Yep you're right http://i.imgur.com/lxs8j.jpg
Yep you're right http://i.imgur.com/lxs8j.jpg
YOU PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND MY PAIN!!!
No, but seriously, I could have gotten the 570 at the time I got the 560 Ti (though I DID get the MSI TFII 560 Ti OC for only $213, so that was nice... This was June 2011) and I regret it. Back then I was just like "well, WoW is like, all I play. So, why should I get a 570?
Dumbest mistake ever, since I quit WoW for good less than 2 months later...
So what do you play now than? You sound like you need more power :P
Im just happy with my 7970, altho i guess i would have also been with a 7950. But getting a 1440p screen this week so, the extra power is good. Making me more happy with the 7970 :P
But deltrus, look at it this way. Your need to upgrade is sooner --> new stuff to play with.
If I get $300-400 on Christmas, I'll buy whatever is out at the time, most likely a 660 Ti - 670. Really hoping to afford a 670.
---------- Post added 2012-12-11 at 03:28 AM ----------
Sorry forgot to answer this:
Rift and Skyrim are the two main ones.
Rift is VERY GPU-intensive, on top of VERY CPU-intensive. I barely run it even on high and I cannot get constant 60 fps unless out in one of the old zones. - The new zones for Storm Legion are very demanding.
Skyrim I'd like to go mega-mod mode on, but I feel getting a better GPU first would be a good idea.http://www.pcgamer.com/2012/11/19/skyrim-graphics-mods/
Why do you assume its an argument? Why did I have a reason to argue with you? Counter points conversation and forum threads are not "arguments", not only am I not in anyway agitated im not trying to convince you Im not having a heated discussion absolutely nothing that constitutes an argument.
If you want an argument Ill say your wrong, facts are facts its Gk104 all chips of the line are too similar to each other to even remotely start a this is closer to this argument, the mobile performance is probably on par w/ the 670 but they are both as similar to 680's as each other, that and the fact that they start 680 and make every subsequent gpu from the top model on down.
Milkshake, no one was ever talking about the 670M. People were talking about the 680M, which is a totally different chip, it's essentially an underclocked FULL GTX 670.
Yea? I said the 670m is the GPU he was thinking of, it is infact old tech w/ a pretty decent power improvement, stating its closer to a 580 than an actual 6xx chip. Not once did I make some statement of the 680m being an underclocked 670, nor was I the one to sayWhich is horribly inaccurate and if your cosigning a mod just because he is a mod then sure you go for it, changes nothing in the factual world that the 680 and 670 are already more closely related than just about anything, so then if a 680m is more closely related to a 670 than a 680 WTF is he referring too? The architecture is identical from 660-680, with minor things to make them "midgrade - Highend".On account of it being Fermi, yes. But not GTX 580, no.
The GTX 680M is more closely related to the GTX 670 than the GTX 680 which was my point.
Atleast read that I said the 670 is closer to a 580 which was just pointing out that the 680 was NOT on the fermi list, but an actual GK104 chip but along w/ the desktop products the 104 had problems w/ yields leading to money loss, but releasing notebooks than strangely have very minor differences in GPU power makes it an even larger money drain, need to have pricepoints that are valid.