However, I take a crumb of solace from the title. Just a crumb. Still eons better than the horde title~
I like both titles alot.
Btw quick question: Do you guys think the achievement will become a FoS, like in next expansion im pretty sure your not able to do this again, helping voljin taking out garrosh.
Alliance, the punching bag
Alliance 5.3 Questline is a joke.
The Alliance and its loss of Identity.
/quietly walks away
Seriously, there is barely any Horde whining, at least not on these forums, even this thread isn't much of a whine. Some people would prefer a different title for the Horde but aren't kicking up a fess about it.
Also, as someone who plays both sides of the fence, I like both "The Hordebreaker" and "Darkspear Revolutionary."
Though I will say, Alliance doesn't seem to be breaking the Horde at all. What's the blue 5.3 content, anyway? All I've seen is Horde stuff.
"Tell them only that the Lich King is dead, and that World of Warcraft died with him."
Oathbreaker as a title only works(ed) if you swore an oath to Garrosh. My Horde toons have sworn oaths to the Horde as a whole (pally) and the Darkspear Trolls (my shaman). Now if they have a quest where you specifically 'swear an oath to Garrosh' then yeah sure Oathbreaker works. Of course that would have be a quest everyone does.
In all seriousness, if the title is such a big deal, fine have the Alliance title. The only trade off is that we get the story line and content instead.
Last edited by Thetruth1400; 2013-04-18 at 09:05 PM.
It would much more prefered 'the revolutionary'. Or something to represent the true horde, which is what the horde rebellion is meant to be about.