Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ...
5
6
7
8
LastLast
  1. #121
    Quote Originally Posted by Korgoth View Post
    Wrong, its exactly how it works. There is 0 reason functionally why Blizzard could not reduce player damage by 65%, reduce NPC health by 65%, then remove resilience. The only reason to keep damage so dramatically high compared to player health, is PVE EPEEN. BIG NUMBERS RAWR! That's it.

    PvP has been getting fucked over by the PVE EPEEN Inflating damage system since Wrath. Resilience shouldnt exist in its current form. It serves no purpose that could not be achieved by the Devs setting player DPS around player health, instead of setting player dps around PVE'r EPEEN.
    wrong, thats exactly not how it works.

  2. #122
    They should just reboot pvp altogether, remove instant casts, give everyone 2 cc's max, 1 interrupt and adress hybrids and hunters. Fully seperate from pve.

  3. #123
    The Unstoppable Force I change my name a lot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Dota 2 24/7 / Dark Souls II
    Posts
    21,538
    Quote Originally Posted by Frozenbeef View Post
    PVP gets nerfed because of PVE as well..just look at the 65% resilience..that was purely to encourage raiders to pvp more -.-
    That was fucking stupid and un-needed change personally.

    ---------- Post added 2013-06-29 at 07:38 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by impfernal View Post
    They should just reboot pvp altogether, remove instant casts, give everyone 2 cc's max, 1 interrupt and adress hybrids and hunters. Fully seperate from pve.
    Separate the pvE and PVP other games have done it hell THEY'VE DONE it example

    Find weakness is 100% on NPC's however on players it is 50%

  4. #124
    I am Murloc! Korgoth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Barbaria
    Posts
    5,654
    Quote Originally Posted by SirReal View Post
    wrong, thats exactly not how it works.
    Care to back that up? Oh wait you cant. The only reason damage is as high as it is, so high that everyone is given 65% passive damage reduction, is PVE player EPEEN. If they dont see big numbers, they have a small dick and cry.
    You, you'll regret what you have done this day, I will make you regret ever being born, you're going to wish you never left your mother's womb, where it was warm and safe and wet, I am going to show you pain you never knew existed, you're going to see a whole new spectrum of pain, like a Rainbow!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=ep65rr-9qjQ Full Pilot Episode! Best thing to come out of Adult Swim!

  5. #125
    Totally with you on that one. Every other Patch for example has been "nerf Stampede for PvP buff other Hunter Abilities to compensate for PvE".

    The PvP Team should just adjust all Numbers of all Spells for PvP Balance without affectin PvE and Vice-Versa.
    Another 2 Examples are ALL DOTS Nerfs by 25% in PvE where it was reasonable but no Point nerfing them for PvP.
    Or right now in 5.4 all passive Damage Reduction abilities like Fel Armor and Shadow form and Aspect of the Iron Hawk are being nerfed to streamline PvE incoming Damage so Raiders don't desire the affected Classes for their Survivability but this will also mess up PvP Balance even though it has nothing to do with raiding.

    There are some changes in the right direction like the aforementioned different Durations of CrowdControl such as Polymorph or Sap, and recently there were PvP Nerfs to he Maximum Number of Deathknight AoE Grip and Warlock's Chaos Bolt dealing less Damage to players.

    After these Changes PvP Players can enjoy more balanced Games while PvE Raiders can still Massgrip 50 Mobs or whatever as DK and have shiny big Crits on their Chaos Bolts. Hope to see more of these

  6. #126
    I think Blizzard shouldnt implement half the stuff to begin with. It's like they don't think 'oh wait, maybe vengeance in PvP will cause tanks to hit hard', they just get over excited by new concepts and end up having to nerf them anyway.

  7. #127
    One other company already have found a solution to this problem.They always split the spells,talents and everything on two - PvE and PvP.For instance you have fire ball which is doing in PvE 2k dmg and in PvP it will be 1k.
    So when you balance one part of the game(PvE) you don't have to worry that you have buffed or nerfed the other one(PvP).I don't know why blizzard haven't done that.They are not reiventing the wheel or something.They will just use a system that already exists and is proven to work.

  8. #128
    The Patient Vamandrac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Stormwind
    Posts
    327
    I'm sick of Blizzard messing up PvP by trying to make it more PvE friendly. Works both ways.

    Everything I say is absolute. If you disagree, you're a communist.

  9. #129
    Scarab Lord roahn the warlock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    In your base, killing your dudes
    Posts
    4,749
    Quote Originally Posted by Slonah View Post
    I hate players in PvE gear being viable in PvP while players in PvP gear are not viable for PvE
    That's because it is really, really easy to get pvp gear. With a minimal ammount of skill I earned 10k conquest last week. That equated to about a helm, a robe, a weapon, and a offhand. There is no way in hell I would ever get that in a raid.

    Getting raid bosses down are harder than doing the basic minimum to get conquest and get gear for pvp.

    That is why it does not go both ways. It's between getting full 496 in a week, and weeks to get close to that in pve

    ---------- Post added 2013-06-30 at 03:11 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Vamandrac View Post
    I'm sick of Blizzard messing up PvP by trying to make it more PvE friendly. Works both ways.
    Yeeeaaaah no. This is first and foremost a PVE game. arenas was an after thought. This is why you get one new arena a x pack and we get tons of goodies.

    The original point of PVP was for raiders to beat the shit out of eachother. Arena ruined that. BUT, Blizzard still seems to think it should be raiders beating on the other, so they refuse to change spells to be pvp and pve specific, or make a pvp spec for simple ass balancing
    It was never Hardcore Vs Casual. It was Socialites Vs. Solo players

  10. #130
    Dreadlord ipoststuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    The Internet
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by roahn the warlock View Post
    Yeeeaaaah no. This is first and foremost a PVE game. arenas was an after thought. This is why you get one new arena a x pack and we get tons of goodies.

