Oh yes, there is an attempt at relevance. This is a fourteen year old protecting his siblings and homestead with a handgun from an armed intruder months ago. Of course while the NRA guy was ranting, someone else was killing three people in Pennsylvania. Neither is a wacko killing his mother, taking her not nearly secured well enough apparently but legally purchased semiautomatic rifle to a school, and killing twenty kids in their classroom.
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
Why it was posted is irrelevant. It's related to the current gun debate. Motive from the poster is meaningless unless he concocted the story somehow and fooled several news outlets to run with it.
If an eight month article about a legal gun owner killing fifteen people were posted, would you shrug off the age of the article? I think you would.
---------- Post added 2012-12-23 at 01:24 AM ----------
We don't isolate immigrants. Companies and governments bend over backwards to accommodate language barriers. Many new immigrants tend to stick together. Their children are the bridge and they start integrating at a fairly young age.
Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.
What part of "when properly handled by people educated on their use and gun safety" did you fail to grasp? She didn't keep her weapons secured, she was being stupid and paid the price.
And she wasn't a gun enthusiast per se, she was a survivalist/doomsday prepper.
---------- Post added 2012-12-22 at 11:11 PM ----------
Here and there. Lived in a few places, and consider myself one of those eurotrash "world citizens" - I currently reside in the United States, atm.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
So since he didn't kill the intruder, now we're going to get probably a sad case of the intruder suing the boy and his family...
In all seriousness though, good thing he shot the intruder, I'd have done the same and likely finished him as well.
I'd be really, really surprised if there have been any photos leaked from Sandy Hook already. For one, heads would absolutely roll if it did happen, and for two, there are unfortunately areas of the internet salivating at the prospect and they would have vetted and spread them around if there were.
That being said, I don't doubt in the slightest that someone is trying to pass unrelated photos off as being legitimate.
Yes because armed intruders normally bang the door a bit then they enter the house and murder kids, they do like to take their time at doors. Good logic there. Also as a rational person one that has been taught in a democratic 21th century country, why didn't the kid call the police first? We are taught that here since young, when something bad is about to happend call the police then try to defend yourself.
In a strict gun regulated country the intruder 9/10 times would not even have a gun but another weapon (maybe a knife lets say), the kid would have baricaded the door and called the police. And the police would delt with the guy and im sure as he will soon noticed, outguned by the police he could either surrender or run, or put up a fight, ending with him being shoot but by the police not by a kid.
Not to mention since here a gun permit is that expensive and hard to get, a cheaper protection for your home would be contract with a sectury company + cameras + good locks on doors. So in cases like this, home invasions, push the button, close the door and hold tight untill the security car comes. It's by far the best investment and it tops any gun owning on house protection.
Last edited by mmoc0127ab56ff; 2012-12-23 at 09:11 AM.
Oh please, this statement is completely dense. You can be well educated in gun safety and gun handling and go out on a shooting spree just the same. Guns are made for killing, there is no difference morally from shooting an animal to shooting a human being. Also, the CT shooter was educated in the use of firearms, his mom took him shooting at the gun range as a "bonding experience". There is nothing to stop you from using the skills you acquire about how to use a gun, on other people. In fact that's exactly what a gun is for
Because a 14 year old boy getting into a potential gunfight with 2 adults, atleast one of them armed, is much safer.
I don't know about you, but if an armed robber broke into my house I would much rather call the police and hide instead of risking my life trying to fight him off. My life is more important to me than the things in my house.
You're assuming a lot of things not in the article. He got his younger siblings upstairs, doesn't say when police were called. It does say that the door was forced open and the armed guy was coming up the stairs though.
First time I read the story, I thought maybe the lady was fleeing the guy with the gun rather than an accomplice, possibly the guy kicked in the door looking for her, but none of that is stated in the article, nor does it matter for the safety of the children.
---------- Post added 2012-12-23 at 11:48 AM ----------
The most expensive things in my house are my guns, but if I use my guns to defend my guns, they might put them in evidence and I might not have them!
Oh, the conundrum!