Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ...
7
8
9
10
LastLast
  1. #161
    Quote Originally Posted by Deathquoi View Post
    I was more referring to the guy that said LFR wasn't raiding or some crap.
    LFR as raiding equels taking a stick, stringing it up with a rope, and call yourself an archer with a bow.
    A kid can do that, but it doesn't mean he really is one :P
    Everyone has so much to say
    They talk talk talk their lives away

  2. #162
    Well.. I wouldn't call anyone who don't have the ds hc achievements a raider.
    I didn't have the achievements for DS heroic but I am a raider, I quit after the first week of DS cause it was crap.

  3. #163
    Seems to be a common issue. First we were on Spirit Kings HC, we wiped for 60-90 minutes. Had the last boss down to 40% after like 8-10 pulls. Yet people were all like "omg lets skip this". Really, I am used to spending weeks progressing, wiping to a boss for hours and hours. People nowadays seems to expect a boss to die after 30 mintues or its unkillable. "We lack the gear", no you don't lack the gear, your just terrible.

  4. #164
    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly33 View Post
    Seems to be a common issue. First we were on Spirit Kings HC, we wiped for 60-90 minutes. Had the last boss down to 40% after like 8-10 pulls.
    I'm in a guild lax enough to be called "casual" in the bad way on forums like this and 10 pulls isn't a big deal for progression. Spending three hours straight doing Elegon before leaving for the night is annoying but not something to give up over. Besides, it's heroic. If you're not in a world's first aiming guild then you really should take a few days worth of attempts to get past the harder heroic bosses.
    Praise the Quest Writers for they give life to otherwise boring expansions.

  5. #165
    Raiders give up so easily because of LFR. Why do all this crap to down normal and heroic stuff when I can have a fun non stress inducing run, and down everything in 1-2 attempts and get pretty much the same gear. All in less time. Some people play for fun, some want to make it their life. There are a lot less of the latter.
    Quote Originally Posted by Extremity View Post
    I like turtles. I would like turtle-based tier sets. I would like a turtle shell helmet, and perhaps a cheeseburger backpack and a chestpiece that simply places a red gemstone on my bellybutton.

  6. #166
    All I have gathered from this thread is that a raider can be someone who makes a livelihood gunning for world firsts, OR somebody who tries to pug year old content.

    If you look at it that way, it's pretty easy to understand why "Raiders give up so easily" - it's because you're talking about the raiders who give up easily.

    inb4 "Why do raiders NEVER give up?" thread pops up

  7. #167
    Quote Originally Posted by Otiswhitaker View Post
    This is not exclusive to old content. This is what used to happen when pugs were more common (Like back when ICC was current). One death, everything falls apart.
    Which, ironically, meant that a PuG actually had to be better than an organized group to clear the same number of bosses. The PuG had to one-shot everything. The organized group could wipe for nights on the same boss,

  8. #168
    Quote Originally Posted by rayden54 View Post
    Which, ironically, meant that a PuG actually had to be better than an organized group to clear the same number of bosses.
    What a great point! When I used to (fairly) successfully pug 10 mans, I spent anywhere from an hour and a half to 2 hours just FORMING the group, knowing that one weak link would result in a terribly unsuccessful raid. Oh the disappointment when that awesome mage you found had dial-up internet =/ ("that mage" haunts me to this day! haha)

  9. #169
    High Overlord Ragu4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Lone Oak, TX
    Posts
    145
    And why does Professor Oak sound like Tristan Taylor from Yu Gi Oh the abridged series now? But on topic, never had too much trouble with the whole giving up scenario, then again I only raided in BC and WOTLK, played Cata for bout a month and leveled my derp knight to 90 then got bored. For a breakdown in my wrath days: it was quite impossible to fail in naxx, so no issues there. Ulduar was different, due to sheer length most pug groups I was with ended up stopping during the antechamber, maybe two bosses in, normally hodir for a chance at some rare cache loot and Thorim cause it was easy (never did iron council with a pug), had some failures there but since most people liked the raid, again at least for me, most people stuck around. For me it started getting bad around ToC. Basically if the group failed at the worms, chances the raid breaks up right then and there. Failure at the yeti was normally ok, and the group stuck around. Second boss is a pushover, which is good because when we reached the champs I knew we were finishing, good morale boost that second boss. ICC, again it wasn't that people qq dropped, it was that people didn't want to deal with putricide or sindragosa. First four in like 45 minutes, then festergut and rotface, then the blood jersey shore douches, and finally venereal disease. If the group stuck it out that far then maybe we would try the blood bitch.

    TL;DR, why does professor oak sound like tristian from YGOTAS and for me it was more about length then quitting.

    P.S. You didn't pug BC raids cept Kara, for me again.

  10. #170
    To answer the question in the title:

    For the majority of players, since WotLK. That was the beginning of the "let's just wait until its nerfed" mentality.

