1. #1
    Merely a Setback Reeve's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    28,800

    Samsung is 20% of South Korea's economy

    I was listening to an NPR story on Samsung this morning that mentioned that Samsung, of which their electronics segment is only one part, is responsible for 20% of the total GDP of South Korea.

    Products: Apparel, chemicals, consumer electronics, electronic components, medical equipment, precision instruments, semiconductors, ships, telecommunications equipment

    Services: Advertising, construction, entertainment, financial services, hospitality, information and communications technology services, medical services, retail

    So I looked it up, and in 2011, their revenues were $247 Billion USD, while South Korea's GDP was $1.151 Trillion USD, which is actually nearly 21.5%.

    My question is how common is it for one company to make up such a large portion of a country's economy? Doesn't that start to make the company a bit of a threat, with undue influence in the country's political and economic climate?
    'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
    Or a yawing hole in a battered head
    And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
    And there they lay I damn me eyes
    All lookouts clapped on Paradise
    All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

  2. #2
    Deleted
    Undoubtedly they have major political pull with that huge of a portion, which can't be good. Really surprised how big they are nationally.

  3. #3
    Deleted
    Usually it's not one company but a series of companies that have an alliance to stand stronger. It's pretty common, just think oil companies in Texas.

  4. #4
    The percentage is heavily miscalculated.

    Samsung does not solely operate in Korea. Most of its sales are made abroad, and it's highly probable that most of its costs are also abroad. Hence, what you want to be looking at is Samsung's activity in Korea, which is probably still very significant, but nowhere near 20%.

    It's frequent in Asia, and especially Korea and Japan, to have absolutely massive conglomerates. Governments encourage this, because even though it can take its tool on fair competition, it is also a great way to become powerful at exporting, which is exactly the case for Samsung.
    Last edited by Brachamul; 2013-04-01 at 01:35 PM.

  5. #5
    Deleted
    Nokia used to be a huge chunk of the Finnish economy as well. It still is significant, but not as big as it was 10 years ago.

    ---------- Post added 2013-04-01 at 03:32 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Brachamul View Post
    The percentage is heavily miscalculated.
    This is correct.

  6. #6
    The Unstoppable Force Bakis's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    24,644
    I'm far more worried about banks and hedge funds being large since I consider them the #1 threat to our way of life.
    But soon after Mr Xi secured a third term, Apple released a new version of the feature in China, limiting its scope. Now Chinese users of iPhones and other Apple devices are restricted to a 10-minute window when receiving files from people who are not listed as a contact. After 10 minutes, users can only receive files from contacts.
    Apple did not explain why the update was first introduced in China, but over the years, the tech giant has been criticised for appeasing Beijing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •