Page 12 of 15 FirstFirst ...
2
10
11
12
13
14
... LastLast
  1. #221
    "Take the reins of one of Pandaria’s most majestic and rare beasts"
    At least until everyone and their grandmother purchases the damn things.

  2. #222
    Herald of the Titans Auxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    2,849
    I'm sorry, the mount is beautiful, but the cloud is gawdoful looking.

  3. #223
    Dreadlord Tarx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    787
    I realy like this mount. But I mind the 20 €.

  4. #224
    Looks like the bastard child of a cat and a donkey...

  5. #225

  6. #226
    Brewmaster Desareon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Between Time-Space & Space-Time
    Posts
    1,299
    MONEY GRAB! Not this time Blizz!

  7. #227
    Does blizz need to restock its coffers again?

  8. #228
    Quote Originally Posted by Geth View Post
    Does blizz need to restock its coffers again?
    Send a gold bullion their way.

    On a more on topic note though, I still cannot get over the amount of people who see this as an acceptable practice. This is a subscription MMO with a cash shop. A subscription game with a mount that costs more than a months worth of playtime.

    The usual expected "well then don't buy it!" or "it is their game, they need to make money somehow!" and variants of such aside, I think a million (billion?) dollar company is just being greedy to a fault when a cash shop is in play with a subscription MMO, especially when you consider how much money is invested each day, let alone each month, in overpriced character transfers/remodels/etc.

    Commence lulz worthy flaming.

  9. #229
    what's the appropriate amount of profit for a company to not be greedy? care to give us a number?

  10. #230
    And here I thought the Quillen mount was bad. Holy cow that's ugly.

  11. #231
    I perfectly understand why Blizzard does this even though wow is a sub game. They make a ton of money of it, nothing wrong with a company wantin to do that.. However, personally that price is a tad to high..

  12. #232
    Quote Originally Posted by Blur4stuff View Post
    what's the appropriate amount of profit for a company to not be greedy? care to give us a number?
    It doesnt have a specified number but feel and impression that company makes towards its customers. When we have some jaring problems in game itself varying from PvP to PvE and all we hear about them are excuses such as "limited resources (lol)" or "technical limitations", it gets rather irky when we see the very same company somehow finding enough resources to make a mount that doesnt bring anything to game itself.

  13. #233
    Keyboard Turner
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Somewhere between cloud 9 and the seventh level of hell
    Posts
    5
    man, i must be sick in the head or something...

    i actually kinda like the way it looks lol. Then again i like the Quillen that came with the collector's edition too...

    and i just got the 150 mount achievement...

    ok, maybe i just like mount collecting and MUST HAVE IT (lol :P)

  14. #234
    Quote Originally Posted by A Challenger! View Post
    Send a gold bullion their way.

    On a more on topic note though, I still cannot get over the amount of people who see this as an acceptable practice. This is a subscription MMO with a cash shop. A subscription game with a mount that costs more than a months worth of playtime.

    The usual expected "well then don't buy it!" or "it is their game, they need to make money somehow!" and variants of such aside, I think a million (billion?) dollar company is just being greedy to a fault when a cash shop is in play with a subscription MMO, especially when you consider how much money is invested each day, let alone each month, in overpriced character transfers/remodels/etc.

    Commence lulz worthy flaming.
    I think I post this most times a new mount comes out. Are you seriously complaining about a business making a profit from something that is incredibly successful? Do you complain when you pay too much for drinks on a night out, for cigarettes, for dinner at a restaurant?

  15. #235
    Blizzard will have to come out with a crazy cool looking mount for me to consider shelling out cash for a mount that doesn't have any other functions than the other 50 mounts I have and never use.

  16. #236
    typical activision blizzard, horrible cash grab

  17. #237
    WoW this is a first a mount that isn't cool looking up for sale on the store :0
    I wonder how successful it will be.

  18. #238
    Quote Originally Posted by kittenboots View Post
    good lord that thing is very unfortunate looking.
    i think it looks like
    an inbred goat

  19. #239
    Don't really get why you complain about them selling a mount in their store even when WoW is subscription based.
    Your subscription does not warrant free stuff. You get content and the right to log in for your 12 euros or w/e it is. This is just extra on top of it. But you gotta pay for it.
    It isn't game breaking if you don't buy it.

    There's no difference between a f2p mmo who sells something cosmetic vs. a pay to play mmo who sells something cosmetic.

    Ah well. Each new mount and pet added to the store spurrs the same replies as always.
    MMO-Champ should disable commenting on some of their news imho.

  20. #240
    Rudolph looks pissed

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •