Page 40 of 41 FirstFirst ...
30
38
39
40
41
LastLast
  1. #781
    Field Marshal
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Bogpaddle
    Posts
    95
    Warrior = Dragonslayer ( Only thing I could think of) (DPS/TANK mix?)
    Mage= Blood Mage (This could actualy be a Healer. Imagine harvesting the life out of your enemies then sending it to allies)
    Rogue = Dunno, but it looks like leaves plus something in the distance. Like an explorer type spec. Maybe it is Scout? (DPS)
    Hunter = Spellbow. Arrows that are Magic etc. Uses mana instead of focus and has no pets etc. ( DPS ) ( I think only BM should get Pets but their normal bow dps should be LOWERED a lot, Maybe have Marksmanship about ya know Heavy Arrow Damage and have the Other spec as DoTers.)
    Shaman = Earth Warrior ( or somethin glike that) Harness the power of the Earth to toughen your body and armour. ( TANK )
    Priest= Void / Chaos. Similar to Shadow but more "echo-y" The abilities build up Chaos which is then used to empower your spells. ( DPS )
    Warlock= Demon Hunter or Fel Knight. Use Metamorphosis and similar abilities to be a tank. Take the form of different demons etc. ( Tank )
    Paladin = Judgement or Justice,( DPS )
    Death Knight = Necrotic / Necromancer. A forbidden practice that lets you heal your friends. OR uses the powers of Death to create spells ( Heal or DPS ) ( I would swap UNHOLY into a Healer spec and turn the 4th spec into something to do MORE with plauges and DoTs)
    Monk = Cant tell for the monk. I still think they should have some type of Drunken Fist thing for Brewmaster where instead of energy / mana you have Ale.

    Tinker = I will try to do all 4 of the tinker specs but because not a lot is known about the tinkers ( Not enough for fans to make4 specs for em) i will not be using any lore sources etc.

    Spec 1 = Chemical Tinker. Tinker with the properties of chemicals then use this to both kill enemies and kill frien- oh wait i mean HEAL friends! Uses mana to change Chemical properties. (Heal/DPS hybrid)

    Spec 2 = Electro Tinker. With a ZAP ZAP there and a ZAP there and in your zappy face! Use your Electro Weapons to ZAAAAAAAAAAP people. ( Ranged DPS)

    Spec 3 = Genetics Tinker. When I showed those tree huggers in Moonglade my latest inventions, they tried to kill me ! It's not my fault if I can force my body to change into a giant ball of muscles! There just jealous that all they can turn into are ANIMALS! (TANK)

    Spec 4= The Tinkering Tinker. All these blasted youngsters and their Zappers, Chemicals and Gianti- Genti- Geneticals ! WHO CARES WHAT YOU CALL EM!? Old School is the true way to go with two steam gunners in my hands, a few nades in the back pocket and my Sentry Making for Dumbies book I'll DESTORY the battlefield! *Evil laugh interrupted by wheezy coughs*

  2. #782
    Quote Originally Posted by UcanDoSht View Post
    No, they never obviously *lie* to their customers. Its a, now, confirmed fake and you can forget about it.
    I mean the screenshot itself is fake (the icons and new class) but they could still be working on 4th specs NOT represented by that screenshot.

  3. #783
    Quote Originally Posted by UcanDoSht View Post
    No, they never obviously *lie* to their customers. Its a, now, confirmed fake and you can forget about it.
    Cause blizzards never lied to us before right? Or taken something back? Oh man I could lose count how many times they've done this.

  4. #784
    You guys know ghostcrawler just comfirmed this to be fake right? The thread can end now.

    Quote Originally Posted by Simulatio View Post
    A handful of people nut-busting about it on various forums does not equal popularity, and popularity does not equal good design.

  5. #785
    lolz some of you guys just dont remember when they APRIL FOOLED us with pandas and SAID THAT WOULD NEVER BE IN GAME.. see where that went

  6. #786
    Quote Originally Posted by Angarin View Post
    Cause blizzards never lied to us before right? Or taken something back? Oh man I could lose count how many times they've done this.
    If Ghostcrawler was lying about this, I would lose all respect for him. Look bro, he said it on his personal twitter. If the fraudster who made the SS had nailed everything on the screenshot, GC wouldn't have said a goddamned thing about it, ever.

    Blizzard has NEVER lied to us. This would not be a "take back" ("take backs" presumably include player housing and things that we were told that were later cancelled). Either the graphic is fake, or it isn't. Ghostcrawler took time out of his day to tell you IT IS FUCKING FAKE. He has zero motivation to lie (for that matter, Blizzard has zero motivation to lie).


    The thing is a fake. Period.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by mileskg21 View Post
    lolz some of you guys just dont remember when they APRIL FOOLED us with pandas and SAID THAT WOULD NEVER BE IN GAME.. see where that went
    They never said Pandas wouldn't be in game. The april fools was so popular they put it into WCIII. Up until that point, there was no plan for a Brewmaster, but once the community was thrilled about it, boom, they started working on it. Get your shit straight!

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Sukhoi View Post
    You guys know ghostcrawler just comfirmed this to be fake right? The thread can end now.
    IMO the OP should fucking fix his post (or maybe a mod should) so that is the first thing anyone sees. He should link to:


    https://twitter.com/Ghostcrawler/sta...51530633428993


    "The screenshot with four class specs and a tinker class is fake. We can't confirm/deny every rumor but this one is just a clever fake."
    Last edited by Verain; 2013-08-12 at 01:36 AM.

  7. #787
    High Overlord Mshadowz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Frozen North
    Posts
    134
    He's lying! I can see it in his eyes!

  8. #788
    High Overlord gguga12's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    169
    Guys Gc confirmed is fake lets stop this tread and be happy

  9. #789
    Bloodsail Admiral Desareon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Paradise Lost
    Posts
    1,167
    Blood Mage?!?!?!?! OH PLEASE GODS, PLEASE!!!!! But with no other evidence, I'm not holding my breath.

  10. #790
    Quote Originally Posted by Desareon View Post
    Blood Mage?!?!?!?! OH PLEASE GODS, PLEASE!!!!! But with no other evidence, I'm not holding my breath.
    See, this guy sees the top post, but doesn't see the tweet where GC has explicitly disavowed this screen shot. Because the GC tweet needs to be IN the top post, to stop people from being confused.

  11. #791
    Quote Originally Posted by UcanDoSht View Post
    No, they never obviously *lie* to their customers. Its a, now, confirmed fake and you can forget about it.
    Just because something is fake doesn't mean they aren't possibly working on something similar. Technically they wouldn't be lying even if that were the case. I'm not saying they are, but you are excluding possible outcomes that shouldn't be excluded yet.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Verain View Post
    Blizzard has NEVER lied to us.
    Ehm, I find that hard to believe.

  12. #792
    Quote Originally Posted by Hardstyler01 View Post
    Ehm, I find that hard to believe.
    Pay attention then.

    Now, lets clarify. A broken promise isn't a lie. A lie is when they know the truth and say something false. So, for instance, when they told us they were going to have player housing, they meant it... at the time. Later, they backed out, and didn't bother to tell anyone when that was happening. This is very standard among MMOs. But when, for instance, Lich King leaked, they didn't stand up and say "Nope, not Lich King". They never lied.

    And this isn't a lie either.



    Just because something is fake doesn't mean they aren't possibly working on something similar.
    If either tinker or 4th spec was being worked on right now, GC would NEVER have made any comment. He's not trying to fuck with us, ok? Blizzcon won't have an Engineer and a smirking GC saying "But technically, it was fake, because we didn't do the fourth spec! And we called our tinker an engineer!"


    It means that the next expac will not have a tinker.

    It means that the next expac will not have 4th spec.

    But much more importantly- it means that we have GC's word that this obvious fake is an obvious fake. If your response to that is "oh, ok, GC probably hopped onto twitter on Sunday to fucking lie to us", or "well, ok, the fake is fake, but everything in it might be true"...

    Well, whatever. Can't help ya!

  13. #793
    Quote Originally Posted by Hardstyler01 View Post
    Just because something is fake doesn't mean they aren't possibly working on something similar. Technically they wouldn't be lying even if that were the case. I'm not saying they are, but you are excluding possible outcomes that shouldn't be excluded yet.
    Exactly. If Blizzard is only working on 4th specs, they have to disavow this image now to avoid the predictable and constant "well what happened to the tinker?" questions after. Or vice versa.

  14. #794
    Quote Originally Posted by Verain View Post
    Pay attention then.

    Now, lets clarify. A broken promise isn't a lie. A lie is when they know the truth and say something false. So, for instance, when they told us they were going to have player housing, they meant it... at the time. Later, they backed out, and didn't bother to tell anyone when that was happening. This is very standard among MMOs. But when, for instance, Lich King leaked, they didn't stand up and say "Nope, not Lich King". They never lied.

    And this isn't a lie either.





    If either tinker or 4th spec was being worked on right now, GC would NEVER have made any comment. He's not trying to fuck with us, ok? Blizzcon won't have an Engineer and a smirking GC saying "But technically, it was fake, because we didn't do the fourth spec! And we called our tinker an engineer!"


    It means that the next expac will not have a tinker.

    It means that the next expac will not have 4th spec.
    When the Goblin and Worgen masks were leaked pre-Cata announcement, Blizzard tried to cover it up by saying people were just jumping to conclusions and it wasn't anything, and then they tried to add in several other NPC race masks to try and make it seem like the worgen/goblin ones weren't for new player races.
    The Abbot at first tried to console Pai Mei, only to find Pai Mei was... inconsolable.

  15. #795
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitei View Post
    When the Goblin and Worgen masks were leaked pre-Cata announcement, Blizzard tried to cover it up by saying people were just jumping to conclusions and it wasn't anything, and then they tried to add in several other NPC race masks to try and make it seem like the worgen/goblin ones weren't for new player races.
    That is a pretty great example. I remember those days.

  16. #796
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitei View Post
    When the Goblin and Worgen masks were leaked pre-Cata announcement, Blizzard tried to cover it up by saying people were just jumping to conclusions and it wasn't anything, and then they tried to add in several other NPC race masks to try and make it seem like the worgen/goblin ones weren't for new player races.
    Didn't that all happen like, a year or more before cata was even announced? I seem to recall ogre and naga masks cropping up at about the same time, even vrykul.

  17. #797
    each class should have 6 specs, none of that new talent system shit, mages would learn 6 elements, warlocks would harness all of the dark magic universe, priests would study different disciplines, etc. The catch would be that every race would have its own 3 specs out of the 6, and the specs it would have would match their race. This would add much more depth to both the races and the classes.

  18. #798
    Quote Originally Posted by angryplateguy View Post
    Didn't that all happen like, a year or more before cata was even announced? I seem to recall ogre and naga masks cropping up at about the same time, even vrykul.
    It was quite a ways before Cata was announced at Blizzcon, yes.

    The Ogre, Naga and Vrykul were part of the fake masks that blizzard put into the PTR build afterwards to try and make it seem like the Goblin and Worgen masks weren't for players.
    The Abbot at first tried to console Pai Mei, only to find Pai Mei was... inconsolable.

  19. #799
    Quote Originally Posted by Barrano247 View Post
    each class should have 6 specs, none of that new talent system shit, mages would learn 6 elements, warlocks would harness all of the dark magic universe, priests would study different disciplines, etc. The catch would be that every race would have its own 3 specs out of the 6, and the specs it would have would match their race. This would add much more depth to both the races and the classes.
    And then everyone would only play the most optimal of all them combined. No sir, that would never work.

    It would be cool, but it couldn't be anything other than flavor spells if it was going to work. Like warhammer online, archmage vs goblin shaman, or black orc and sword master. They tried that, but one side always ended up with the better end of the stick. Most notorious was brightwizard vs Sorceror, BWs were pretty much the best class in that game.

    So again, it wouldn't work.

  20. #800
    Quote Originally Posted by Tirr View Post
    Some guy on the US forums (Not me) apparently got emailed by "accident" a leaked image referring to class set up for next expansion. Pretty sure its BS but even if totally fake it still is interesting and if were true it would be awesome IMO.



    This is the thread that I saw it on, on US forums http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/to...6660776?page=1 Topic has now been deleted from us.battle.net

    Anyway I thought I'd bring this to mmo champion even if it is fake pretty cool ideas for 4th specs.

    ...this crap again

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •