Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
LastLast
  1. #21
    Dreadlord Kyuubi87's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    965
    3v3 and 5v5 is fun, but I don't see why Blizzard haven't abandoned 2v2 because of the imbalance that occur in it.

  2. #22
    cause they need to fire kalgan first. then they can delete arenas.


    oh yea, then undo every pve nerf since day 1.

  3. #23
    Stood in the Fire VelmuVeera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    476
    Because the only thing where PvP played seriously is still just arenas. People play rbg's because blizzard decided to give more cp and higher caps from rbg's if they wouldn't have done that they would be even more dead than arenas. Also, you balance the stuff which is competitive (arenas) not the stuff which isn't competitive (random bgs). Random bg's can be taken even less seriously than arenas also because they are just infested by bots and shit players, no need to "balance" that.

  4. #24
    Brewmaster Darksoldierr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    1,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyuubi87 View Post
    3v3 and 5v5 is fun, but I don't see why Blizzard haven't abandoned 2v2 because of the imbalance that occur in it.
    They dosen't support or reward it neither, so then why remove? 2v2 is still active bracket, and fun with your friend, even if unbalanced as hell.

    Also, the moment they balance based on RBGs, that is the moment Moonkin, DK grip, Frost Mage is nerfed to the ground. Which i dont se happening, at all.
    Time is on our side
    Brutal Gladiator Enhancement Shaman *rawr*

  5. #25
    Epic! TheGravemind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    CAIRO STATION UNSCDF-ODAI42
    Posts
    1,637
    Quote Originally Posted by Razorice View Post
    Because Arenas are one of the most fun things to do in the game. They're also challenging.
    Random BG's are mostly run by bots and people who, well, suck.
    this

    RBGs/Arena are the only things I do in the game.
    This one is machine and nerve, and has its mind concluded.

  6. #26
    Dreadlord Kyuubi87's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    965
    Quote Originally Posted by Darksoldierr View Post
    They dosen't support or reward it neither, so then why remove? 2v2 is still active bracket, and fun with your friend, even if unbalanced as hell.

    Also, the moment they balance based on RBGs, that is the moment Moonkin, DK grip, Frost Mage is nerfed to the ground. Which i dont se happening, at all.
    Well, they sort of do, you can get Conquest points really quick in 2v2 with very little time and less effort.

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Metallikiddd View Post
    cause they need to fire kalgan first. then they can delete arenas.


    oh yea, then undo every pve nerf since day 1.
    Sometime i wish i was a moron, life seems so simple for you guys.

    Infracted.
    Last edited by Nicola; 2013-05-02 at 08:35 PM.


    Pokemon Y FC : 1220 - 8005 - 9601
    IGN Name : Grey, Poison Safari : Cascoon, Garbodor, Muk

  8. #28
    Random BGs are the most fun for me as well. If they lowered the conquest point cap, I wonder how many people would even participate in arena or rbgs. Most I know just do them to cap points.

  9. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by Golden View Post
    Random BGs are the most fun for me as well. If they lowered the conquest point cap, I wonder how many people would even participate in arena or rbgs. Most I know just do them to cap points.
    Everyone I know plays tons of arena every week because it's the only place that takes any semblance of skill anymore. Just because you enjoy playing with mouth breathers doesn't mean blizzard should respect your opinion.

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by CHRONIClinex View Post
    because 3v3 is the only bracket that has any, ANY bearing of skill involved.
    Don't be biased to a point where you completely neglect everything else, nobody will take you seriously as it's ridiculous.

    ---------- Post added 2013-05-02 at 05:41 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Kyuubi87 View Post
    3v3 and 5v5 is fun, but I don't see why Blizzard haven't abandoned 2v2 because of the imbalance that occur in it.
    Why remove something that does not hurt anyone? I don't get your logic.

