OK, I found revenue numbers for the top 10 Merck and Pfizer drugs. No HIV medication even hits the top 10, and the lowest on the list is $277 million. So the MOST HIV medications make for pharmaceutical companies is $269.9 million/year, and probably a lot less.
Merck's top cancer drug was worth $292 million, Pfizer's was $293 million. Pfizer's highest seller was Lipitor, at more than $3 billion. Now imagine if all those people with cancer or HIV lived longer and used more Lipitor.
http://www.businessandfinance.ie/index.jsp?n=599&a=2778
Last edited by Reeve; 2013-05-08 at 09:31 PM.
'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
Or a yawing hole in a battered head
And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
And there they lay I damn me eyes
All lookouts clapped on Paradise
All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!
I've never seen anyone that has even the dimmest grasp of the research world suggest this sort of shit. That should be a sign for people that entertain it.
For certain kinds. There are hundreds of types of cancer, you know.
Rincewind: Ah! We may, in fact, have reached the root of the problem. However it's a silly problem and so I am suddenly going to stop talking to you.
The better character questionnaire (D&D)
You cannot wipe out cancer; it is a normal biological process that, unlike AIDS, can never be fully eradicated. You develop cancerous cells hundreds of times a day; the problem is when the body can't wipe them out. As for the cure, the pharmaceutical business is absolutely not a monopoly. You have dozens if not more companies and universities invested in drug development. Any one of them discovering a way to all out eradicate cancer would be the first to truly dominate the entire market and draw in not only vast and continuous revenue, but international recognition and prestige and likely billions in grants to work on other projects.
---------- Post added 2013-05-08 at 10:42 PM ----------
Well, in all fairness the greater part of the general populace doesn't even understand what cancer is.
That's why I encourage them to actually listent to scientists instead of concocting or listening to kooky conspiracies. If someone told me there was a secret material that could build buildings stronger and cheaper, my inclination would be to ask a materials scientist, not say "awesome!". I don't know shit about chemistry and materials engineering and such, so I trust the people that do. I'd like everyone to do the same with biological treatments.
'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
Or a yawing hole in a battered head
And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
And there they lay I damn me eyes
All lookouts clapped on Paradise
All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!
People who have no clue how the pharmaceutical industry works really shouldn't be commenting on threads like these because it ends up looking mindbogglingly stupid to those that do.
If a company found the cure for any of those things they would patent it, sell the crap out of it, bundle it with all sorts of other products of theirs, make a huge profit, gain tons of market share, and laugh all the way to the bank.
What they wouldn't do it hide it away from the rest of the world.
Plus, do you really think not a single person would speak up? It isn't like a single person in some cave works on these things. There are teams of dozens if not hundreds of people who would know about it at any given time.
actually cheech is the latest person to be fully cured of cancer
there are many people being cured on the plant of renown page on facebook
its a matter of diet and cannabis
there are over 10 people totally cured on that page alone
CBD regulates the chemicals that trigger cells to eat dead cells thus curing cancer
its a well known fact if you know your stuff
It is a well known fact that Obama and Biden have been in bed with the Illuminati and are mass producing the cure for aids and cancer just in case they get it. They were going to give it to the public for free, but Dick Cheney found a way to keep them quiet.
No, they don't have the cure for cancer, do you realize how much money the person who found the cure would make if they started selling that? Why would they keep it a secret.
@CrazyRaver: I really hope you aren't serious -_-
just google CBD oil cure cancer
there are lots of studies on it atm
But diseases seldom go extinct. It's happened to what, four diseases in the history of modern medicine? Just because a cure exists doesn't mean the disease will vanish. The first company to come up with and release a cure will immediately steal profits from the other companies that make the current treatments (chemo mixtures, etc.) Holding onto a cure is a risky gamble, if you make the current treatments as well then another company releasing the cure will take your current profits. If you don't make the current treatments, then you are giving up a profit gold mine by not releasing the cure.
Plus, there is the stock price to consider. Just the PR from a cancer cure will result in billions of dollars flowing into any publicly traded company.
Conversely, if they had a cure and hid it, one person leaking that info to the press and the company is dead in the water. We have so many whistle blowers nothing that big can be kept out of the media forever.
In short:
Have a cure and release it:
Huge PR boost
Huge stock boost
Huge potential for profits in a competitor-less field.
Have a cure and hide it:
Potential profit from existing treatments (of which you are competing against dozens of other pharm companies)
Risk of those profits disappearing if another company releases a cure
Bad PR that will kill your company if you are discovered
Potential for being held legally responsible for all cancer/aids deaths since you created the cure (a bit of a stretch, but if people sue over coffee being hot you can damn well bet they will sue if you purposefully withheld a treatment that could save a life)
So basically, no real reason not to release the cure if one existed. Too much risk
Author of Instance Profit Tracker
Find out how much gold you earn soloing raids and dungeons
Curse | GitHub
WowInterface
Aids is the side effect from HIV. Aids is what happens when your immune system is destroyed by HIV.
Finding a cure would mean finding a way to rebuild your immune system.
Cancer is when your cells mutate and begin acting in way they were not meant to.
You cannot simply find a cure for such an effect. Simply due to the fact that we have millions and millions of cells. furthermore not all cells are equal nor are all mutations equal.
Sorry to say this but there is no pill, that can work and fix every single type of cell.
there is no ''reset to fabric settings'' button.
Also even if a cure for cancer was found, it would only be for a specific mutation.
Then there is the discussion about mutations and natural selection.
Last edited by mmoc11dc8b724d; 2013-05-08 at 10:07 PM.
im amazed at how deluded most people are over what the government controls you with
Yeah, I came in to this thread with these exact two points in mind. Cancer isn't a single thing, and the dangerous part of AIDS is that a regular cold can take you out due to no immune system.
However, there has been some amazing progress in the treatment and research of autoimmune diseases the last decade, so I genuinely believe we'll cure AIDS (and MS, Crohn's etc.) in the foreseeable future. But I don't believe that there is already a cure that is being kept secret for whatever lackwit reason.
Large pharmaceutical companies have little interest in 'curing' cancer or aids.....the money is in treatment, not curing.
Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelled of elderberries.