The winners are heroes, the losers are terrorists. That's just how history works.
I wasn't responding to you. I was responding as if what you said was what you really believed.
---------- Post added 2013-06-29 at 03:02 PM ----------
A revolution does not require the killing of civilians. The only reason that Mandela killed civilians is because he learned his guerilla tactics from Chairman Mao.
If the cause is good and sacrifices have to be made, then so be it. Casualties happen.
I'd would say the same. Unlike you or Thalian, I don't live in fantasyland where people never die from revolutions or war. People die, get over it.Doubt you'd say the same if members of your family were victims of that.
No im not saying that young muslims are terrorists, but there are a few here in europe that are joining the fight in Syria. Im neutral to the whole thing, but that doesnt mean that the people going there do not believe in their cause. So in some peoples eye's they are considered to be terrorists but more like minded people will view them as freedome fighters. And how history will view them will depend on who wins.
Everything is in my first post. From Wikipedia pages Nelson Mandela, African National Congress and their terrorist wing MK (don't speak Afrikaans, can't spell it out).
---------- Post added 2013-06-29 at 03:05 PM ----------
I never heard the rape thing... but the citation is Wikipedia. You'd know that if you weren't as blind as a bat.
I think its more about that Bombs kill indiscriminately.
So how do you label the rebels in Syria that is fighting against the tyranny of Bashar Al-Assad? How do you label the people like Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. or how do you label the people that took up the conflict against the nazi's? or how do you label the people that in Iraq wanted to see Saddam Husein gone. Or how do you label people like Rodolfo Frometa that bought a stinger anti air rocket, M-72 anti tank rockets, C4 and a Rocket launcher, all this bought from an undercover FBI agent.