Those are right-wing. Communism is left-wing.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...l-spectrum.png
Keep The Beats!
It can be a little confusing because the definitions have flipped in recent years and it really depends upon what you are talking about. Social issues always take a back seat when discussing government types though, which means anarchists are always far right on the spectrum. Social issues can make the waters more murky but this is really only valid towards the center of the spectrum where the differences are already murky. The classic spectrum goes Anarchist-Libertarian-Constitutionalist-Republican-Democrat-Socialist-Green-Facist-Communist by how much government control each wants(this includes social issues). This is reversed now that the terminology has changed(liberal used to be aligned with very Libertarian principles of little to no government and a heavy focus on property rights of individuals).
It can all be very confusing but technically, stances that are pro gay marriage and anti-drug war are right wing stances as well as liberal(modern and classical) ones. The terminology and rhetoric has just really muddied these terms and made them a nightmare to navigate.
Someone is probably going to attack me about this but so be it. If you watch Fox's news programs the ones that are on in the morning during the week. They are really well balanced as far as democrat vrs republican and their moderators will ask questions of both to keep the discussion going. This is better than what I have seen on other news networks at the same time of day. Both get turned on in our break room at work. The difference is that they take shows like the O'Rieley Factor and call it news and use it to make these claims. Those shows are for entertainment just like Pierce Morgan's show is on the other network. Try watching some of their actual news and not the commentary shows that are in the evening and you will see the difference.
I agree. Fox News is a mess and constantly hyping stupid shit. That said, they are the only news network that is willing to challenge authority as it appeals to their base and as a result is the network I watch/listen to if I am stuck in a situation where I need to choose between cable news channels. I don't even have tv but I listen to them on XM radio during my commute sometimes and although they often make me grumpy for stupid social issue crap they are the only ones that the vast overreaching of politicians in DC. Sure, it fits their Republican agenda, but challenging authority should be the #1 priority of all news outlets not just 1.
While they didn't challenge Bush until the end of his presidency(which I believe contributed to his abysmal end of term poll numbers) they were a very new station still wrapped up in 9-11 bullshit, so who knows, maybe they would be different under another president. If they follow the model talk radio has taken in the last 8 years, they would be very critical of all power(talk radio was far from friendly to Romney until very close to the election).
No they just dont report things that go against their agenda is what they do. If its not beneficial for libers they just ignore it so it seems like they are factual. Fox does some bad reporting but people on the other stations ignore things. I cant tell you how many times on bill mahr i see a republican make a really good economical point which he makes some off topic joke and he changes the subject. The news isnt news but propaganda. Its all of them, they just do it differently.
As far as I remember it's against the forum rules to talk about politics and religion. So, not only do we have both as well as constant bashing and harassment and fighting posts but we also have moderators involved. I report dozens of people for the blatant attacks and nothing happens. Just another day of bias on mmo champ.
Pretty simple really: FOX is to stupid to know it's right from it's left. Mystery solved.
This sounds like a typical whistle blower here considering I have been talking in the political threads when they were up pre-election. If you don't like political discussion here then don't read them. And this isn't really a religious discussion because we aren't talking about how the WBC came to be or what they believe in. We are talking about them being disrespectful to people that died, be it soldiers or the children at Sandy Hook. If you don't like it, kindly leave the thread and don't read it.
Actually, politics are very specifically allowed on the off topic forums. There were even two political stickies up for over a year that were entirely based on politics. As for religion, it's more of a gray area, but generally unless you talk about religion itself, as in the specific beliefs or saying "christians are stupid lawl" or what have you, than skirting the edges is fine.
If you have a significant problem with how things are run on the forum, there is nothing to keep you here. Why stay on a site that apparently makes you miserable?
MMO-Champion Rules and Guidelines ___________________ General Off-topic Guidelines Addendum
"If you must mount the gallows, give a jest to the crowd, a coin to the hangman, and make the drop with a smile on your lips"
Birgitte Silverbow
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Quoting again for visibility. WBC hates gays but that doesn't make them a conservative. What if a person is fine with gay people but is against unions and pro no government control for organization? What if an atheist is pro abortion but hates gay people, does that make him a liberal?
Hating on gay people does not make a person/organization conservative.
Loving gay people does not make a person/organization liberal.
there ok with there table being there