What's the worst that can happen to you ...
Okay here's the concept, try to grasp it, I SPECIFICALLY said "It does NOT MATTER if in the OTHER GAMES I should have been punished, the FIRST GAME PROVES RIOT/THE TRIBUNAL WILL PUNISH YOU WITH TIME BANS TIME BANS FOR DOING NOTHING WRONG."
Oh my fucking God the illiteracy/refusal to read correctly on this forum drives me b@n@n@z.
edit: lots of typos oh my god
Last edited by JimPaladin; 2012-12-13 at 12:40 PM.
---------- Post added 2012-12-13 at 01:47 PM ----------
Don't look weird at us if you still don't fucking get it.
---------- Post added 2012-12-13 at 01:48 PM ----------
I admitted that two of those games were on me. Do you really think I would be starting this discussion if I really thought my behavior to be that bad in as many as 40% of my games?
It's a hypothesis based on your Tribunal case.
It doesn't have to be right or wrong from the start. It's a rough estimation. One that I wouldn't challenge so quickly if I were you.
I'll admit that I've acted like a dick in probably 20-40% of my games played. I just know how to do it without getting to deal with the repercussions of it.
---------- Post added 2012-12-13 at 02:36 PM ----------
Just to make it very clear to those that feel that they are being treated unfair in the Tribunal because of undeserved reports being in their case.
This is why the pardon button exists. Not everything that ends up in the Tribunal has to be a bannable offense. It can also just be some asshole that just doesn't like your face. If this is the case, then a pardon shall be given.
It looks like you would like the tribunal to mark specifically the games and chat lines you were banned for or something.
What's the worst that can happen to you ...
Out of sheer curiosity, how DO you find your cases? Aren't they deliberately meant to be kept hidden?
Casual, with a capital''C''.
Pokemon FC: 1993-8365-9328
In the WoD Beta... o.o
"It does not matter that in all other cases I should have been punished, if in one of them I am innocent it means I got punished for nothing"
HOLY FUCK. How, how, how, how HOW stupid a person has to be to see this that way. It does NOT matter if you were innocent in 99 out of 100 of games you were reported in. Yes, people report for nothing, big news. I've been reported for going 1/3/1 in mid or for not warding the mid lane as support. HOWEVER this is not what you get banned for(at least I never got banned for it. Magic?). Those are just reports that got in the tribunal case despite being baseless, and those are the vast majority. However, it's that one game in which you spammed "noob", told your team to go fuck themselves and yelled more profanity than a 15 year old showing off to friends is what you got punished for, and rightfully so. Do you figure you ramp up some positive karma while acting acceptably that eventually allows you to just go batshit once in a while and destroy someone's game by being a toxic asshole? It does not work that way.
Unless, of course, I wasn't pardoned in one or more of those 3 cases in which my remarks we, the fine people of the MMO-Champion discussion boards, agree were more innocuous than toxic, in which case you'll agree the Tribunal erred in its ruling.
i think you are way to worried about your behavior. i participate in Tribunals almost daily. i love the game, but cant stand poor sportsman like conduct. but, that doesnt mean just because the case is there, that i automatically vote to punish. ive seen plenty of cases with little to no proof of the offense they were reported for, im fair, i hit pardon. i like to have a high success rating. it doesnt serve me any good to just punish, punish, punish.
but yah, dont act like a prick and you have nothing to worry about.. even if you have a bad day.. and things slip, so long as its not habitual you wont get perma banned. unless you go totally bat-shit crazy on somebody. but i think even you could agree if you did.. you should be banned. if you lash out a tiny bit, you might get a few days cooling off vacation. be proactive vent your frustration on the forums here (ever had a bad game...) is a good place. instead of going off on the person in game.
Those 5 games are an entirety of one case. Your judgement is not carried out one game at a time, in a tribunal case you get anywhere between 2 and 5(6?) games and you judge them all at once. You do not press punish/pardon one game at a time, you get a variety of games to look at and you punish or pardon based on the actions in all of them. Let's say 3 of the reports were for nothing, that does not change the fact that 2 of them were justified, and it's for those 2 the case has been punished.
I have, in fact, ventured in there once or twice, and I remember how it works, because you jolted my memory.
That said, my point stands. I was punished based on 5 cases, 3 of which we agree weren't individually punishable (even though the punishment is based on the 5 cases collectively, not individually). If I were deciding on what to do with someone, I'd weigh the true accusations (the bad cases) against the false accusations (the cases we agree were wrongly reported). Since 3 outweighs 2, I'd pardon.
If not so, how does a Tribune think?
It's really simple and it's something I, eventually, learned - ignore them. I mean it. Go into the scoreboard and hit mute. As soon as I feel like someone is going to be a problem in chat, I mute them.
Last edited by FrenchieKDC; 2012-12-13 at 02:14 PM.