oh come on....

[Deleted]

was missleading as we were looking for hard numbers tbh but yes can understand.

[Deleted]

i see youre now in colombia. keep taking the drugs, dude

[Deleted]

but to keep on track was no nerf. except silencing shot and just live with it :P

[yurano]

To be honest, Silencing Shot was too powerful. Hunters already have a ton of CCs (Trap, Silencing, Scatter) and you get one more if you're BM. Plus, Silencing Shot is more powerful than a standard interrupt, pretty reasonable that it got nerfed. We should all petition that Blizzard also nerfs Spear Hand Strike. That spell is truly overpowered.

Lmao hunter got buffed if anything for PvE, slight PvP nerf but who cares. If you want to whine about a class getting nerfed go laugh at Warlocks.

And Frost Mages. No more Deep Freeze + Ice Lance x3.

[Deleted]

To be honest, Silencing Shot was too powerful. Hunters already have a ton of CCs (Trap, Silencing, Scatter) and you get one more if you're BM. Plus, Silencing Shot is more powerful than a standard interrupt, pretty reasonable that it got nerfed. We should all petition that Blizzard also nerfs Spear Hand Strike. That spell is truly overpowered.



And Frost Mages. No more Deep Freeze + Ice Lance x3.

This basically sums up this whole thread and the OP is a bit stupid in what he was saying.

[Tehterokkar]

To be honest, Silencing Shot was too powerful. Hunters already have a ton of CCs (Trap, Silencing, Scatter) and you get one more if you're BM. Plus, Silencing Shot is more powerful than a standard interrupt, pretty reasonable that it got nerfed. We should all petition that Blizzard also nerfs Spear Hand Strike. That spell is truly overpowered.



And Frost Mages. No more Deep Freeze + Ice Lance x3.

How was Silencing too powerful? Comparing that to Mage's Counterspell: Less Duration on Silence, Less lockout duration, 4 sec lower CD.
And to top it off, Mages don't have to choose between it and other CC.

[thunderdragon2]

any1 know what glyph would be useful for a pve BM hunter now that marked for death is gone?

erm can some1 tell me when silencing shot became a cc plz?

[Vouksh89]

How was Silencing too powerful? Comparing that to Mage's Counterspell: Less Duration on Silence, Less lockout duration, 4 sec lower CD.
And to top it off, Mages don't have to choose between it and other CC.

That's going to be removed. Said in the official patch notes.

[Deleted]

How was Silencing too powerful? Comparing that to Mage's Counterspell: Less Duration on Silence, Less lockout duration, 4 sec lower CD.
And to top it off, Mages don't have to choose between it and other CC.

Improved counter spell is also being removed from mages.

any1 know what glyph would be useful for a pve BM hunter now that marked for death is gone?

erm can some1 tell me when silencing shot became a cc plz?

The new dissengage glyph on some fights would be good as thats around a 20k heal and is better than nothing.

[thunderdragon2]

Improved counter spell is also being removed from mages.




The new dissengage glyph on some fights would be good as thats around a 20k heal and is better than nothing.

hmm cool,

do u know what glyph was removed and replaced with aimed shot in 5.1 as i looked at my surv spec for the 1st time since the pre mop patch and i noticed that 1 there and its useless to me?

[Lovestar]

They combined the glyphs that made Scatter and Freezing remove dots when applied. Scatter turned into Aimed.

[thunderdragon2]

They combined the glyphs that made Scatter and Freezing remove dots when applied. Scatter turned into Aimed.

hmm i don't remember having the scater glyph on but as i said i didnt look at my surv spec since the pre mop patch ty tho

[Deleted]

hmm cool,

do u know what glyph was removed and replaced with aimed shot in 5.1 as i looked at my surv spec for the 1st time since the pre mop patch and i noticed that 1 there and its useless to me?

nah didnt play hunter pre mop only played TBC wrath and panda :P

find patch 5.1 changes on WoW Website then

[Xeraxis]

read the editted part of the previous post and marvel at my brilliance

I was not aware that you chose not to use Hunter's Mark in PvP and relied solely on the glyph to accomplish marking for you. That is unless you were not aware that Hunter's Mark existed without glyph. Either scenario just shows you have no clue about your class.

[Deleted]

either way still not a solid 5% DPS increase as they can dispell. its more of a tool to potentially increase DPS by 5%

[Deleted]

either way still not a solid 5% DPS increase as they can dispell. its more of a tool to potentially increase DPS by 5%

I don't think I get what you mean, but dispelling only HM will be a waste of mana since you'll just reapply it a second later. ^^

[Deleted]

I don't think I get what you mean, but dispelling only HM will be a waste of mana since you'll just reapply it a second later. ^^

well if your playing 3s (what classes are balanced around)

as a hunter you may be chain CC'd to burst another team mate down.

therefore removing HM for this 20+ second period would be usefull.

[Tehstool]

well if your playing 3s (what classes are balanced around)

as a hunter you may be chain CC'd to burst another team mate down.

therefore removing HM for this 20+ second period would be usefull.

If you (the hunter) is being chain CCed why would the need to dispel hunter's mark if you can't attack? Your allies won't benefit from hunter's mark unless if you have another hunter.

[Deleted]

dude wtf.. now the hunter in 5.2 will be more nerf.............why blizzard just delete the hunter class..... -.-''

This is the reason why democracy couldn't really work.

[Deleted]

If you (the hunter) is being chain CCed why would the need to dispel hunter's mark if you can't attack? Your allies won't benefit from hunter's mark unless if you have another hunter.

yeah but diminishing returns would come into effect and removing it may help.

tbh not really any reason to dispell it just trying to say its not a solid 5% DPS increase cos things can happen.