    ---------- Post added 2013-05-02 at 05:45 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Lumast View Post
    Whole lot of people in this thread that don't understand pvp at all. You have fun when you play with 9 random people that are awful?
    Occasionally, you're forced to perform better which will ultimately lead to that player improving. Obviously it will eventually get annoying... However in rated PvP that's definitely not the case, but in random BG's that's something you just sign up for when you queue. I mean I rather be in a normal team than in a pre-made becuase graveyard camping is probably the most boring thing in this game.

    ---------- Post added 2013-05-02 at 05:49 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Golden View Post
    Random BGs are the most fun for me as well. If they lowered the conquest point cap, I wonder how many people would even participate in arena or rbgs. Most I know just do them to cap points.
    I really don't think that's true. I think it's a stereotypical assumption based on the few high rated arena players constantly mentioning this on forums but especially on streams. Most people play it for T2 which is usually 2200 any other season and titles. It's something different but it can be really fun. Not specifically saying that you made such an assumption as you said that your opinion was based on most of the people you know, but I'm talking RBG's in general.

    ---------- Post added 2013-05-02 at 05:54 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by PizzaSHARK View Post
    So? Very few people give a rat's ass about "skill" - they just want to have fun. And currently, PvP isn't particularly fun, and the disconnect between what PvP is balanced around and how it's typically played is a major contributing factor to that.
    Quite honestly the state of PvP isn't as tremendously obnoxious as everyone makes it seem to be. Sure it's unblanaced, but every season has it's major flaws. I think the fact that the game is unbalanced is used as an excuse for most low rated players to not play and improve. I mean a good plyer is 2400+ in my opinion. I don't play 3's currently but I can't say that the game is unbalanced and use it as a legit excuse for me not being high rated. I can understand when gladiators complain, but the rest is usually just people being bad and not realizing it.

    ---------- Post added 2013-05-02 at 05:55 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Zergal View Post
    Sometime i wish i was a moron, life seems so simple for you guys.
    Don't fall for a troll and see yourself live long enough to become one as well.
    Last edited by Senathor; 2013-05-02 at 05:49 PM.

  11. #31
    Dreadlord Kyuubi87's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    965
    Quote Originally Posted by Senathor View Post
    Don't be biased to a point where you completely neglect everything else, nobody will take you seriously as it's ridiculous.

    ---------- Post added 2013-05-02 at 05:41 PM ----------



    Why remove something that does not hurt anyone? I don't get your logic.[COLOR="red"]
    Why keep something imbalanced?

  12. #32
    Arena's are one of the best parts of the game. Balancing the game around random bg's is a terrible idea. PVP should be balanced around 3v3 arena seeing as that is the only competitive Esport that wow has. You don't see RBG's at blizzcon do you?

  13. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyuubi87 View Post
    Why keep something imbalanced?
    So let's remove random BGs.

  14. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyuubi87 View Post
    Why keep something imbalanced?
    Why don't we remove the entire game in that case?

  15. #35
    Moderator Yvaelle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    3,792
    Balancing around 1v1 is obviously foolish, some classes which aren't as good in 1v1 situations are significantly better when combined with teammates - they gain peels or heals or dispels or the like. Warriors by themselves are susceptible to roots (historically, not as much currently) - but Warrior+Healer (particularly Paladins for Freedom) removes the disadvantage of Warriors in a solo environment. Shadowpriests and Affliction Locks historically are vulnerable to being sat on - they rely on a lot of channeling and casting, and thus suffer from knockbacks and kicks and stuns in a way others don't (while stunned, a Ret or DK or Warriors attacks come off cooldown, a Rogue or Feral regenerates energy - once the stun ends they get to spam their best attacks, not true for dot classes). So you can't balance immobile casters around 1v1, because when they have peels (and can freecast) they suddenly become a very different creature.

