http://www.25idl.army.mil/PT/Guide%2...ss%20TG281.pdf
Read Section V. Musculoskeletal Injury, Page 47 and 48.
http://www.25idl.army.mil/PT/Guide%2...ss%20TG281.pdf
Read Section V. Musculoskeletal Injury, Page 47 and 48.
I'll save him the reading (and anyone else that keeps trying to make that point):
Female service members have double the rate of injury of the low back and lower extremities as males.Gender differences in anatomy, hormones, neuromuscular, and biomechanics act to enhance the risk of injury. Less muscular protection of the knee ligaments during loading and reduced ability of the low back to handle compressive loading predisposes females to lower back injury while running, marching with a load, or jumping from military vehicles. Military studies consistently show that females suffer a much higher rate of stress fracture to the leg, thigh and hip, possibly due to a biomechanical or physiological difference between male and female bone resistance to stress and fatigue.
No, actually, it very much does change for them. Do I have to point out, again, that the training requirements for women would be relatively higher for those in this situation compared to the population represented in that study? You have repeatedly overlooked this essential aspect of the situation.