I just don't get it, I just don't.
IMO there isn't a single good arguement for not implementing Tri-Spec, and some pretty goods ones for it.
The only thing not having Tri-spec costs us is time and gold. As far as I am aware, tedius re-specs and farming gold aren't fun. Blizz like us to have fun right?
We still have 3 specs, we can still use all 3 specs, not having Tri-Spec offers no uniqueness, the arguement is just ridiculous. I don't sit there and say "I am an ASSAS/SUB Rogue - what type are you?" I simply choose the 2 specs I use most often and then fork up gold and waste time re-specing when I want to use the third spec for something. I am going to guess that this is what ALL rogues (and all classes in fact do). You either put up with the pain when you want to make use of that third spec Blizz put (some) time and effort into making for us and presumably want us to play (else why have it??) or you simply don't bother and either don't engage in the activity you need that spec for or work around it (usually sub-optimally) with the other specs you have.
It is even worse for hybrids. There is nothing unique about spec-ing to heal, or spec-ing to DPS, or spec-ing to Tank. There is no choice there at all.
But the fact he picks rogues as the example, yeh, that really made me laugh too and then I stopped and sat there puzzled - it makes no sense!!
Using uniqueness as arguement when there are such limited options anyway ...... yeh, I am back to, I just don't get it!! In fact if you count talents and glyphs as part of the spec, Tri-Spec actually offers a LOT more uniqueness.
Though ofc, no matter how many specs we have.... yeh it ain't going to feel "unique"
When I saw the tri-spec noise I was hoping, oh well, at least there is always action bar saver!