    Even balancing around 2v2 is ineffective, just as some classes aren't great in solo environments, some classes don't fully meet their potential until they have more than themselves and a single ally to play with. Holy Priests are terrible in 1v1, 2v2, and 3v3 - but in 5v5 and 10v10 they suddenly aren't so bad. The reason is that Circle of Healing and Divine Hymn hit 5 targets - if you are solo - this means that the core spell of your spec has only 20% effectiveness (1/5 targets available), in 2v2 it is only 40% effective, in 3v3 it is only 60% effective - and only even that if everyone is taking damage simultaneously. In 5v5 and 10v10, CoH and DH are 100% effective - there are 5+ targets, there is lots of damage going out - and the specs core spell actually does what it was designed to do.

    In 3v3 some classes seem much better than others, Shadow is great in 3v3 because it scales particularly well to that bracket - but in 5v5 and 10v10 Shadow representation declines quite rapidly. For example this is because in a 1v1 scenario, Vampiric Embrace heals the Spriest for 50% of all the damage they deal (100% if glyphed), in 2v2 it heals for 25% (50% if glyphed), in 3v3 it heals for 16.5% (33% glyphed), but in 5v5 it heals for just 10% (20% if glyphed), and in 10v10 it heals for only 5% (10% if glyphed). In the first three smaller brackets, that represents a significant heal and a useful survival cooldown - in the subsequent two larger brackets it's hardly noticeable. Not to say that these individual abilities solely decide what bracket each spec will be effective in, but they demonstrate how because abilities have different effectiveness in different brackets - abilities impact scalability.

    5v5 and 10v10 (RBGs) are just as dependent on team composition as the lower brackets. Take Shadow vs. Boomkins for a moment. In 2v2, Silence is a 5 second duration, 45 second cooldown single target silence spell - it silences 50% of the enemy team in 2v2. Solar Beam is an 8 second duration 60 second cooldown multi-target silence, that can potentially silence 100% of the enemy team: but often 2v2 has at least one enemy who doesn't care about silences (warriors, hunters, rogues, etc). In 10v10, Silence has the same duration and cooldown of course, but now it only silences 10% of the enemy team (1/10 targets). But, when a boomkin is combined with a DK's Gorefiend's Grasp - Solar Beam can pretty consistently silence 100% of the enemy team: ten times the effectiveness of Shadow's Silence. Boomkins aren't good in 2v2's, but they are mandatory for 10v10 - the more opponents available, the stronger boomkin abilities become - while Shadow is the opposite - strongest in smaller brackets, but weaker the more opponents that are present.

    I can't think of a way to balance all abilities across all classes so that some handful of abilities do not continue to be exceptional for a particular number of allies / opponents. We talked in the Enh Sham thread about this a bit as well - Enh survivability is strongest in 1v1, 2v2, and 3v3 scenarios - but in 3v3 where I generally dislike killing Enh shamans - in 5v5 or 10v10 they'd be near the top of my list for kill targets. That's because when you are fighting many opponents, a near-immunity cooldown is way better than a % damage reduction cooldown, while in smaller brackets the opposite is often true (because % reduction cooldowns always have far better uptime ratios than immunity cooldowns).

    TL;DR - You have to pick a balance point, 10v10 and 5v5 is no better than 3v3 or 2v2 or 1v1. Blizzard chose 3v3, and given it's halfway through the list - I think it's the right choice. If we balanced around 10v10, what went on in 1v1 scenarios would be wildly unbalanced - far worse than it is (and remember 1v1 doesn't just mean duels, most organic pvp is often 1v1 or 2v2 or the like). If anything, balancing around 1v1 would make more sense - and then nerfing any abilities that scaled too well in other brackets (not that I'm advocating that).
    Last edited by Yvaelle; 2013-05-02 at 11:14 PM.
    Youtube ~ Yvaelle ~ Twitter

  16. #36
    Stood in the Fire KBWarriors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Azeroth
    Posts
    471
    The number of Hardcore PvPers and PvErs in general is going down in the game. 25 raiding guilds are disappearing.. some converting to 10 man and others quitting the game completely. A lot of PvP guilds are starting to disappear as well. When I was playing on Illidan, it was tough to find a RBG group or a pure PvP guild that was still active.

