animals don't have souls so they can't be racist
animals don't have souls so they can't be racist
Then define "that different".
At which point does it no longer make sense ?
Yes it is fuzzy, because it's a completely human concept, Taxonomy as a whole is a human concept. What I said about species isn't even right in some particular cases, where we have to invoke sub-species or various kinds of exceptions, "races" aren't even considered as an "official" part of Taxonomy, they're a kind of grey area where there are significant differences, but maybe not enough to qualify as a sub-species.
If you want the truth, all of what composes this universe is a gigantic continuum, Life is part of it, there is no "abrupt" limit from one state to another, one living being to another.
Taxonomy is a tool for understanding evolution patterns, "races" are used for the same purpose. So according to the standard definition of a "race", it does not make less sense when used for humans than when used for some other living being.
Edit : clarification
Last edited by Eled.; 2013-01-08 at 06:51 PM.
Now, you see, I am but a simple Tauren..
I can not understand what you humans are getting all up in arms about with these 'races'...
I mean, I've seen white tauren... and black tauren... and brown and red and yellow(ish-tan) tauren. None of these tauren are any different than other tauren. Nothing makes them 'special' or 'less special'... Even those horrid grimtotem aren't any less than the rest of us, and if they are, it's because of their actions... yet, still, many have defected to our side during the attack on Thunder bluff.
Even taunka and Yaungol are treated with the same respect as ever other tauren... although the Yaungol are rather violent...
hmm.
Damn it, red it seriously the first time.
Still, they're a bit smarter than your average bacteria. As for pigs, they're damn smart. Only smart animals could be such lazy asses.
---------- Post added 2013-01-08 at 08:03 PM ----------
I don't know, standard definition of race to me is, as I've said, differentiating dog and horse breeds. So there's your line.
No. It's not racist. The horses are bred this way for desirable traits, not because the breeders hate the other horses. You see this kind of breeding for any kind of animal sport/show.
Racism exists because dumbshits like you keep bringing it up. Stop making an issue of it and it stops becoming one
Originally Posted by kasath
From Wikipedia -
Racism is usually defined as views, practices and actions reflecting the belief that humanity is divided into distinct biological groups called races and that members of a certain race share certain attributes which make that group as a whole less desirable, more desirable, inferior or superior.
Breeding for the reason of superior trait from a superior gene pool, by definition is racist?
Nope. Words take on different meanings depending on whether you apply them to humans or animals. We consider all humans equal, but we don't consider all animals within a species equal.
If you were to attempt to breed humans to get a "superior" genepool, that'd be eugenism.
Nothing and no one has rights except those given and enforced by the ruling power of said place.
---------- Post added 2013-01-08 at 07:55 PM ----------
Seems kind of racist that you assume that every black person speaks the same way.
---------- Post added 2013-01-08 at 08:02 PM ----------
It was epic
Maybe if horses became sentient and Clydesdales starting enslaving Appaloosas....
Oh! Also there was the christmas carol about three gingerbread-men that lived in gingerbreadland that apparently was racist cause it contains ''så bruna ,så bruna vi äro alla tre'' which basicly means that they are very brown. I don't get it either. Those who think this is racist are actually the ones that even notice this shit since i haven't even come close to the thought that it would represent three brown males. (it is even about friendship so if it were meant to be brown men, which it isn't, i don't get it)
here's a link to the song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj0V17U9RhQ
All I can do is roll my eyes at this.
You've been given ample proper reason as to why it isn't racism. The breeding for preferable traits in animals has no bearing on the very 'human' concept of racism.
You're baiting for responses. There are plenty of other avenues for you to explore to get the information you desire.
well, you see, racism only applies to human beings, and there's a pretty good historical reason for that:
throughout the whole of our documented history, not a single horse has ever complained about racism.
Warlorcs of Draenorc made me quit. You can't have my stuff.