'Conspiring to use weapons of mass destruction' is weird to me though.
Can someone comment on:
- Any bombs in general being considered WMD in MA/Federal law?
- Intent to cause as much dmg as possible just not having the means for it being considered conspiracy to use WMD?
I think it is obvious from the bomb types and the damage they caused that they were pretty far off from acquiring ABC material.
Also wouldn't this mean that any mass killer that used any kind of (set) explosives should be charged with conspiracy to use WMD, since if those crazy people actually had WMD they would have used them to cause more damage?