    The problem is: Blizzard is taking out any sense of immersion or difficulty left in the game and people enjoy it that way. The game has become a World of Purples experience and that's all anyone cares about. I stopped playing recently but might return depending on how the expansion turns out.

    I'm not sure what Blizzard bases their numbers off of anymore. Part of me says they have meaningful data behind all the class changes and the other part of me says they're pulling random numbers out of their ass. The whole list of 5.3 PvP changes perplexes me...

    And if it's true that healers are hard to kill (which they are) then in 5.3 in Arenas, they'll be even worse. Just wait until they switch to their 496 PvE healing gear with 65% base resilience and their spell power goes WAY up from where it was due to PvP gear restraining it. I know I lost a ton of Spell Power on my characters when they got PvP geared but with 65% base resilience and the hard hitting nerf to PvP power, what the hell is the point of the PvP gear anymore?

  17. #37
    Dreadlord Kyuubi87's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    965
    Quote Originally Posted by Lumast View Post
    So let's remove random BGs.
    In 2v2 arena, the settings are completely different since it only allows 2 players. So your statement there is completely invalid. Not to mention the subject of this thread is 'arenas'.

    ---------- Post added 2013-05-03 at 01:19 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Senathor View Post
    Why don't we remove the entire game in that case?
    In what way is the entire game in every aspect imbalanced? Please enlighten me But you may want to stay on topic, since we are talking about arenas and drawing a line like your doing now and simply saying everything is imbalanced with no actual facts to back that up is pointless.
    Last edited by Kyuubi87; 2013-05-03 at 12:21 AM.

  18. #38
    Balance around 1v1 and the rest falls in to place. This balance has to be ALL classes against ALL classes. In a protracted fight of equal skilled opponents DPS should be able to wear down a healers mana and CD's. There is nothing more frustrating than bad RBG. Arena's are easy to setup, easy to comunicate and easy to keep doing. It's still really hard to get 2.2k rating where as RBG is much easier and derpy.

  19. #39
    Arena is a huge part of the game, especially 3v3 i personally think most people only do RBG is for the increased cap where as the main community of PVP only really enjoy 3v3 (2v2) occasionally random BG's are just for gearing and having fun and well ...random as in its title blizzard needs to concentrate on arena more and keep balancing are 3v3 people who dont like that , PVE'rs stick to what you know best ! keyboard turning and such .

  20. #40
    Mechagnome Manabomb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Probably laying somewhere frozen and cold.
    Posts
    723
    Quote Originally Posted by PizzaSHARK View Post
    So?



    No, it doesn't. I mean, sure, it has tournaments, but the community isn't huge - especially not compared to the many, many more people who don't give a crap about "competitive PvP" (fucking lol) and just queue for a few BGs between raids or to have a little fun. There's no point in balancing the game around a comparative handful of (extremely vocal) players when the majority of the playerbase plays a gamemode that's at best tangentially related to it.



    ... Because PvP is designed and balanced around arenas. Which is the point of the thread.
    By your logic, pvp should be removed from the game because the majority don't care or dislike pvp and would see it removed because it effects pve and other aspects in the game in both negative and positive ways that effect how the -majority- of the players play.

    This game should not be balanced around the idiots, bots and noobs that run rampant in the random bgs simply because they are the majority. This is not how pvp currently works, has ever worked or should ever work. Pvp should be balanced around the bleeding edge of competition and the ability to work together to overcome the enemy team in whatever objective. This game additionally should not be balanced around the ridiculousness of aoe spam fests that are rated battle grounds. To be fair, in my own opinion, I don't think rated battlegrounds should have been implemented in the first place due to the very obvious and prominent difference in requirement for balancing that arena's and rated battle grounds have. There needs to be a focus on bleeding edge "endgame" pvp competition and the pvp game needs to be balanced around that. Otherwise there will never be any sort of balance between rated battlegrounds and arenas.
    Last edited by Manabomb; 2013-05-03 at 12:49 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •