Page 42 of 42 FirstFirst ...
32
40
41
42
  1. #821
    Whereas obviously the guy with burning Ragnaros avatar and signature who didn't actually post any facts or statistics doesn't hold any bias at all

  2. #822
    its not ragnaros, its t11, or something.
    #1 fire mage US. u mirin'?
    "Aaah ah ah ah ah ah ah yea, f*ck me, ah, f*ck, aah yeah"
    - Jenna Jameson

  3. #823
    Quote Originally Posted by unholyness View Post
    That is odd because Blatty in BIS Arcane was pretty much destroyed in every fight by the other Fire mages in the group. In face he tweeted just the other day for Arcane buffs and how he needed to rethink what spec is he going to play next patch. HE again tweeted,'when Arcane is destroyed by fire..on single target' that he needed to rethink what spec to play which is good news for fire mages. He mentioned that Combustion damage is crap but with no haste break points for a while it will be nice crit,haste and mastery throwing a lot of pyro's.

    - - - Updated - - -



    Vykina has been destroying Blatty in BIS on the PTR and when they also tried out the T16 w/trinkets, Fire is the best scaling spec in the game and will be the spec to play when 5.4 comes out also.
    The fact that you mentionned 3 times that fire destroys arcane in your post just kills your credibility sorry. Vykina himself said he was going to play 2 fights as Arcane. And him being probably one of the best in the world with Combustion, that means a shitload of people should do so aswell, because they sure as hell don't Combust as well as him, which is what keeps fire ahead.

  4. #824
    Quote Originally Posted by fearist View Post
    its not ragnaros, its t11, or something.
    Do you know what (who) T11 is supposed to look like?
    Go look at the set name and get back to me

  5. #825
    Quote Originally Posted by Imnick View Post
    Do you know what (who) T11 is supposed to look like?
    Go look at the set name and get back to me
    Atleast I'm willing to admit that fire will do better than arcane on some fights. I'm not trying to say that arcane will be #1 for every fight absolute top dps always, I know it won't. But people acting like fire (for another patch) is the only choice and that fire is super op, and that arcane can't touch fire and that fire will beat arcane every fight is just -wrong-. It is wrong. If you believe that (not you Imnick, fearist) then you have another thing coming. Arcane will excell on certain fights, fire won't do bottom of the chart dps, but arcane will have an edge on quite a few fights. Same with fire, it will have an edge on a few fights. It depends the fights.

    People saying that arcane is 100% un-viable are just wrong. Both specs will be playable next tier. This arguement is stupid at this point.

    This thread has kind of depleted it's purpose. PTR is ending soon, fire got nerfed. Arcane and fire will be viable next patch. Let's leave it at that and close this thread.

  6. #826
    this thread should have been closed weeks ago

  7. #827
    Yeah this is getting pretty pointless. Its obvious that fire and arcane both have a place and saying otherwise is just silly. I'll be playing arcane week 1 just because I've been playing fire for a long ass time and its getting boring. I will however have fire gems ready and waiting because there will be a day/boss that it has to happen.

  8. #828
    Brewmaster Methusula's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Mastamage View Post
    this thread should have been closed weeks ago
    Yeah, we seem to be in need of a moderator or two. Good thing Mage forums have been relatively civil lately.

  9. #829
    Quote Originally Posted by Methusula View Post
    Yeah, we seem to be in need of a moderator or two. Good thing Mage forums have been relatively civil lately.
    the only time the moderator showed up in the past month is when there was talk of someone else writing an Arcane guide for 5.4 and getting rid of the current one.

  10. #830
    Quote Originally Posted by Imnick View Post
    Do you know what (who) T11 is supposed to look like?
    Go look at the set name and get back to me
    Firelord, not ragnaros sorry sir. its too ambiguious to really know what that means. case of the mysterious mask closed, please stay on subject before resorting to trolling.
    #1 fire mage US. u mirin'?
    "Aaah ah ah ah ah ah ah yea, f*ck me, ah, f*ck, aah yeah"
    - Jenna Jameson

  11. #831
    Quote Originally Posted by fearist View Post
    Firelord, not ragnaros sorry sir. its too ambiguious to really know what that means. case of the mysterious mask closed, please stay on subject before resorting to trolling.
    Ragnaros was the Firelord until you kill him and get the title for yourself... Ragnaros is even referred to as "the Firelord" in the dungeon journal.
    Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
    I'm determined to someday make Med'an awesome. (MickyNeilson)

    ´So.. sorry to bring this up but..you know that .."thing" (Med'an).. is that "thing" cannon still?
    ...as much have some have wished otherwise, yes. (Loreology)

  12. #832
    Bloodsail Admiral Saegno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Kansas City, Ks
    Posts
    1,013
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquamonkey View Post
    Ragnaros was the Firelord until you kill him and get the title for yourself... Ragnaros is even referred to as "the Firelord" in the dungeon journal.
    It's pointless to argue with blugatti. It doesn't work in mal'ganis trade chat, I doubt it will work here.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lohe View Post
    If you're semi-hardcore or semi-casual what's the other half? To me, they're both the same thing.
    Canicus - 577 - Arcane Mage - US Mal'Ganis Horde - 12/14H T16

  13. #833
    ok my last post on this matter since its really off topic and i dont want to get banned for "trolling".
    ok i mean i can see how they are similiar, i mean theyre both made of lava so i can kinda see how you would make that connection but hmmm im just not seeing it my man. i think the set is just suppose to look like a fire mage.

    #1 fire mage US. u mirin'?
    "Aaah ah ah ah ah ah ah yea, f*ck me, ah, f*ck, aah yeah"
    - Jenna Jameson

  14. #834
    Quote Originally Posted by Mastamage View Post
    the only time the moderator showed up in the past month is when there was talk of someone else writing an Arcane guide for 5.4 and getting rid of the current one.
    I appear only when the celestial beacons align and summon me forth. Or I'm bored, either way. Gonna close this since the patch launches in less than a week and this thread is now about whether Ragnaros is or isn't the Firelord (hint: he is).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •