Well.. Arthas "Not as the lich king" is Arthas the Paladin... and he is nothing without frostmourne.
So Teron Gorefiend.
Saurfang would fall in the same category as "lich king arthas" because he was corrupted and granted powers.
Arthas (as Death Knight not Lich King)
Dranosh Saurfang the Deathbringer
I voted for Teron, he was the first DK , he was the most cunning of all, intelligent and a true tactician, he was never controlled like a puppet in the same way Arthas was and it's power was a mix of unholy dk and a warlock abilities.
What blizzard did with him in wow was absolutely stupid, i remember prior karazhan release how peoples speculated about teron being the last boss in it; intested they put him in BT i don't know why; i hope that somewhat they bring back him in a future xpack about the legion
How about we let the parenting of kids to... their parents? No, seriously, World of Warcraft is a videogame. Gaming it's supposed to be a fun activity (if you have that fun through challenges, social interactions, etc is completely up to you). Not some kind of "School of Hard Knocks about the Real World".
Using Deathwing as a mount is pretty freakin awesome, and a full blooded caster is always more powerful than a hybrid caster/melee or a pure melee. So I'd have to agree that without Frostmourne, Arthas wouldn't be powerful.
So if your arguing between Arthas the Death Knight and Teron Gorefiend, then Teron wins. Because Teron didn't need a clutch.
Last edited by Jaojin; 2013-02-10 at 06:45 PM.
"And what's the real lesson? Don't leave food in the fridge."
The wheel spins again.
Slaying 8bit dragons with 6 pixel long swords since 1987.