I pull perfectly reasonable numbers for my class lol. I play Surv/BM and my DPS is fine, but there's no reason to take a hunter over a fire mage for, say, Elegon (the fight I was sat on mostly). And we have plenty of reason to cry foul, our best spec is middle of the road AS A PURE DPS CLASS. That's a serious problem.
However, feel free to keep assuming the reason I'm sat is because I'm bad.
Your opinion is obviously not compatible with the guilds, why don't you just find another guild where everyone plays whatever they want?
Where would you draw the line btw? Is it fine for a healer to say that they find healing boring and come to a raid in dps spec/gear?
For as long as the guild is downing bosses and progressing further, not hitting enrage timers, it doesn't matter if you're playing the most optimal spec or not.
If you're hitting enrage timers on normal mode chances are more likely the raid is having other problems than the most optimal spec.
The day your raid does everything to down a boss and it's just barely not enough, is the day I might consider changing.
Everything you said is accurate, but some people play better with a spec that's not the optimal one. I don't know much about locks cause I never played one, but if a guy is able to pull more dps with a spec that he enjoys, I'd just say go for it. Sure, if you're hardcore you can tell this guy to fuck off or L2P the optimal spec because you're only going to take the best of the best, but in a casual guild kicking someone for this reason is just silly to me. Some people perform better on shittier specs.
Just out of curiousity, why is playing a certain spec wrong? Perhaps I am misunderstanding the wording or not able to see your point... but you don't need to play the flavour-of-the-month spec to play the class "correctly". If you understand the concept of the class and it's mechanisms an individual can outplay any other spec, that's the joys for a multi-DPS specc'd class...
Assuming on the path that spec dictates the correct-playing of the class does that mean hybrid class i.e tank, healer, DPS should change specs? Like Brewmaster Monks are doing better DPS then Windwalkers... does that mean according to your statement they should all reroll Brewmasters? ^^;;.
The problem is WHY wouldn't you care to do the maximum potential of your class? You are 100% correct that it's very uncommon (except for those sub 1% wipes, in which point I want to kick the teeth in of every person who didn't pot twice during the fight) for one person to bring the entire raid down unless they are someone 10k+ dps behing the rest of the group.
Oh wait, you answered my question. You said it yourself, you "don't care" about the other people in the raid. If you are topping the meters as destro btw, I hope the rest of your group composes of classes in healing specs but doing DPS because that shouldn't be the case unless you severely outgear them.
The problem isn't when you still down bosses either, I hope you didn't take it as me saying that. The problem is you start looking into things when you are dying to enrage timers, hence all the above things come into play.
Finally, you don't have to be in a "highly competitive" guild (although I was under the impression by nature we are all competitive) to care about at least TRYING to do the maximum your class offers.
By that logic blood legion is a more casual guild than most progression guilds. Simply because they spend an extreme amount of hours the first week(s) of progression followed by 1-2 raid nights for the rest of that tier, resulting in a lesser overall amount of time commitment.
Sorry for changing that brilliant title.
Please talk in a civilised manner, thanks.
This was my thinking. If his guild is casual, that means the other DPS probably aren´t really doing top dps either. Even if your desired spec isn´t the best dps spec at the moment, there should be enough wiggle-room for you to be able to do competitive dps in a casual guild.
I believe we are only hearing one side of the story, or more likely, you are just a bad dps and your spec has only a smart part to play in it.
What is your definition of baddie ooc? It's definitely difference than the majority of players in the game apparently.
Baddie = shit dps, stands in all the pretty colors, etc.
I guess you might be one of those people who determines someone skill by the gear they wear or something? Shit dps is not tied directly to gear, more often than not actually it's tied to someone not understanding how to play their class.
I hope you realize you are essentially (after the first 2-4 weeks of content being released) calling top 20 guilds, casuals (which by your definition means baddies) right? You do realize top guilds clear content that other guilds raids 4-7 days, in 2-3 hours right?
I never stated I was destro, I said several times I was Demonology, it's in the post you quoted... Way to read my post!
The reason I play Demonology is as I described before, because I don't feel comfortable with Affliction, not in the slightest. And I can definitely understand that someone prefers Destruction over Demonology and Affiction as well.
I've learned my class and do well with it, but I'm not going to say that I do my best because I'm not. That would involve loads of testing, research, again testing, to tinker up the damage with 0.X % or maaaybe a couple of %, such low numbers that it won't even make a difference. That's the part I can't be arsed about, neither can anyone else in my guild. All of us know our class and spec, but nobody uses simcraft to maximize it to the absolute best, yet we still down bosses and progress further!
I wonder why that is...
It's entirely possible that we're not hearing the whole thing but here's my logic: If he is a terrible player or just a jerk in raid or something then why are they asking him to switch specs? If he's a jerk spec won't make a difference obviously and if he's just doing terrible DPS then changing spec won't change that, it's almost always a problem with understanding fundamental class mechanics or rotation, changing spec doesn't change how they understand the class.
Because as soon as a "optimal" specced player of your class comes along you should (and most likely would) get sat/replaced by him. Just because you can't pull higher numbers in the "best" (current) spec of your class doesn't mean you are "better" than someone who can play the "top" spec and pull higher numbers than your "highest" in the sub-optimal spec.
Yup, in fact, logic would dictate that, when comparing two guilds who clear the same content, the guild that takes the LEAST amount of time raiding is better since that means they spent less time wiping and took less time to learn and understand the mechanics. The amount of time someone spends means nothing in terms of skill.
---------- Post added 2012-11-22 at 03:24 PM ----------
When it's simply not fun? Take arcane mages in Cata. They were incredible DPS but who really wants to play a spec that isn't fun? Many went fire since it was actually enjoyable to play. When all specs can at least perform then casual raiders shouldn't be made to choose a spec they don't enjoy.