Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst
1
2
3
  1. #41
    The Patient Leyowin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Mountains
    Posts
    349
    25M Heroic
    10M Normal
    Overall, fury is in a good place. Not sure what you're getting at?
    Raer Stormreaver-US
    Originally Posted by Bashiok (Blue Tracker)
    Moon is sheep. Let it be written.

  2. #42
    Low dps, wat?

    http://raidbots.com/dpsbot/

    Fury is #2 on all parses @ 25 man heroic raids and #3 @ 25 man normal raids.

  3. #43
    it still makes me laugh that people see fury highest on BiS sims and then go it en masse, with the gear most people have i can almost guarantee they would get more as arms, pre 2 set i got today i was simming 81k as arms and 78k as fury and i can be certain the gap is wider now (25% MS boost > 25% BT boost) and im 387, not only that but the rng as fury is stupid, sure you see higher numbers on WoL, but you see higher WoL for fire mages, but guess what, frost is equal to fire, thats how rng specs work, you shouldnt spec so that you have a 1 in a 1000 or more chance to do stupid numbers you should spec for consistancy, and fury does not have it.
    Damosapien - DPS(whatever spec is better in that teir)/prot Warrior http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/characte...apien/advanced
    Damodrood - Resto/feral(hybrid) Druid http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/characte...drood/advanced
    Damoo - Blood/frost Death knight http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/characte...r/Damoo/simple

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Damosapien View Post
    it still makes me laugh that people see fury highest on BiS sims and then go it en masse, with the gear most people have i can almost guarantee they would get more as arms, pre 2 set i got today i was simming 81k as arms and 78k as fury and i can be certain the gap is wider now (25% MS boost > 25% BT boost) and im 387, not only that but the rng as fury is stupid, sure you see higher numbers on WoL, but you see higher WoL for fire mages, but guess what, frost is equal to fire, thats how rng specs work, you shouldnt spec so that you have a 1 in a 1000 or more chance to do stupid numbers you should spec for consistancy, and fury does not have it.
    Arms simmed a little higher for me, so I switched to it. Couldn't stand it for some reason, it just didn't fit me. Switched back despite simming lower. RNG is a bitch but something I'm willing to deal with, as it's nowhere near fire mage level. And to be fair, Arms has its RNG aspects as well.

    I play Fury because I enjoy it.

  5. #45
    I have no idea why you consider Fury RNG. You have 20 seconds to proc 2 raging blows. Every other CS you only need 1 and use berserker rage. So if you can't figure this out it is you and not the spec.

    All I can say is, learn the spec before you call RNG as the culprit.
    Gloryhogs
    25 Man 7 HOURS/Week
    Strugglebus

  6. #46
    Quote Originally Posted by Strah View Post
    Well I don't really see any imminent issues either but to be fair here we should mention that there is a shitload of encounters that play exactly towards our strengths which probably won't be always the case.
    Quote Originally Posted by Damosapien View Post
    you shouldnt spec so that you have a 1 in a 1000 or more chance to do stupid numbers you should spec for consistancy, and fury does not have it.
    Don't really agree. There are of course those tries where really nothing goes and it might be worse than for other specs and classes but I don't feel that it is as bad as you make it out to be looking over a whole evening of progress.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •