So because he hasn;t reached 2,2k he should keep his mouth shut about HIS opinion about PvP warrior burst? So because you aren't messi in football you are not allowed to have an opinion on football because of that.
---------- Post added 2013-02-20 at 11:58 PM ----------
mainly this...good post
And at this point in the rotation you'll still have typhoon, your 2nd damage reducing cd (ironbark), ToL will be ready to allow you to cast instant roots and/or flat out outheal his dmg with his cds up since his stuns are out, or you can just pop travelform and nature's grasp. At this point, unless your positioning is absolutely terrible you'll be out of line of sight behind a pillar, or if it's blade's edge, on the top level while he's stuck on the bottom. Now it's just a matter of waiting for who's cooldowns come up again first. Hint: It's not the warrior's.
Most high rated rbg groups are already dropping warriors for frost dks or locks. These changes/nerfs won't do anything to help this. Yes, in arena, when not cc'd or controlled, the burst is high. But so is just about every class right now. Most popular classes have a high burst potential, ie, locks, spriests, boomkins, rogues, hunters, and mages. DK's don't need much burst, they're dots alone are killing things. Next season, the percentage of non-FC warriors in high rbgs is going to be practically non-existent.
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines....
Seems like Blizzard listened to you.
Instead of nerfing our damage, they buffed everyone else's one.
This game is sooo fucked
Counter the warrior with a CC chain. If you don't have your own CC chain, maybe you should be looking for one instead of crying about a problem that isn't really their fault. You can't just be like "lol a warrior i bet he won't do shit" anymore. That gets you killed. Honestly. Who sits there and lets a madman with a sword attack you? Warriors true problem is they're almost impossible to kill compared to other classes in a reasonable amount of time. Hence, survivability nerfs in 5.2.