    Caveat: actually, we saw a little glimmer when people gave up on Sunwell when they announced they would have raid-wide nerfs because people were crying about M'uru being too hard. Folks that struggled through BT/Hyjal stood no chance in SWP, so instead of wiping night after night, they just sat back and waited because of the early nerf announcement.

    "There are two types of guys in this world. Guys who sniff their fingers after scratching their balls, and dirty fucking liars." -StylesClashv3
    "Elo Hell is where the Ego is greater than the Elo." -Bystekhilcar

  11. #171
    The Insane det's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The forums
    Posts
    17,520
    Quote Originally Posted by Novamh View Post
    ..... and its ruining the game.

    /rant
    Chalk one more up on the list of things that ruin the game.

    Seriously..with a PuG? Not surprising at all. Don't give raiders a bad name by calling that group "raiders"
    Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
    One cause is a cognitive bias called projection bias. Essentially living inside your own head your entire life makes it exceedingly difficult to understand how others do not also live your same life, think your same thoughts, and hold your same beliefs. In many cases it's quite frustrating to try to empathize and understand why you yourself may not be the center of the universe, which generally results in one 'acting out' in various ways.
    So, in short: the internet.

  12. #172
    A raid is 10 - 40 people working together. I am yet to see that happen in LFR...

    In LFR "every man for himself" rings a familiar bell.

  13. #173
    Quote Originally Posted by nyc81991 View Post
    Again. LFR requires no thought. You aren't pushing content you are showing up to collect free gear.

    Blizzard has said it themselves, LFR is for people who can not be Raiders. You keep saying I am making this up when the company who makes the game says this.

    Your idea of what a raider is happens to be different than the term that is widely accepted.

    Also, People who raided Mc and Naxx Were raiders. Meaning past tense.
    So I didn't care to read the rest but listen here elitest jerk my guild would use lfr when we couldn't find a couple ppl to fil the raid so I guess that made us non raiders?

  14. #174
    Quote Originally Posted by sosleapy View Post
    So I didn't care to read the rest but listen here elitest jerk my guild would use lfr when we couldn't find a couple ppl to fil the raid so I guess that made us non raiders?
    How about reading?
    You're not _not_ a raider the second you enter a lfr. But you are from just doing lfr :P
    Everyone has so much to say
    They talk talk talk their lives away

  15. #175
    Field Marshal Archypew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Azeroth
    Posts
    82
    IF its a raid, you are raiding, so you are a raider. . .
    What kind of raider , thats the difference.

  16. #176
    since Wotlk spoiled them

  17. #177
    Quote Originally Posted by Novamh View Post
    its raiding, hence you are a raider...
    HAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAANAHAHA.... No.

    Raiding implies coordinated team effort to kill a boss who is at your current gear level. You just joined a group of random people.
    Bearer... Seek... Seek... Lest...

  18. #178
    Stood in the Fire ot4ku-mh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    455
    Quote Originally Posted by Cybran View Post
    HAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAANAHAHA.... No.

    Raiding implies coordinated team effort to kill a boss who is at your current gear level. You just joined a group of random people.
    I wouldn't say "current gear level".
    A group with for example iLvl 380 progressing in BoT in Cata would have also been classified as a raid group and as raiders.
    However:
    No, just clearing LFR doesn't make you a raider. That's complete nonsense and you will understand this if you've ever been in a raid group for more than one evening. There is minimal effort, no progression and nearly no teamwork / coordination in a LFR group.

  19. #179
    Obviously my opinion doesn't mean anything to anyone but myself but I'll put my two cents in. I can write enough lines of code to make something that spits out my name when I input the letter 'Q'. Guess I should go add programmer to my resume. In my opinion, classifying yourself as a raider requires a certain level of effort. Destroying a lvl 60 raid with 5 of your friends doesn't really count as raiding, yes you are in a raid group, yes the instance you are in was considered a raid but you aren't playing the content as it was intended. You aren't raiding you're facerolling... Some people consider doing LFR makes them a raider but I would never consider myself a raider for going in and half assing my way through it. If I had to arbitrarily set a line it would be doing at least LFR for the expansion you are in, so doing any raid that is designed for the current level cap. Like I said I wouldn't personally consider myself a raider for doing it but I see it as a fair enough spot to draw a line.
    Last edited by Najja; 2012-12-10 at 03:00 PM.

  20. #180
    Seriously? People really consider themselves raiders while the only thing they do is LFR? Oh my god, I always thought those people wouldn't exist...

    Currently, I'm NOT a raider. My old guild fell apart (cleared 8/8 DS hc at ~15%ish nerf with 2 raid nights a week, we started late with progression and whatnot but just so you know at what level of raider you could put me^^) and I joined a new one with the start of MoP only to realize that it's full of douches/noobs and left after the first few raids. Atm, the only thing I do, from a PvE perspective, is LFR and the occasional daily quest. This makes me a NON-raiding individual, period. LFR can't be and will never be (unless they change the very essence of it) considered raiding by any half-serious player.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •