Demands of the Alliance if they win ?

[Ciddy]

Something to do with Sylvanas and a stripper pole in the Stormwind throne room.

...what? Alliance players can dream, can't we?

OK, but seriously, I'd say we'll just ask for reasonable things. For example, we could maybe ask the horde to back out of all the warmongering bullshit Garrosh has been doing. Back off from Ashenvale (while still keeping it contested like before, but without all the horde war machines and military presence there), back off from Gilneas, etc. Maybe give up some supplies and/or labor to help rebuild Theramore, if that's possible.

I really miss Southshore and would like to see the alliance get it back / cleaned up in some form, but I guess we're pretty far beyond any possibility of that now. I actually think it'd be kinda cool if Southshore becomes a proper Forsaken town, but the Alliance gets to retake Tarren Mill. Then it could kinda be like the old days, but with the alliance and horde protecting opposite towns now.

[Talen]

Technically silithus doesn't belong to the alliance or the horde, it's been a contested zone for the longest time.

Zone control and PvP status doesn't mark zone ownership or political boundaries.

EJL

[arcaneshot]

In real life, this one could be a realistic treaty signed by the winner side (and I belive it is still an indecisive outcome). BUT no hordy-boy belives that the occupation of their capital, the disgregation of their leadership, the big losses of their prime-race/their elite fighting force and the defeat in Pandaria means they've lost, so you can't absolutely say the alliance can ask any sort of retribution for the war.

The main problem with the reparations idea is you've got over 3/4 of the Horde on your side. Stuff like the Treaty of Versailles happened in absence of over 3/4 of Germany siding with the Allied Powers, which is why any comparison to such doesn't float.

Defeating the enemy nation, but then turning around and demanding the rebels that were on the same side you were fighting on pay for what they were rebelling against just makes the Alliance look like complete jerks.

[Dreknar20]

Defeating the enemy nation, but then turning around and demanding the rebels that were on the same side you were fighting on pay for what they were rebelling against just makes the Alliance look like complete jerks.

Is a treaty like Versailles really the best example? That treaty didnt work out very well...............
You cant heap scorn and humiliation upon a defeated faction and say its in the name of friendship and peace

[Acepox]

Exactly what's fun about Versailles: It allows for future BlueVSred combat in 2 or 3 xpacs.