Why do you insist on making provably false statements? LK model lacked the feeling of content progression of TBC because it was easy to see the whole instance in normal/10man modes before doing the actual "progress" (25hc). And that's just one example.
There's a strong reason to do 10s: Easier access to rewards. So people choose 10s, not because they prefer to raid with 9 instead of 24 other people, but because they prefer to get the rewards for the least amount of effort and skill required (which is perfectly rational).What the current system does not have is a strong reason for players to raid 25s and without that, players go for the format that they prefer. However, without something to draw players to 25s, the logistics issues for 25s become much more pronounced.
Then why is it OK for the current model to force people into 10s? Because that's what's happening, and it's a fact. I had a choice after 25 man raiding died on my realm: do 10s or quit. Many were forced into 10s, while myself I quit.It is consistent. I don't want players forced or obligated into either format but to be able to run the format they like.
It's a simple, factually accurate statement. Just because you refuse to accept facts doesn't make it "wrong". You should really learn that distinction. In 25 mans you cannot afford as many personal mistakes, because with 25 people making mistakes the boss will simply never die. In 25 mans you need higher personal skill because a raid leader can't keep an eye on you personally and call it out when you're about to screw up like they can in 10s.point is, this argument is popular with people who want to run down 10s. It is, however, wrong.
I am not. You're just blindly repeating your usual drivel without actually reading or understanding the positions of the people you're "replying" to.In which case you are yet another player who is willing to kill off 10s simply to allow you to raid 25s.