelligent and doesnt use some crappy youtube diatribe as its source for bad information.
If someone wants to create a balanced and respectable thread then I'm game. The OP of this is just... not up to snuff for this serious topic.