Last edited by Azshira; 2013-04-10 at 08:35 AM.
"You face not the Mod Hammer alone, but the infractions I command."
Sorry, it was a tentative of disarming the tension with humour, wasn't thinking it could be read at the opposite. My bad.
On topic A'lakir prenerf was not designed for 25man. At least it seems due to the placement required
The fact is none actually cared about Al'akir. Paragon beat everyone by miles on Neffy who was supposed to be the hardest boss among the three, and the race was still on Sinestra. Al'akir was the hardest boss of the tier in its original design, but everyone was focusing the attention elsewhere because nobody got time to spend on such a strange/difficult/insane/stupid (choose one) boss.
The longer progress lasts, the less time we spend a day raiding (or well, it stops going down once we`re at evening raids).
Ulduar and T11 both took long. And then you had ICC which had limited attempts limiting the time you can spend raiding.
gratz to envy!
off topic: Does envy still have some players from Ensidia?
Same goes for C'thun, that almost nobody put in this kind of list even if he remained undefeated a very long time.
It's hard to give a proper definition of difficulty in wow since the difficulty is always related to gear but you don't want "difficult" to mean "gear check".
Anyway, the fact that a boss takes more or less try and/or more or less time does not mean it will figure on these "unforgottable bosses" list.
I don't know what Lappe personally thinks of Ra'den, but just because a boss has a longer lifespan doesn't mean it's a welldesigned and enjoyable boss, afaik people that are on it find it buggy, boring and that gear will help out A LOT, Sejtas comment about the legendary backs for example.
Infracted; Don't post off-topic images (by Sonnillon).
Last edited by Sonnillon; 2013-04-10 at 12:23 PM.