Thread: Need opinions

  1. #1
    The Lightbringer Asera's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    This side of an imaginary line in the sand
    Posts
    3,741

    Need opinions

    I recently got a Bitfenix Prodigy and H77 ITX board to compress my 2500K system into a smaller form factor (previously was in a Define XL). I find I don't like the ITX platform, as I cannot use a dedicated sound card, and onboard just isn't cutting it. Sooo...

    I'm thinking of either:

    A) Replacing the case and board with a Define Mini and appropriate LGA1155 board, or
    B) Replacing the case, PSU, and switching from the 2500K to Haswell.

    The only thing I'd be reusing on option B is the video card.

    Now for the opinion part. How much is it worth going from an i5 2500K to say, an i5 4570? Keeping in mind I don't bother with overclocking anymore. Is the 4670K enough of a performance bump at stock speeds to the 4570 to justify the extra $20CAD? And finally, I like the look and price of the Gigabyte Q87M-D2H, but I'm not sure if the vPro and Small Business Advantage is useful to me. That and the position of the PCIe slots is kinda crap. I don't think I need a Z87 board since I don't overclock. Any suggestions?

    Thanks!
    red panda red panda red panda!

  2. #2
    Moderator chazus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    17,222
    A) Case, Board - Will cost about $160 with no performance difference
    B) Case, Board, PSU, CPU - Will cost about $430 with about a 15-25% performance boost

    If you aren't overclocking, don't get the K version. I think it's silly not to overclock, but that's you're call. The difference between the 4570 and 4670 is just 100mhz. Not worth it, IMO.

    The Q87M-D2H also seems expensive for what you're doing.

    Personally, I wouldn't go for Haswell. You're spending a lot of money for a fairly small performance boost, where you could get performance boosts much cheaper. A better solution is overclocking your 2500K beyond the capabilities of a stock Haswell.
    Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
    Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro

    IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads
    "Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab

  3. #3
    The Lightbringer Asera's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    This side of an imaginary line in the sand
    Posts
    3,741
    Quote Originally Posted by chazus View Post
    A) Case, Board - Will cost about $160 with no performance difference
    B) Case, Board, PSU, CPU - Will cost about $430 with about a 15-25% performance boost

    If you aren't overclocking, don't get the K version. I think it's silly not to overclock, but that's you're call. The difference between the 4570 and 4670 is just 100mhz. Not worth it, IMO.

    The Q87M-D2H also seems expensive for what you're doing.

    Personally, I wouldn't go for Haswell. You're spending a lot of money for a fairly small performance boost, where you could get performance boosts much cheaper. A better solution is overclocking your 2500K beyond the capabilities of a stock Haswell.
    I had the 2500K running at 4600mhz for about 16 months before I had to start bumping the voltage up every couple of weeks. I'm kind of worried it's degrading and trying to do that to it again might slaughter it. :[

    I'm all for option A myself, but the only drawback is I can't find a board that isn't gaudy, too cheap, or doesn't have a horrible slot layout.
    red panda red panda red panda!

  4. #4
    Moderator chazus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    17,222
    2500K @ 4.3ghz would be the same performance as a 4570. Not only that, but it may have been the board, and not the CPU.

    Define 'gaudy'. If you're shooting yourself in the foot over looks... well. I don't really have advice for that. What slot layout do you need?

    Is there anything wrong with this?
    Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
    Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro

    IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads
    "Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab

  5. #5
    The Lightbringer Asera's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    This side of an imaginary line in the sand
    Posts
    3,741
    Quote Originally Posted by chazus View Post
    2500K @ 4.3ghz would be the same performance as a 4570. Not only that, but it may have been the board, and not the CPU.

    Define 'gaudy'. If you're shooting yourself in the foot over looks... well. I don't really have advice for that. What slot layout do you need?

    Is there anything wrong with this?
    It's the dual PCI slots that bother me about most of those boards.... ugh.

    Aside from that, it's a nice board.

    I had my 2500K at 4.6 on a P8Z68V-Pro. I guess it could have been that, but it was aptly cooled.
    red panda red panda red panda!

  6. #6
    Moderator chazus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    17,222
    It's the dual PCI slots that bother me about most of those boards.... ugh.
    I'm not sure I quite understand what the problem is. your video card will cover those up regardless.
    Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
    Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro

    IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads
    "Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab

  7. #7
    The Lightbringer Asera's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    This side of an imaginary line in the sand
    Posts
    3,741
    Quote Originally Posted by chazus View Post
    I'm not sure I quite understand what the problem is. your video card will cover those up regardless.
    I think it's mostly OCD. I can deal with it obviously, but... preference. If theres a board without them, I'd opt for that over the double PCI boards, if the extra cost isn't exorbitantly high.
    red panda red panda red panda!

  8. #8
    Moderator chazus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    17,222
    You're going to have to deal with it, then. I can't think of any boards that don't have at least a few extra slots on them, of some kind or another.
    Gaming: Dual Intel Pentium III Coppermine @ 1400mhz + Blue Orb | Asus CUV266-D | GeForce 2 Ti + ZF700-Cu | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 | Whistler Build 2267
    Media: Dual Intel Drake Xeon @ 600mhz | Intel Marlinspike MS440GX | Matrox G440 | 1024mb Crucial PC-133 @ 166mhz | Windows 2000 Pro

    IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WANKERSHIM | Did you mean: Fhqwhgads
    "Three days on a tree. Hardly enough time for a prelude. When it came to visiting agony, the Romans were hobbyists." -Mab

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Asera View Post
    I find I don't like the ITX platform, as I cannot use a dedicated sound card, and onboard just isn't cutting it. Sooo...
    Sounds like the solution would be an external USB DAC.

  10. #10
    The Lightbringer Asera's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    This side of an imaginary line in the sand
    Posts
    3,741
    Quote Originally Posted by yurano View Post
    Sounds like the solution would be an external USB DAC.
    Except I have an Asus Xonar Essence STX sitting next to me.
    red panda red panda red panda!

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Asera View Post
    I had the 2500K running at 4600mhz for about 16 months before I had to start bumping the voltage up every couple of weeks. I'm kind of worried it's degrading and trying to do that to it again might slaughter it. :[
    Let me guess, all C states/speedstep disabled + manual voltage? :P That way it does degrade fast yes.

  12. #12
    The Lightbringer Asera's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    This side of an imaginary line in the sand
    Posts
    3,741
    Quote Originally Posted by Faithh View Post
    Let me guess, all C states/speedstep disabled + manual voltage? :P That way it does degrade fast yes.
    C states and speedstep on, and offset voltage, actually.
    red panda red panda red panda!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •