Aff buffs in 5.3...

[Natixsphere]

Just curious it seems like everyone who is getting buffs in 5.3 are getting 15% buffs... Is there a reason aff is getting hated on and only getting 10%? Its dmg isnt even good in arena atm to make anyone worry so you would think it would be getting the 15% buff... >.<

[Annoroth]

A full row of AffDots, with the set bonus, is still weaker than it was in 5.1, before the 25% corruption nerf. It's less than a wash.

[Chestbrah]

It would be lovely to see a new emergence of afflock/rdruid like in BC. That made for some of the most enjoyable 30 minute games I've ever played.

[Deleted]

According to rumours the pvp developers have said its impossible to buff affliction in pvp without messing up affliction in pve
so affliction players will more or less have to change spec for pvp or just go with pve.

Lovely

[ProteinShake]

Lol, whatever afflic is fine. Play the right comp and profit. Adjust your gameplay

[Deleted]

Lol, whatever afflic is fine. Play the right comp and profit. Adjust your gameplay

This is afflictions current state in pvp;


Affliction Warlock representation in 2v2: Amount of players above 2200 = 0%

Affliction Warlock representation in 3v3: Amount of players above 2200 = 0.5%

Last Database Update : 16 May 2013

You clearly know what you are talking about, mate

[Lulbalance]

Lol, whatever afflic is fine. Play the right comp and profit. Adjust your gameplay

'the right comps' are comps with partners who have over te top insane burst.. if you havent noticed - those classes are under siege from dev's. theres maybe 2 left.


just saying... jig is up probably in 5.3. unless your partners are S class in skill and spec..gonna be rough for aff.

[ProteinShake]

Yeah. You dont know what you are talking about. Move along!

That 1500 bracket must be hard huh


DK/Ua/Monk, UA/WW/Resto

[Glurp]

This is afflictions current state in pvp;


Affliction Warlock representation in 2v2: Amount of players above 2200 = 0%

Affliction Warlock representation in 3v3: Amount of players above 2200 = 0.5%

Last Database Update : 16 May 2013

You clearly know what you are talking about, mate

How many comps you can play means nothing. Just play the right comp and you can achieve whatever.

[Deleted]

How many comps you can play means nothing. Just play the right comp and you can achieve whatever.

Thats not relevant to what im discussing at all. Try again

---------- Post added 2013-05-20 at 07:21 PM ----------

That 1500 bracket must be hard huh

Ignorance is bliss

[Lulbalance]

That 1500 bracket must be hard huh


DK/Ua/Monk, UA/WW/Resto

so you've listed a t3 and t4-5 comp..and called salty a 1500 player. lol.

some good stuff.

[ProteinShake]

How many comps you can play means nothing. Just play the right comp and you can achieve whatever.

I have a feeling most of the wow community rather just QQ, and post on forums all day than actually play the GAME. If you love your class you play it... You look to become better in the current state, not look for insta gratification. I'd rather bust my ass achieving 2200 on a lock than facerolling some FOTM class after a month or 2 of practice.

I'm talking about 5.3. Monk buffs, dks unchanged, melee buffs yes but hey thats why you have a monk.

[Lulbalance]

I have a feeling most of the wow community rather just QQ, and post on forums all day than actually play the GAME. If you love your class you play it... You look to become better in the current state, not look for insta gratification. I'd rather bust my ass achieving 2200 on a lock than facerolling some FOTM class after a month or 2 of practice.

I'm talking about 5.3. Monk buffs, dks unchanged, melee buffs yes but hey thats why you have a monk.

the problem is we want to play what we enjoy and be competitive well over 2200. different people have different gauges for fun in wow.. after 9 years i don't find it fun to que into a line of 2k thug cleaves a mile long and feel like avoiding comp farm is impossible..

[ProteinShake]

the problem is we want to play what we enjoy and be competitive well over 2200. different people have different gauges for fun in wow.. after 9 years i don't find it fun to que into a line of 2k thug cleaves a mile long and feel like avoiding comp farm is impossible..

Thug is pretty much gutted.. I understand that we all want to play at r1, but realistically you think everyone that posts and qqs here that their class is dog is even capable of being in that bracket?

[Thelxi]

I blame malefic grasp. I want shadow embrace back.

[Lulbalance]

Thug is pretty much gutted.. I understand that we all want to play at r1, but realistically you think everyone that posts and qqs here that their class is dog is even capable of being in that bracket?

1 - i was talking about this season.

2 - if that's their goal, yes i do.

[loki504]

According to rumours the pvp developers have said its impossible to buff affliction in pvp without messing up affliction in pve
so affliction players will more or less have to change spec for pvp or just go with pve.

Lovely

and this is why pvp power could make the balance diffrent. but said blizzard doesn't want to see. why not make pvp power give exttra dmg above the normal? or even give a afflicion only skill give a few extra%pvp power. doesn't effect pve in any1 buy will make affliction pvp better

[Glurp]

Thats not relevant to what im discussing at all. Try again

So what you're discussing is irrelevant. NO CLASS should just be the king of PvP and be able to substituted in anywhere and get rank 1. You have to play specific comps if you want to achieve high rating.

[Deleted]

So what you're discussing is irrelevant. NO CLASS should just be the king of PvP and be able to substituted in anywhere and get rank 1. You have to play specific comps if you want to achieve high rating.

Again.. totally off topic about what the discussion was about. Do you even read posts before you answer?

[Glurp]

Again.. totally off topic about what the discussion was about. Do you even read posts before you answer?

You said affliction is bad and linked some crap about how many Warlocks are above 2200, which is a stupid statistic that means nothing. So yes, I do read posts and now you're the one talking shit because you're ego is too high to admit you were wrong.