heres a list of languages with more than 200k speakers
I wonder what your point is. Is it that you have more people over there than we've got over here? Because if that's the case, may I again remind you of the fact that the Netherlands is about twice the size of New Jersey?
Size itself may not have much to do with it, which is more or less my argument, but proportion certainly does.
that's slang, and only 1 word at that. i don't think that really counts as a dialect or accent.
Plus, "bubbler" isn't even a state-wide slang term. The only place I've ever heard people use that are the middle to eastern part of Wisconsin. It doesn't seem as popular down in Milwaukee/Waukesha or up in the Rhinelander area. If you're not getting bubbler from there, I'd be very curious as to where else that's said.
In a country with rich history & culture, nothing is homogenous, you can drive 50 miles and feel like you're in a totally different country. Geographically, it depends, but I saw lots of "small" countries that are all but homogenous (anything but Belgium in western Europe).
I am from the Netherlands. If we have to drive for more then 1 hour, we think it is pretty far away already.
In 15 minutes I can reach 1 border. In 30 minutes another one. In 8 hours I could possibly visit 8 countries though I have to race through Germany a bit .
My country is tiny and it is still not culturally homogenous. You need to realise that untill 100 years ago most people didn't leave their home town much. If you lived in a town you would know the people in your town and the people in the towns around you but not much more. Traveling back then was really for richer people. City people also usually stayed in their cities, it was already more diverse then the country side.
Furthermore, mass media has only set in since the radio. And how much "culture" can you experience from the radio alone? People still stick to customs, language etc. that were there for centuries. And new people moving in might find it strange (the first generation) but their kids will grow up in the local culture as well.
Once drove through 4 different countries in one day - I imagine it's not an uncommon thing for European truck drivers to do.
To be honest, other than the signs changing language driving through Europe is not much different from driving in the states. There is very little if any border control in most places. There are sometimes check points on the freeways/motorways, but they seem to be largely unmanned and there 'just in case'. When I moved to Finland we drove from the UK and the only times our passports were checked were for the channel tunnel and the Stockholm-Turku ferry.
I live in Latvia, you can drive from 1 border to the other in maximum 5 hours. I couldn't stand living in a bigger country just for the long car drives.
I live in Holland, ill try to explain it to you:
Geographical
Scale down the USA.
Scale down states aswell, that way you have provinces
Each province has its own "accent" of dutch.
Some got their own habits, certain food specialties, etc.
Everything is green (http://www.refdag.nl/polopoly_fs/201.../474316160.jpg).
Unless you are in the city ofc. (https://maps.google.nl/maps?q=ensche...,68.04,,0,4.67)
No dead wastes, or sand like in texas.
No mountains.
Seashore with beaches.
Diverse canalsystem.
Holland is below sealevel, therefore the soil is very furtile and green. However, this also makes us vulnerable for floods and stuff like that, hence the reason we use brick houses instead of wood.
People and social system
Imagine cultural diversity (A moske, cinagogue and church within 2 square miles of eachother)
Less fat people.
Better social security.
Little people like the ones you have in Jersey Shore.
No Wallmart or Bestbuy (people)
Everyone has insurance.
Criminals are not locked away for the rest of their lives, but re-educated.
Better logistics
Better infrastructure
Brick houses instead of wood.
We care for our elderly, handicapped and unemployed citizens
Like Denmark and some scandinavian countries, holland has one of the most eleborate social systems in the world. We pay 33%-52% taxes based on income (32% over the first 30k you make, then 42% on anything beyond that untill 60k ish, then 52% for anything above that). Why would we pay that u might ask? Because of the social benefits you get here.
When you get unemployed, you get 70% of your last paycheck each month for the first 2 years. After that you get cut to a budget of around 1k a month.
When you need treatment in a hospital, dentist, mental treatment, whatever; the government pays your hospital bill
When you are unfit to work, because of a handicap, be it mental or psychical, you get a monthly pay from the government.
When you have a handicapped kid, you get benefits.
For every kid you have, you get a small benefit to help parents supply.
And there's alot more like that.
Now i know you are American and will probably go: OMG WTF, WHY WOULD U PAY FOR OTHER PEOPLE!?
Because they do the same for me, in case i get terribly ill or handicapped. Everyone does it, and therefor it works.
The people that earn the most pay the most, as it should be. We spread the costs this way. No-one but a few can caugh up 20k for a operation. In America you sell your house. Here, others pay for you untill one day, you eventually pay them back.
I'ts basicly Obama Care, without greedy republican interference if you will.
Weather
Sun from May till august.
Rain from september till december.
Snow from december till februari.
Rain from march till april.
Max temperature: 32 degrees
Min temperature: -15 degrees
Last edited by mmoc9478eb6901; 2013-02-25 at 02:22 PM.
What exactly do you want to know anyway?
Its not that different from a big country really, it just has less big cities and with that comes less social problems, also a more homogenized society is in general more harmonious and safer.
A bit less job opportunities depending on government policies and so forth... lived in both and prefer small countries.
But big countries have its benefits ofc
The major difference is that people are talking about native languages. And when they refer to any given language in particular, to the fact that there's a bigger disparity between the different topolects of any dialect continuum. If we were to include non-native languages into the equation, the variety is just as big in many countries as in the US (the 200,000 figure is just an arbitrary number).
In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.
Ok well native languages are not even listed on that list as they have less than 200,000 speakers for those languages.
---------- Post added 2013-02-25 at 06:07 PM ----------
Then you would also have to include french and german people speaking those languages have been here as long as the english.
False. 90% of the natives were already dead when the English arrived due to Spanish disease, and we were English up until 1776. Contrary to popular belief, many of the encounters with natives after that were small skirmishes/battles and not genocide. The genocide (most of it) happened when we weren't a country yet, since we needed resources and didn't yet have a fully functioning slave market. I also don't get how you come to the conclusion that the English weren't genocidal conquerors at the time.
Last edited by GreatOak; 2013-02-25 at 06:17 PM.
In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.