I'm not sure how this is even a question. Simple common sense solves this one.
Use common sense and stop being bureaucratic fuckwits, for fuck's sake. Examine the facts, if it is blindingly obious he is a donor, exempt him from child support - simple as that. It is not hard to solve, people just need to stop being dumbasses.
"The truth, my goal."
I dislike Fox news too, but man, you could at least try reading it to see if they're spinning it really hard. It's not like they spin everything, they just spin the things that they need to in order to appeal to their target audience. If a case already fits this, they don't need to do anything.
I was going to complain about how terrible of an OP that was, but I got enough laughs out of the story...after clicking the link to see wtf I was even looking at.
"...after responding to the women’s Craigslist ad for a donor..."
Ya, that is always the best idea. Maybe don't give your sperm out willy nilly to strangers that you meet on Craigslist. And wtf were these people up to looking for another kid if they have 8!?
Why do people want more kids if they can't afford to take care of themselves!!??!!??!!??
I like sandwiches
It's a shitty situation, but those are the facts. Perhaps they can come to some sort of arrangement where the couple give him the money every month and it comes out of his bank account, though that might be far more contact than the three of them wanted. That said, they got themselves into this situation by using a sperm donor from Craigslist. The likelihood of problems was fairly high when they decided to go ahead with what they did.
Did you like the above post? How about sending me a dollar? I'd have adverts here but apparently that'd break ToS.
Also, the state is doing this so it can recover its money from having to pay for the women. They need the money, but the state is seeking it from him because it doesn't want to pay.
Last edited by v2prwsmb45yhuq3wj23vpjk; 2012-12-31 at 10:21 PM.
A sperm donor is giving a woman who, for whatever reason is unable to concieve, a gift; you shouldn't slap them in the face for doing that.
Stuff like this is why were bankrupt as a nation, how much do you think this is costing taxpayers?
---------- Post added 2012-12-31 at 11:09 PM ----------
"Even though the couple has a signed agreement with Marotta, the state is arguing the validity of the agreement because a doctor did not handle the artificial insemination as required by state law. Hannah Schroller, Marotta’s attorney is attempting to have the case dismissed. Arguments will be heard in state court next month."
Maybe Chadwix needs to look at more articles than just the FoxNews article. It brings in information Fox usually leaves out.
Thanks for bringing more information to the story.
You gotta admit, the people who go nuts over foxnews are fun to laugh at, have you ever seen someone get worked up over a url or television station?
Id demand access to kid then. Not going to let investment be mentally ruined by a pair of dykes.
Infracted - Post respectfully
Last edited by Dacien; 2013-01-01 at 12:47 AM.
just threw up a little bit after reading first 2 paragraphs. What the hell is going on guys?
I'm sure if you donate to a sperm bank, you get a waiver from child support.
And if you donated ... and didn't get that waiver ... I find it pretty hilarious.
Hopefully this amounts to nothing more than a scare that you should know what you're doing, there should be a law about have common-sense expectation (such as if donors to sperm bank, don't get child support, neither do these types of donors).