    The original point of PVP was for raiders to beat the shit out of eachother. Arena ruined that. BUT, Blizzard still seems to think it should be raiders beating on the other, so they refuse to change spells to be pvp and pve specific, or make a pvp spec for simple ass balancing
    Thats your opinion. PvP existed from the beginning. This game wouldnt be what it is today if it wasnt for pvp.

  11. #131
    Quote Originally Posted by Xecks View Post
    anyone with me? i am sooooo tired of it . hunters are getting boned cause of it and so are locks.
    I was sick of it 7 years ago... <.<


    EDIT:
    Quote Originally Posted by ipoststuff View Post
    Thats your opinion. PvP existed from the beginning. This game wouldnt be what it is today if it wasnt for pvp.
    You're right; it'd be better. =P

  12. #132
    Herald of the Titans Razorice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Over there --->
    Posts
    2,931
    I'm sick of PvE causing PvP nerfs.

  13. #133
    Scarab Lord ViridianWRA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Rainbow Road
    Posts
    4,009
    I'm happy to have moved from Rogue to a tank. Brewmaster PVP ain't gonna ruin shit for me.

    You mean I have room for text now?

  14. #134
    Quote Originally Posted by Xecks View Post
    well i guess i should add more.
    stampede was a big dmg boost in pve and it is a lvl 87 skill the last one we learn. it SHOULD do high dmg.
    Who says that? Lifeswap didn't do damage at all and it's a 87 ability

  15. #135
    Bloodsail Admiral
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    1,185
    Quote Originally Posted by ipoststuff View Post
    Thats your opinion. PvP existed from the beginning. This game wouldnt be what it is today if it wasnt for pvp.
    Yes, but you are confusing PvP, with Arenas. "PvP' is balanced around predominately around arena, secondary balance around BG's (small). Has been since its inception(Arena).

    Hell, Rob Prado even said the implementation of Arenas was one of his biggest mistakes.
    "Oh, wretched ephemeral race, children of chance and misery, why do you compel me to tell you what it would be more expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is utterly beyond your reach; not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. But the second best for you is --- to die soon." Silenus

  16. #136
    Quote Originally Posted by ipoststuff View Post
    Thats your opinion. PvP existed from the beginning. This game wouldnt be what it is today if it wasnt for pvp.
    No, he said Arena was an afterthought. That's not an opinion.

    PvP at launch was completely non-structured and had zero rewards. It was a throwaway addon that required a huge amount of work before it became a viable way to play the game.

    Complain all you like, PvE was the original and main focus for WoW. It still is, and yet suffers because of PvP.

    And yeah, PvP works better in PvE then PvE gear works in PvP. That's what PvP Power is for, and why it has no itemlevel budget anymore.

  17. #137
    Brewmaster Naztrak's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Nagrand Arena
    Posts
    1,400
    stampede was a big dmg boost in pve and it is a lvl 87 skill the last one we learn. it SHOULD do high dmg.
    something designed so retarded like stampede should never have come into the game

    Hell, Rob Prado even said the implementation of Arenas was one of his biggest mistakes.
    No, he bitched about how hard was the balancing after the implementation and said that they didn't except to have so much work afterwards. Just typical blizzard.

    Yeeeaaaah no. This is first and foremost a PVE game. arenas was an after thought. This is why you get one new arena a x pack and we get tons of goodies.
    goddies like LFR, watered down raids and dumbed down classes. k
    and we dont even need more content, that why there are countless full private AT realms.
    Last edited by Naztrak; 2013-06-30 at 09:38 AM.

  18. #138
    Quote Originally Posted by roahn the warlock View Post
    Yeeeaaaah no. This is first and foremost a PVE game. arenas was an after thought. This is why you get one new arena a x pack and we get tons of goodies.


    No. This is a RP game, sit down to your RPing overlords.

  19. #139
    Bloodsail Admiral
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    1,185
    Quote Originally Posted by Naztrak View Post
    something designed so retarded like stampede should never have come into the game



    No, he bitched about how hard was the balancing after the implementation and said that they didn't except to have so much work afterwards. Just typical blizzard.
    http://wow.joystiq.com/2009/11/13/bl...ere-a-mistake/

    Pardo indicates that most of the changes to the game since launch have been a success -- the shrinking of raid sizes, the addition of Heroic dungeons, etc -- but that Arena has been a huge headache for Blizzard and players alike. He goes on to say that if he had the choice, he'd either go back to WoW's beginnings and change the fundamentals of class balance, or, barring that, would nix the decision to add Arenas during the development of the Burning Crusade expansion.
    That's not to say they wouldn't have added it in WotLK, but he wasnt Lead Dev then so... yeah.
    Last edited by Todgruppe; 2013-06-30 at 09:45 AM.
    "Oh, wretched ephemeral race, children of chance and misery, why do you compel me to tell you what it would be more expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is utterly beyond your reach; not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. But the second best for you is --- to die soon." Silenus

  20. #140
    Brewmaster Naztrak's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Nagrand Arena
    Posts
    1,400
    Do you even read? They/he never said that arena was the mistakes, they bitched how much they have to work to please all of the playerbases. The only one that said arenas were a mistake was the article writer who lacks comprehension skills.

    he even said in the full interview

    I'm not sure that that was the right thing to do with the game.
    and

    If I could go back in time before we shipped WoW, I would have either made serious changes to basic class balance to facilitate that type of play, or if I went back to when we had the idea two years later, I would have said, "Maybe we shouldn't go there."
    Doesn't sound like someone that would scrap of arenas. He isn't even sure about everything.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •