Page 19 of 22 FirstFirst ...
9
17
18
19
20
21
... LastLast
  1. #361
    Quote Originally Posted by Purlina View Post
    Well that depends, 75K for a family of 2-3 isn't that much. It's good, but not like that person is rich...

    ---------- Post added 2013-01-08 at 09:01 PM ----------




    You missed the average joe portion in there.
    Really because I've seen a family of 4 live just find on less than $40k a year.
    They just don't get new cars/phones/luxury vacations every year.

    And they sure as hell don't consider credit a viable option, using credit makes about as much sense as visiting a loan shark and is only done in medical emergencies.

  2. #362
    Quote Originally Posted by skrump View Post
    Really because I've seen a family of 4 live just find on less than $40k a year.
    They just don't get new cars/phones/luxury vacations every year.

    And they sure as hell don't consider credit a viable option, using credit makes about as much sense as visiting a loan shark and is only done in medical emergencies.

    You missed a big part of the discussion which was when said family losses their job because of a recession...


    Maybe they can save up 6 months worth of funds, but past that? Hard times ahead.

  3. #363
    Quote Originally Posted by Themius View Post
    I wouldn't keep saying the doctor is wrong, if people didn't keep trying to absolve him of his wrong doing lol.
    Where am I doing that? Please quote me on it, and if you can't, at least attempt to reply on topic ok?

  4. #364
    Quote Originally Posted by Tommo View Post
    Question: You dont want to pay for her kids, just like any person wouldnt. However it happened, we cant change that. So your response is to cut off the funding to her kids and let them go into care... which you still pay for. So in essence, you want to remove the children from their mother, just because you dont like her. Am I correct?
    No my response is to take her kids forcing them into foster care so the government can force the bitch to get a job and start repaying society.

  5. #365
    Mechagnome Neetz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    561
    If you can't afford to have kids then you shouldn't have them. If you want to spit out a football team, make sure you put your work in before hand, get a decent job, save, plan and then yeah thats fine.

  6. #366
    Quote Originally Posted by gutnbrg View Post
    so u want to punish her children and put them in homes that are like animal shelters, instead of giving her a few thousand a month to help raise them. I dont agree with the fact of her having so many children knowing that she wouldnt be able to care for them herself, but no reason to punish her children over it. Also putting them in care of the state would actually cost taxpayers more than giving her welfare...
    When we first found out she was pregnant I wanted to see her forced to abort the babies by the government or be completely denied financial aid simply because I and the majority of other sensible people on the planet knew dam well she wasn't physically/mentally/financially prepared to raise that many children, and the only ones to suffer would be the children themselves.

  7. #367
    Quote Originally Posted by Purlina View Post
    In this case that would be the kids wouldn't it?


    then those kids need to be placed with a family that is responsible enough to take care of them

    Her decision to purposely have more kids with out the means to support them is proof she isn't reponceable enough to keep them

  8. #368
    Quote Originally Posted by Garnier Fructis View Post
    Agreed, I'm sure growing up in a terrible environment where your source of food and income is your lone parent stripping for money is much worse than growing up in a foster home.
    I would think having your friends parents saying that your mother fucked up her life so bad that she was forced to suck dick on the internet because the $4000 welfare check every month wasn't enough to keep you and your siblings fed would be a rather fucked up situation for any child to endure.

  9. #369
    Quote Originally Posted by skrump View Post
    No my response is to take her kids forcing them into foster care so the government can force the bitch to get a job and start repaying society.



    I thought she already had a job stripping / doing porn?

  10. #370
    Quote Originally Posted by skrump View Post
    When we first found out she was pregnant I wanted to see her forced to abort the babies by the government or be completely denied financial aid simply because I and the majority of other sensible people on the planet knew dam well she wasn't physically/mentally/financially prepared to raise that many children, and the only ones to suffer would be the children themselves.
    As much as every side of the political spectrum would see you as completely insane, forced abortions for those without the means to provide for their children would very quickly fix the no-money parents problem.

  11. #371
    why is it when you go through the process of adopting kids you have to prove you are responsible enough financially, emotionally, have the proper environment, you go through a through background check before you are even considered to be eligible to adopt but we let any one purposely get pregnant that meets none of the standards you have to have to adopt

  12. #372
    Quote Originally Posted by Hiricine View Post
    As much as every side of the political spectrum would see you as completely insane, forced abortions for those without the means to provide for their children would very quickly fix the no-money parents problem.

    Which would completely violate our rights, and does not have a chance of passing as a law....

  13. #373
    Merely a Setback Rukentuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Mini Soda
    Posts
    26,116
    Quote Originally Posted by Purlina View Post
    Which would completly violate our rights....
    Yes, we should all just be allowed to breed uncontrollably and receive thousands a month in welfare assistance from the state.

    What about the rights of those paying for her idiocy?
    Quote Originally Posted by GreatOak View Post
    Hey, as a transabled, transethnic, non-binary, genderqueer, neo-communist, indoor-capable republican otherkin I am offended by your callous display of ignorance.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cybran View Post
    Both of those links don't provide any evidence. They make unsubstantiated statements

  14. #374
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    Yes, we should all just be allowed to breed uncontrollably and receive thousands a month in welfare assistance from the state.

    What about the rights of those paying for her idiocy?
    Is this a joke? The law would never pass.

    Republicans are against abortion, how can they at the same time support forced abortion? You won't see Democrats pushing for the law either...

  15. #375
    Merely a Setback Rukentuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Mini Soda
    Posts
    26,116
    Quote Originally Posted by Purlina View Post
    Is this a joke? The law would never pass.

    Republicans are against abortion, how can they at the same time support forced abortion? You won't see Democrats pushing for the law eaither...
    Here's an idea they would support, cutting off benefits of those that continue to breed while already on assistance.
    Quote Originally Posted by GreatOak View Post
    Hey, as a transabled, transethnic, non-binary, genderqueer, neo-communist, indoor-capable republican otherkin I am offended by your callous display of ignorance.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cybran View Post
    Both of those links don't provide any evidence. They make unsubstantiated statements

  16. #376
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    Here's an idea they would support, cutting off benefits of those that continue to breed while already on assistance.

    I guess that's all the republicans truly believe? Paying as little in tax as possible...

    I knew pro-life was a joke all along!

  17. #377
    Merely a Setback Rukentuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Mini Soda
    Posts
    26,116
    Quote Originally Posted by Purlina View Post
    I guess that's all the republicans truly believe? Paying as little in tax as possible...
    Then feel free to move to CA so you can subsidize her dumbassery. Have fun doing it.
    Quote Originally Posted by GreatOak View Post
    Hey, as a transabled, transethnic, non-binary, genderqueer, neo-communist, indoor-capable republican otherkin I am offended by your callous display of ignorance.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cybran View Post
    Both of those links don't provide any evidence. They make unsubstantiated statements

  18. #378
    Quote Originally Posted by Themius View Post
    Your opening line was enough for me to not give a shit about the rest of your post. Welfare a reward?!
    Yes it is essentially a system that pays the price for your mistakes aka rewarding your stupidity for ignoring the processes available to prevent childbirth and not having the common sense to have a plan in place when the situation arises.

    Man should use a condom
    Women should use birth control
    Women should consider the morning after pill
    If your not 100% sure you are prepared to care for a child without outside assistance "HAVE A GODDAM ABORTION"
    And if you don't believe in abortion I suggest combining the other methods of safe sex for safer sex.
    And if you don't believe in using contraceptives well then I sure as hell am not paying for your Deliberately poor choices and would sooner execute you.

    The tools are in place to prevent birth and the taxpayer should not be punished for your refusal to use them.

  19. #379
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    Then feel free to move to CA so you can subsidize her dumbassery. Have fun doing it.

    So then you admit that the pro-life platform was just a joke after all?
    Last edited by Purlina; 2013-01-09 at 04:21 PM.

  20. #380
    I feel a women or even a man should need to prove they are responsible enough financially emotionally and are capable to properly raise a kid before they are allowed to have kids

    Raising a kids takes more responsibility then lets say owning and driving a car or owning a gun but we have to prove we are financially responsible to get a a loan to buy a car we have to prove we are capable of properly driving a care before we are allowed to do so we have to go through a background check to own a gun

    But we allow anyone with no concern if they are capable to properly raise a kid to have one
    Last edited by Vyxn; 2013-01-09 at 04:23 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •