Classes
Folks, simulated DPS is not DPS. Please don't use it as evidence. We're not going to take it seriously. (
Source)
Okay if simulated DPS isn't true how do you then chose how to buff or nerf specs? Do you "wing it" and hope it works? BS talk!
Our DPS isn't simulated. But there will always be some guess work because we can't predict perfectly what players will do. (
Source)
Okay follow up question to that, how do you "find" classes or specs that aren't "where you want" if you don't rely on logs?
If statistics were easy the world wouldn't need statisticians. (
Source)
So that's confirmed then? you balance around how much a class/spec is represented instead of performance? Fishing for answers!
We look at representation for sure, but that can be driven by a lot of things: class kit, art, tradition. (
Source)
so do you look at class rep success rates/percentages. Popularity and success are not equal
Both popularity and efficacy are data points. There is a correlation but not often a strong one. (
Source)
Every class/spec is viable. Not every class/spec is top for their role. Community too hung up on "the best spec/class".
Agree. (
Source)
Hey homie, any chance for certain specs to get some love with the meta? Ele/Destro etc? Crazy some get near 8% and others ~1%.
We are still tweaking those gems. Agree that Ele doesn't benefit enough yet. (
Source)
Hunter (
Forums /
Skills /
Talent Calculator)
..shale spider for BM vs crane for MM. Damage buffs were great but bridging the gap between BM's and MM's utility could help
We buffed Chim Shot's healing (which I forgot to mention). It's not group utility per se, but is a thing BM / SV don't have. (
Source)
your argu to nerf silance shot was removing blanket silance , then u revert blanket again but silance shot is still 24 sec cd
Hunters don't need any PvP buffs IMO. Worried they are trending too good in 5.2. (
Source)
If movement does not challenge a hunter in pve now - what can? Tired of the hunter blowing away other ranged when we move.
Yet, they aren't winning meters overall are they? The game is better IMO when everyone has strengths and weaknesses. (
Source)
really!!!! Dismiss Pet now has a 3 sec cast time, up from 2. prof you use a dart board to decide what to buff/nerff /facepalm
It is dumb to dismiss pets in PvP in order to get a different CC DR. You'll barely notice in PvE. (
Source)
Mage (
Forums /
Skills /
Talent Calculator)
Just making sure, you ARE aware that Mages bring nothing but DPS, right? Making us middle = making us get sat. Please fix?
Under that argument who doesn't get sat? Tanks and healers? Is this a hybrid tax deal? (
Source)
All I'm saying is there's NO POINT to bring a Mage over a Warlock on the current PTR. Is that fair? I sure don't think so.
Raidbots (to use a site you can access) suggests 79K locks and 84K mages in 10H. Let's see if that ratio changes much in 5.2. (
Source)
GC, I respect you a ton, but please tell me you didn't just compare LIVE ARCANE to LIVE AFFLICTION...
We can't compare the 5.2 pops yet. I'm just citing a "before" so we can see what the "after" looks like in a couple of months. (
Source)
Mage gets deep buff(no glyph)+frost dmg buff, keeps 4s ImpCS. Minor nerf to pom ring, sheep anyone? CS>SS Mr Crab
You have to interrupt to keep the 4s CS, and the bomb detonation nerf is major. (
Source)
Granted on the bomb nerf, though many mages already use tempest instead. I was refering to the 4s silence, not cd redux :3
Fair enough. The duration is the same. The cooldown will often be longer. (
Source)
Is it the shield only or the damage portion of Incanter's Ward that can be dispelled, or both? Thanks.
Both IIRC. (
Source)
Monk (
Forums /
Skills /
Talent Calculator)
Why did you increase surging mist mana cost by 10%? The whole mistweaver community is clueless and angry, please explain
With numbers, we have to include how players perform and not just how they feel. (
Source)
Paladin (
Forums /
Skills /
Talent Calculator)
Ret is much less viable at high ratings? % of players in glad range is much lower than any other spec/class
It is really hard to isolate the effects of paladins who just go Holy because heals are always good and Holy is a little imba. (
Source)
The ratio of high rated Rets to total Rets is very low. This proves Rets are weak.
Or that Holy is so OP that any sane paladin goes Holy. Analysis is never that simple or we would have solved all this long ago. (
Source)
I PVP as a holy paladin and I agree. We've always been a defensive class. It was a mistake to give us so much CC.
But nobody used Holy before because they had no offensive pressure. They do now and they're popular. Just a bit OP. (
Source)
Healing is a completely different role in arena. One does not simply switch from Ret for the first time and be 2200+ at Holy.
Of course not. But how many players have heard "No room for Ret - we'll take you if you swap to heals?" Happens all the time. (
Source)
Priest (
Forums /
Skills /
Talent Calculator)
Do you really think shadow priests are in a good position PVE wise ?? They are rly weak in both actual fights and theory craft
I can't vouch for the theorycraft. Do you have any 5.2 logs? (
Source)
I'll post raid logs soon. But this is what we still look like single-target. http://t.co/rEXKEv9nyg
Stack ranks of simulation DPS are generally worthless. We have no way to know if each component is built with equal skill. (
Source)
Shaman (
Forums /
Skills /
Talent Calculator)
Thoughts on Ele/Enh gettings totems back while blanketed? The nerf was class wide when aimed at Resto only, pretty careless...
I've said before that we didn't like it for any shaman. Not okay for a weakish PvP spec to be annoying. That affects everyone. (
Source)
Seriously offended by this.We pour our blood sweat and tears into Enhance PvP and all we get is "weakish PvP spec is annoying"
I was making a philosophical point, not a shaman point. The argument was "we need this broken thing in order to be viable." (
Source)
it wasnt broken, it was unique. Remove blink too gc, mechanically its retarded to have short cd trinket.
Broken vs. unique is subjective, which is why we make the calls instead of leaving it up to the community. (
Source)
dont you think druid shapeshifting is also broken, if totems were? why double standards?
Mechanics working different isn't double standards. It's mechanics working differently. (
Source)
Warlock (
Forums /
Skills /
Talent Calculator)
A big problem with locks and pets is that for aff/destro pets don't scale with mastery, which is the best stat for both specs.
That's not really a problem except for talents that let you opt out of having a pet. (
Source)
do you think sacrifice was a mistake? i personally didnt want to play a warlock till i heard of that talent.
It's asking 2 questions at once: want DPS? Want a pet? (
Source)
If you want your pet but Sac is more DPS you feel like you have to lose your pet. (
Source)
ie: Sac DPS bonus should equal Pet DPS, so it's a choice of style rather than substance.
Or even a DPS loss since it's a convenience plus. (
Source)
So you're basically admitting that pets are inconvenient? Wouldn't the better design be one that makes them worth having?
Pets are something you have to manage, like embers or cps or mana. Is the game more fun if we remove every such inconvenience? (
Source)
lol. managing a pet is cool, but maybe DPS buffs (protectors) should affect them so many fights aren't "blizzard hates pets"
Pets are largely immune to raid damage. They have limitations on some fights, but aren't that big a deal to manage IMO. (
Source)
"Pet's are something you have to manage" - GC and "[pets] aren't that big a deal to manage IMO" - GC WTF?
What are you trying to lawyer here? Yes, you have to manage pets. No, it's not rocket surgery to do so. (
Source)
Warrior (
Forums /
Skills /
Talent Calculator)
instead of each patch making execute more and more like cata y not just nerf the meta for warriors? instead of gimping for pvp
We looked at the meta, but DPS was still too high. Execute will still be great in PvP. (
Source)
Why did Rampage ever got removed from fury warriors? In 10m it's often problematic, same for CM's where we lack buffs.
Feels to me like DPS warriors bring a ton of group utility these days. (
Source)
Fury generates more rage in Defensive Stance than Arms. So which one is broken?
Def Stance isn't supposed to be illegal. You should just prefer Battle to max DPS. (
Source)
I dont understand, Why do you keep making nerfs that effect prot warriors, we are the lowest DPS tanks by over 10k in parses
Which specifically? Execute? Won't that be like a 2% need for Prot? (
Source)
Exec, SS and Revenge. The change with SS/Rev are good for offtanking though, but we still dps less than other tank classes.
SS / Revenge should help with MT'ing too. Why do you think DPS is still low? (
Source)
just look at the logs, we are bottom of the dps. just critted for 3m on elegon and my dps still under the dk tank
They are a little low in 5.1 but that's why we buffed them. (
Source)