An Xbox 360 costs $200 tops. Buying that as a child's christmas or birthday present isn't completely unaffordable. And this isn't about wanting online or not - it's about using it or not. We can't say that anyone does or doesn't want it for any kind of fact. We can only state for a fact that there are a potential 30 million Xboxs *not* being used online at all.
And yet, despite that, there are a total of 54 million people not using the Gold service. 30 million that have never signed up and 24 million that have signed up for the free service. Out of 54 million people - not including multiple user accounts/systems, you're really suggesting not even 1 or 2 million might not want to play games online?
Anyway, this has gone way off topic now, so I'll read an follow up you make, but I'm leaving it there, there's nothing to be gained from further discussion on this. My point in the first place was that there's clearly a market for an offline Diablo 3 community, as shown by the above figures.
Car manufacturers get zero money from a person buying a used car - yet used car lots are on almost every street corner. This is a terrible move, guts a very significant portion of the gaming industry and really sticks it to the small business that trades in second hand gear.
Does this mean that you can't use Gamefly for the new xbox ?
Publishers don't dictate the hardware that goes into the consoles, nor do they dictate the OS the consoles use. So if Sony doesn't allow for a system like that, then a publisher can't force it.
Sony has been vague about whether they will prevent used games from playing or not, which is concerning. But it's absolutely up to Sony and Microsoft, not publishers.
Uhh well that's not exactly true. While I agree it's up to sony and microsoft ultimately the publishers and developers do indeed have influence over them. Theirs alot of interests to be weighed here. Like if it wasn't true then why is sony going back to a plain old x86 archicture? Why not stick with their cell crap?
Cause the Cell possessor well technically superior, is incredibly difficult to code for, and caused their lack of games at launch of the PS3, which as we all know was horrendous.
Not to mention publishers have zero say on how Sony or anyone else builds there hardware. It's a "If you don't like my rules GTFO" situation, and publishers would lose their license to publish on that console.
r.i.p. alleria. 1997-2017. blizzard ruined alleria forever. blizz assassinated alleria's character and appearance.
i will never forgive you for this blizzard.
well yea but that's expressly the point. Like if all the developers and publishers got on the same page tmmrw and said were only gonna support whichever of you adds in the most atrocious built in hardware DRM are you telling me neither sony nor MS would fall over themselves to get that exclusivity?